Why did the bathroom bill become such a big thing this year?


Highlights

Proponents of bathroom legislation point to President Barack Obama’s 2016 school bathroom directive.

A 2015 vote to repeal the Houston anti-discrimination ordinance provided a road map for bathroom bill backers.

Transgender bathroom limits exploded onto Texas politics this year, dominating the Legislature’s regular and special sessions with all-night hearings and a barrage of protests, rallies and news conferences.

It was a far cry from the 2015 session, when a little-noticed bill requiring students to use the school bathrooms and locker rooms of their “biological sex” stalled in a committee.

A reader asked us, “Why has the bathroom bill become such a big thing? Seems like there wasn’t a problem, or at least we didn’t hear about it, until recently.”

The leading advocates for limiting transgender-friendly restrooms and changing rooms, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham, pointed to two events.

First, there was a May 2016 Obama administration letter directing school districts nationwide to allow transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identities. Schools that failed to comply could lose federal money, the letter said. Texas and 12 other states successfully sued to temporarily block the directive.

“It wasn’t that we brought this fight to the people. The fight was brought to us,” Patrick said at a January news conference to introduce Kolkhorst’s Senate Bill 6, which would have banned transgender-friendly facilities in public schools and government buildings.

Although President Donald Trump rescinded the federal school guidance in February, he “left it for the states to decide,” Kolkhorst said in late July, explaining why she continued to press for passage of SB 6.

RELATED: Bills are all but dead, but transgender bathroom fight lives on

Second, Patrick and Kolkhorst said, the Obama administration letter “came on the heels” of a November 2015 election over the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance, which voters rejected 69 percent to 31 percent.

Known as HERO, the ordinance banned discrimination based on age, religion, disability, pregnancy, family, marital, military status and sexual orientation, but opponents focused on one category — gender identity. With conservative Christian leaders in the vanguard, opponents portrayed HERO as the “Sexual Predator Protection Act” and said it would place women and girls at risk by giving men and boys access to intimate facilities.

“No men in women’s bathrooms, no boys in girls’ showers or locker rooms,” former Houston Astros star Lance Berkman said in an anti-HERO ad. “This would violate their privacy and put them in harm’s way.”

The resounding defeat of HERO provided a road map for supporters of bills to limit transgender-friendly bathroom policies, with Patrick frequently saying the legislation was needed to protect privacy, decency and safety, particularly for women and girls.

Separate polls illustrated the strength of messaging on the issue.

According to a Patrick-commissioned poll in November, 77 percent of Texans said female students should not “be forced to use the same restrooms, lockers or showers at the same time as boys,” while 69 percent said it should be illegal for a man to enter a woman’s restroom.

In a July poll of Republican voters in five Texas House districts — financed by the Texas Association of Business, a leading opponent of the legislation — only 22 percent said the “bathroom bills” would make Texas a better, more pro-family state, 20 percent said Texas would suffer economic harm “due to discrimination being legalized,” and 40 percent said little would change because “Texas already has laws to punish people who misbehave in bathrooms.”

Both Patrick and the business association touted the numbers as showing overwhelming support or opposition to the transgender bathroom limits.

During both sessions, much of the support for SB 6 and similar bills came from social conservatives and religious leaders, particularly Christian pastors, and tea party Republicans.

But it was a steady drumbeat of widespread and vocal opposition that elevated attention on the issue.

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK: Our Statesman Investigates page brings watchdog reporting to your Facebook feed

Executives from multinational corporations — including IBM, Intel, Apple and many of the nation’s largest oil and gas companies — joined pro-business groups in arguing that the bills would paint Texas as discriminatory, making it harder to attract top employees and prompting businesses to decline to move to Texas or expand operations here. Global investorsentertainersreligious leaders, pro sports officials, tourism officials, civil rights leaders and gay rights activists joined the chorus.

Transgender Texans and parents of transgender children, and the children themselves, became visible like never before, talking about their struggles with bullying and exclusion and arguing that the legislation placed a vulnerable transgender population at increased risk.

And while the regular and special sessions ended without the passage of any bathroom-related legislation, supporters have vowed to carry the issue into the 2018 Republican primaries, targeting House members who played a central role in thwarting the bills, particularly House Speaker Joe Straus, R-San Antonio, and Rep. Byron Cook, R-Corsicana, who is chairman of the State Affairs Committee.

Patrick expects the issue to resurface in 2019, when the Legislature begins its next regularly scheduled session. Opponents say they’ll be ready.

“We’ll be back to kill it again,” said Monica Roberts, a transgender activist from Houston.

GET UP TO SPEED: Check out other Austin Answered stories arising from readers’ questions

• Who is Maufrais, and why is the name written on Austin sidewalks?

• Where do the Congress Avenue Bridge bats go at night?

• Why don’t Austin police cite bicyclists?

• Why did Austin close off right-turn lane in front of Yeti?

• Are algae blooms bad for your health?

• Why can’t you swim in Lady Bird Lake?

• Quick answers to 11 of your questions and 8 more



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Texas News & Politics

LA Fitness apologizes for racial profiling incident at New Jersey club
LA Fitness apologizes for racial profiling incident at New Jersey club

LA Fitness issued an apology after two black patrons were wrongly accused of not paying at a New Jersey club and were asked to leave, CNN reported. Tshyrad Oates posted videos of the encounter, which occurred Sunday in Secaucus, New Jersey, on Facebook. Oates said he had a guest pass and his friend was a current member. Oates said in his Facebook...
Parents file $750,000 lawsuit against Tennessee trampoline park
Parents file $750,000 lawsuit against Tennessee trampoline park

A Tennessee family filed a $750,000 lawsuit against Urban Air Trampoline and Adventure Park in Cordova.  Two parents filed the lawsuit in Shelby County Circuit Court last week on behalf of their son, who was injured on a rope course at the park in September 2017.  “He was given a harness by an employee, and after he had...
Texas schoolwork asking for 'positive aspects' of slave life 'unacceptable'
Texas schoolwork asking for 'positive aspects' of slave life 'unacceptable'

U.S. Rep. Joaquín Castro, D-San Antonio, took to Twitter on Thursday to call out a San Antonio school assignment about slavery that he called “unacceptable.”  Castro tweeted an image of the assignment, which asked students to list both positive and negative aspects to living as a slave.  The charter school where the assignment...
Southwest Airlines reportedly gives $5,000 checks to passengers from Flight 1380
Southwest Airlines reportedly gives $5,000 checks to passengers from Flight 1380

At least three passengers who were aboard Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 received a $5,000 check in a letter from the airline, CNN reported Friday. One passenger, 43-year-old Jennifer Riordan of Albuquerque, New Mexico, died after debris from the plane’s engine blew out a window. The plane was forced to make an emergency landing...
Police: Man stays at bar for 30 minutes after being stabbed
Police: Man stays at bar for 30 minutes after being stabbed

A man who was stabbed early Thursday morning while at a Pittsburgh bar remained at the establishment for 30 minutes before leaving, investigators said. Police were called about 2 a.m. to a residential area near Pollock’s Cafe. Investigators said the 40-year-old victim was stabbed in the shoulder after he apparently got into a fight with another...
More Stories