Trump can sell an improved economy, but not himself

When he took office a year ago, President Donald Trump painted a bleak picture of a country ravaged by economic turmoil, a landscape of “American carnage,” as he so memorably put it. A year later, he presented the nation on Tuesday night with a different narrative, one of a booming economy and a “new American moment.” 

Never mind that in some fundamental ways the economy is growing no faster than it did at points during his predecessor’s second term. Trump is at heart a salesman, and he rarely lets details get in the way of a good story. And by some measures, he has managed to convince many Americans, especially corporate leaders, that the economy really is surging in a way it has not for years. 

The challenge for Trump as he delivered his first formal State of the Union address was that even as he sells the economy, he has not been able to sell himself. His approval ratings remain at historic lows, and effectively unchanged after a year in office. His success at passing tax cuts and the continued progress of the economy he inherited have not changed the dismal views that a sizable majority of Americans hold of their president. 

Just 37 percent of Americans approve of the job he is doing, according to the latest survey by the Pew Research Center, a historic low for a president after a year in office and no better for all of his efforts. Forty-one percent think he will be an unsuccessful president, twice as many as last year and nearly twice as many as those who think he will be successful. Far fewer Americans think he keeps his promises than thought so when he was inaugurated. 

Trump’s outsize personality has so polarized the country that he may not be able to win over many converts easily, even with opportunities like a national television audience of tens of millions. His stated goal for the speech was to reach beyond his base and put forward a more optimistic, bipartisan face to a presidency that has been exceedingly divisive, but he has demonstrated before that such moments rarely last before he begins lobbing political artillery shells all over again. 

In the hours before the speech, he was in reach-out mode. Meeting with television network anchors, he was asked what he had learned in his first year as president. “When you’re a businessman, you don’t have to worry about your heart, the heart,” he said. “You really do what’s best for you, you know, for almost purely monetary reasons. You know, you make your money.” 

“In doing what I’m doing now,” he added, “a lot of it is heart, a lot of it is compassion, a lot of it is far beyond money, such as immigration, such as the things we’re talking about.” 

Compassion is not the word his critics or even many of his admirers would use to characterize Trump’s tenure so far, at least when it comes to immigrants from Muslim countries or Africa, racial minorities protesting white supremacists, women subjected to sexual harassment or working families dependent on government health care programs. Just 33 percent of Americans said they thought of him as compassionate in a new Politico/Morning Consult poll. 

His strength at the moment, at least as perceived by White House advisers and their allies, is an economy that seems to be humming and the possibility that it will grow stronger in the next year as a result of Trump’s tax cuts and regulatory rollback. 

The stock markets have soared since his election, a point he rarely fails to mention, although what goes up can go down, as he saw before the speech, when the Dow Jones industrial average fell by nearly 363 points, or 1.37 percent. 

Other indicators mirror points in President Barack Obama’s tenure. The economy grew by 2.3 percent in 2017, more than in 2016 but less than in 2014 or 2015. More than 2 million new jobs were created last year, a significant achievement but less than in any of the last six years of Obama’s tenure. 

The difference is that the accumulation of growth has pushed the unemployment rate down to 4.1 percent, a 17-year low, which means that wages may increase in the coming year as employers seek workers. And the other difference is that Trump unabashedly sells the success of the economy without the caveats and reservations that Obama tended to favor. 

“He has done a good job resetting expectations — something important and, yes, a better cheerleader for optimism than President Obama,” said R. Glenn Hubbard, dean of the Columbia Business School and a former chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers under George W. Bush.  

Jared Bernstein, an economics adviser to former Vice President Joe Biden, said Trump could legitimately claim credit for improving the confidence of corporate America. Obama, he said, never felt as comfortable with unalloyed claims of economic progress, fearing that it would look out of touch to many Americans who might not be enjoying the same benefits as others. 

“Obama was a lot more cautious than Trump. Of course, who isn’t?” Bernstein said. “Like any president, he took some credit for economic gains over his watch, but he was always very cognizant, very conscious, that there were significant groups of people who were left behind, so any economic cheerleading was always tempered by the reality of the unequal distribution of economic growth.”  

Trump’s cheerleading has helped convince Americans that, a decade after the trauma of the financial crash, the economy really is doing better. Fifty-eight percent of those who responded to a poll by ABC News and The Washington Post said the economy was in good or excellent shape, the most in 17 years. Yet just 38 percent credited Trump, while 50 percent said Obama deserved a great deal or good amount of credit. 

Trump seems to recognize that he is having trouble uniting the country, but in his conversation with the anchors before his speech he attributed that to a divisiveness for which he took no responsibility, saying that it preceded his ascension to power. 

“I would love to be able to bring back our country into a great form of unity,” he told the anchors. “Without a major event where people pull together, that’s hard to do,” he added, referring to a catastrophic moment like a terrorist attack. “But I’d like to do it without that major event, because usually that major event is not a good thing. I would love to do it.” 

That really would be a new American moment.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Politics

PolitiFact: No links proven between Ritalin and school shootings
PolitiFact: No links proven between Ritalin and school shootings

The National Rifle Association’s new president, Oliver North, deflected attention off guns and onto medication in the wake of last week’s Texas school shooting. “The problem that we got is we are trying like the dickens to treat the symptom without treating the disease,” North said. “The disease in this case isn&rsquo...
Austin City Council turns aside push for public referendum on CodeNext
Austin City Council turns aside push for public referendum on CodeNext

The City Council on Thursday voted against placing a petition ordinance on November’s ballot that would have asked Austin voters if they wanted to see CodeNext put to a public vote. The vote sets up a likely legal challenge to the council’s action. Local attorney Fred Lewis, one of the leaders behind the petition that garnered more than...
Trump’s gamble hits reality check with North Korea
Trump’s gamble hits reality check with North Korea

President Donald Trump attempted a revolutionary approach to North Korea — a gamble that negotiating prowess and deal-making charm in a face-to-face meeting with Kim Jong Un could accomplish what no American president or diplomat had dared to attempt in the 65 years since an uneasy armistice settled over the Korean Peninsula.  It was a bold...
Congress moves to revamp laws to combat sexual misconduct in its ranks
Congress moves to revamp laws to combat sexual misconduct in its ranks

Congress moved closer Wednesday to revamping its laws on sexual harassment and other workplace misconduct after Senate negotiators unveiled a compromise plan that would prohibit controversial taxpayer-funded settlements.  Under the new proposal, lawmakers would be personally liable for any settlements from their own misconduct, similar to the...
More Stories