Texas clerks look to derail web-based public access to court records


Highlights

The re:SearchTX service is currently available to judges; it’ll be rolled out to everyone else by this summer.

Travis County plans to have an online service independent of re:SearchTX within the next year.

Texas court clerks are resisting a state proposal they say would strip them of their constitutional authority by making court documents available online for easy public access.

The statewide database, re:SearchTX, holds records from all 254 counties and is backed by the state’s Supreme Court. It currently is used by judges and soon will be available to attorneys and the public — who could search for civil court records and review them, all from the comfort of home.

Clerks say surrendering these records to a privately operated database would violate their role as custodians; the other side says this is an overstatement, and that taxpayers, not clerks, own the records. Clerks also say their departments will lose money with the public no longer having to head to a courthouse and pay printing fees of up to $1 a page. However, their opponents point out that the new system is set up so clerks would benefit from online users.

The clerks hope the Legislature will stop the new system through a bill introduced recently by state Rep. Travis Clardy, R-Nacogdoches, who contends that clerks and commissioners courts should decide whether their counties participate in the service. Clardy said the plan is fraught with problems, including maintaining privacy for documents that contain sensitive material such as Social Security numbers and record expungements.

“Clerks want assurance if those records are used by a private enterprise they are handled appropriately,” Clardy said.

Blake Hawthorne, clerk of court of the Texas Supreme Court, said Clardy’s bill “would kill the system.”

That would be fine with clerks, or at least the nearly half who objected to the database among 129 who responded to a survey administered by the state Office of Court Administration in 2015. In that same survey, 98 percent of attorneys said they would use the database, which, if approved, would bring uniformity to how court records are kept across all 254 counties.

“I don’t see how it violates their rights as custodians,” said Joseph Larsen, a Houston-based First Amendment attorney who is on the board of the Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas. “They are made the custodians, but I don’t know that they have a right so much as they have a duty. The records are public. They’re not the clerks’ records; they’re the public’s records.”

Only civil court documents are accessible through re:SearchTX, and even those are limited to exclude family cases such as divorce and child custody. At some point, criminal court documents could be added, according to David Slayton, the administrative director of the Office of Court Administration.

Slayton said the database offers convenience because people now can get their hands on documents from their personal computer rather than going to the courthouse during business hours and printing copies.

“They are the most public records that government has,” Slayton said. “They are open for public inspection.”

The service will not cost the state additional money; it will be covered by an $18 million e-filing fee the state pays a third-party vendor.

Travis County has independent plans in the next year to launch an online database similar to re:Search TX. And it will have a wider variety of court records than re:SearchTX because it will also house documents filed pro se, meaning by people who represent themselves without an attorney. Viewing documents in Travis County’s system will be free; re:SearchTX charges 10 cents a page up to $6, with the money going to the county where the document originated.

Travis County will lose an estimated $300,000 a year from not collecting printing costs, according to District Clerk Velva Price. There will still be a charge for official copies.

Price said she’s concerned that lawmakers are moving too fast to launch re:SearchTX.

“They have not worked out technicalities,” she said.

A total of 95 Texas counties, including Bastrop, have passed resolutions opposing the new system.

Clerks voiced concerns at a Jan. 20 meeting in Austin and were given 45 days to suggest tweaks. There will be a final vote March 3, but Parker County District Clerk Sharena Gilliland, who chairs the re:SearchTX committee, said, “I’m afraid the decision has been made.

“I would love for us to be able to visit with the Supreme Court and the Office of Court Administration and stop where we’re at with this research database and go back to the drawing board,” Gilliland said. “If they have real concerns about making things easier in the internet age, of course, we would be willing to talk. But there’s easier ways to go about that goal other than violating the Constitution.”



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Texas News & Politics

Man dead, child critically injured in East Austin crash, EMS says
Man dead, child critically injured in East Austin crash, EMS says

A man in his 20s died in an accident on FM 969 Saturday morning that also left a child with life-threatening injuries, Capt. Darren Noak of the Austin-Travis County EMS said. The child with the critical injuries and another child were taken by an ambulance to Dell Children’sMedical center, while two adults in their 50s were taken to Dell Medical...
Highs in the upper 90s expected for Memorial Day weekend in Austin
Highs in the upper 90s expected for Memorial Day weekend in Austin

It will be a sunny and hot Memorial Day weekend in Austin, starting off Saturday with a high temperature of 99 degrees and a heat index of 104, according to the National Weather Service. Highs will stay in the upper 90s through the holiday on Monday, so stay safe and keep hydrated if you are spending time outdoors. At night, the temperature will fall...
Community news: CodeNext hearings scheduled for Tuesday, Saturday

TRAVIS COUNTY DOWNTOWN AUSTIN CodeNext hearings scheduled The city of Austin is considering a comprehensive revision to the Land Development Code, called CodeNext, and the City Council will host public hearings at 10 a.m. Tuesday and Saturday at City Hall, 301 W. Second St. The code affects what, where and how much can be built in Austin. It covers...
Where to honor those who gave their all
Where to honor those who gave their all

No matter where you are in Central Texas, there will be a place nearby to remember those who died while serving the country’s armed forces. The following are among the places to go this Memorial Day weekend: TRAVIS COUNTY West Austin: World War II close assault re-enactments at 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. Sunday at Camp Mabry, 2200 W. 35th St. East Austin...
PolitiFact: Death penalty is now only for those 18 and older
PolitiFact: Death penalty is now only for those 18 and older

A U.S. Supreme Court ruling keeps the 17-year-old who has admitted being the shooter at Santa Fe High School from facing the death penalty because he’s not 18. Still, a meme brought to our attention by readers suggests Dimitrios Pagourtzis, who is white, is getting some type of special treatment. It contrasts his case with that of an African-American...
More Stories