Trump wants a grand military parade. Some veterans say that won’t fix their problems.

Critics say a parade isn’t the best way Trump could support the military.

President Donald Trump is receiving quite a bit of pushback for his plan for a grand military parade down Pennsylvania Avenue. 

According to a Washington Post report: 

"Surrounded by the military's highest-ranking officials, including Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., Trump's seemingly abstract desire for a parade was suddenly heard as a presidential directive, the officials said. 

" 'The marching orders were: I want a parade like the one in France,' said a military official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the planning discussions are supposed to remain confidential. 'This is being worked at the highest levels of the military.' " 

Even the hosts of Trump's beloved "Fox and Friends" expressed reservations about the spectacle that could cost millions. 

"I don't know," co-host Brian Kilmeade said Wednesday. "It seems like a waste of money." 

Trump has frequently spoken of his longtime support for veterans - he praised them twice in the past week in his Black History Month proclamation and in his Super Bowl statement. 

But the president's critics have called his support for the military shallow, noting that Trump has never served in uniform (he was approved of multiple deferments for bone spurs during the Vietnam War), and he has attempted to fill his administration with generals for the purpose of optics. 

Some critics even went so far as to say the parading of military strength makes Trump look more like an authoritarian dictator than the leader of a democracy. 

Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., an Air Force veteran, tweeted that Trump's proposal is a significant waste of funds and suggested Trump focus on other issues, like developing a military strategy. 

And Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., a Marine veteran who served in Iraq, said a parade makes little sense financially or in terms of international relations. 

"A parade of this kind would represent a significant waste of tax dollars. At a time when Congress is wrestling with how best to recapitalize our military and better protect the force after 17 years of war in Afghanistan and Iraq, resources should be deployed to enhance military readiness and warfighting, not wasted on such a pointless display," he said in a statement. "No one in the world doubts the strength of our military or the professionalism of our men and women in uniform. A parade will not alter that perception. Instead, it will likely prompt ridicule from our friends and foes alike." 

Vote Vets, a left-leaning veterans group, rebuked the idea with retired Major Gen. Paul Eaton, a senior adviser to the group, saying: "The military is not Donald Trump's to use and abuse in this way. Our military is the very best in the world - they are not to be reduced to stagecraft to prop up Donald Trump's image. Any commander in chief who respects the traditions of the military would understand that. Unfortunately, we do not have a commander in chief, right now, as much as we have a wannabe banana republic strongman." 

But unsurprisingly, some conservatives have expressed support for the parade. 

Former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said Democrats and the media will criticize the decision, but citizens will love it. 

"Ds and most media will decry this, objecting to the costs. When it happens, many Ds won't like it because it's militaristic. But most Americans will eat it up. They'll love the pomp and will take pride in the show of force/honor of the troops," he tweeted. 

Many lawmakers and veterans on both sides of the aisle would agree that America needs to put more of a spotlight on veterans and members of the military. When it comes to issues related to physical and mental health, homelessness, unemployment and sexual abuse, advocates say the military is often underfunded and undersupported. 

A White House official familiar with the planning told The Post that the event is still in the "brainstorming" phase. But even if Trump did not require Americans to foot the bill and instead relied on wealthy donors, critics are bound to ask why the president is choosing to fund pageantry instead of areas that could tangibly improve the lives of veterans. 

John Hoellwarth, communications director for American Veterans, a service organization, told The Washington Post that a parade "lionizing the military" could address the military's existing recruitment problems. 

"Burning the existing budget on a parade is probably a better idea than flying aircraft over a dome during the Super Bowl and is not a terrible idea provided that it doesn't come at the expense of other programs" like those related to providing adequate health care for severely injured troops, he said. 

Voters who served in the military (mostly veterans but also active duty) supported Trump by 60 percent over his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, in the 2016 presidential election. 

There's no polling showing what service members want most from their president, but the likelihood of a parade being at the top of the list is low.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Politics

Susan Pompeo’s role as ‘first lady of the CIA’ draws critics, defenders
Susan Pompeo’s role as ‘first lady of the CIA’ draws critics, defenders

Susan Pompeo, the wife of Central Intelligence Agency Director Mike Pompeo, has taken an unusually active and prominent role at the organization, and has fashioned herself as an unofficial "first lady of the CIA," according to people with knowledge of her activities.  Pompeo, who is a volunteer at the CIA, uses office space on the seventh-floor...
Trump may reshuffle legal team to take on Mueller more aggressively
Trump may reshuffle legal team to take on Mueller more aggressively

President Donald Trump’s legal team was poised for a shake-up on Monday, according to two people briefed on the matter, as he openly discussed firing one of his lawyers, another considered resigning and a third — who pushed theories on television that Trump was framed by the FBI — joined the roster.  Trump has weighed aloud in...
How Kushner forged a bond with the Saudi crown prince
How Kushner forged a bond with the Saudi crown prince

One year ago, two young princes began to forge a friendship at a lunch meeting in the White House's regal State Dining Room.  A snowstorm had kept away President Donald Trump's scheduled guest that day, German Chancellor Angela Merkel — giving the president and his advisers, including son-in-law Jared Kushner, more time to spend with the...
Trump-linked political data firm offered to entrap politicians
Trump-linked political data firm offered to entrap politicians

Sitting in a hotel bar, Alexander Nix, who runs the political data firm Cambridge Analytica, had a few ideas for a prospective client looking for help in a foreign election. The firm could send an attractive woman to seduce a rival candidate and secretly videotape the encounter, Nix said, or send someone posing as a wealthy land developer to pass a...
‘You will not destroy America’: A Trump battle is no longer one-sided
‘You will not destroy America’: A Trump battle is no longer one-sided

Usually, top intelligence and law enforcement officials withdraw to lives of tight-lipped relative anonymity after their careers end. (Suffice it to say, they are not exactly known for viral Twitter battles.)  But as President Donald Trump has voiced his grievances against the FBI with a series of insult-laden tweets, his targets have responded...
More Stories