breaking news

Court of appeals blocks Austin’s paid sick leave ordinance

Ken Paxton appeal rejected, making criminal trial likely


The state’s highest criminal court on Wednesday rejected Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s request to dismiss securities fraud charges against him, setting the stage for a trial that could begin as early as spring.

The Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision to refuse Paxton’s case, delivered without comment, was a severe setback to Paxton’s pretrial attempts to toss out three felony charges linked to private business deals from 2011 and 2012, when he was a member of the Legislature.

Defense lawyers, arguing that the charges against Paxton lacked merit, said they will ask the court to reconsider its decision.

“We anticipate filing a motion for rehearing because we have tremendous confidence in our case,” Paxton lawyers Philip Hilder and Bill Mateja said in a written statement.

The appeals court, however, rarely grants requests to rehear a rejected appeal, and prosecutors said Wednesday that they were preparing for an as yet unscheduled trial in Collin County.

“Today’s ruling marks an end to Mr. Paxton’s almost yearlong attempt to avoid being judged by a jury of his peers,” prosecutor Brian Wice said. “We look forward to going to trial and seeking justice on behalf of the people of Texas.”

SPECIAL REPORT: Is Ken Paxton’s legal trouble motivated by politics?

A Collin County grand jury last year indicted Paxton on two securities fraud charges accusing him of touting Servergy Inc. without revealing to potential investors that the McKinney tech company was paying him to push its stock. The first-degree felonies carry a penalty of up to 99 years in prison, though probation is common for many first-time, white-collar convictions.

A third charge accused Paxton of failing to register with state securities regulators, a third-degree felony.

A conviction for any felony would require Paxton to step down as attorney general, the top lawyer for state government.

RELATED: Ken Paxton campaign takes in almost $945,000, signaling an aggressive re-election effort

The legal setback came five days after Paxton prevailed in civil court when a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that accused Paxton of fraud in his dealings with Servergy investors.

U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant III said the SEC’s allegations weren’t recognized under federal securities law, which he said didn’t require Paxton to disclose his deal with Servergy. The decision had no effect on the criminal charges against Paxton.

Mazzant gave the agency until Oct. 21 to amend its lawsuit if it can find “additional facts” to support its accusations. The SEC — which was seeking fines and an order for Paxton to repay “ill-gotten gains” from the Servergy deals — also could appeal Mazzant’s decision.

According to the SEC’s lawsuit, Paxton secured $840,000 in Servergy investments from five people, including state Rep. Byron Cook, R-Corsicana, and received 100,000 shares of private Servergy stock, worth $1 each, in compensation for his recruiting efforts.

NEWS STRAIGHT TO YOUR INBOX: Click here to get our Morning Headlines email

In the criminal case, Paxton’s lawyers told the Court of Criminal Appeals that he shouldn’t have to stand trial on the charges because he was indicted in 2015 by a Collin County grand jury that was improperly formed by a state district judge.

In addition, defense lawyers argued that Paxton couldn’t be charged with failing to register with state regulators because the law is unconstitutionally vague and because he was representing a company that had registered with the SEC, superseding his need to register with the state.

Paxton’s trial judge and the Dallas-based 5th Court of Appeals rejected versions of those arguments during previous attempts to dismiss the indictments.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Texas News & Politics

State panel suspends Williamson County Judge Dan Gattis over threat
State panel suspends Williamson County Judge Dan Gattis over threat

The Texas Commission on Judicial Conduct has suspended Williamson County Judge Dan Gattis from judicial duties with pay, said county spokeswoman Connie Odom. The suspension was in connection to an official oppression charge filed against Gattis, she said. It will not keep him from doing his job because he performs administrative duties in the county...
Austin school district launches clear bag policy at athletic events
Austin school district launches clear bag policy at athletic events

The Austin school district announced Friday a clear bag policy at athletic events that officials say is meant to enhance safety and security for athletes and spectators. The policy, set to begin Aug. 30, will be enforced at Burger Stadium, Delco Center, House Park, Nelson Field and Noack Sports Complex. It could be expanded in the future to include...
8 officers shoot, kill man who ran at them with gun, police say
8 officers shoot, kill man who ran at them with gun, police say

The sound of gunfire reverberated on Sixth Street on a busy back-to-school weekend and sent crowds scrambling as eight Austin officers shot and killed a 21-year-old man who was carrying a gun and ran toward them early Friday, police officials said. Family members said the man was Aquantis Givens, a rapper from Baton Rouge, La., who was performing Thursday...
Appeals court tosses 3 UT professors’ lawsuit challenging campus carry
Appeals court tosses 3 UT professors’ lawsuit challenging campus carry

A federal appeals court has rejected three University of Texas professors’ claims that the state’s campus carry law and its implementation by the university violate their constitutional rights. Jennifer Lynn Glass, Lisa Moore and Mia Carter argued that their First Amendment right to academic freedom has been violated because free speech...
City sued in Texas Supreme Court regarding CodeNext ballot language
City sued in Texas Supreme Court regarding CodeNext ballot language

CodeNext might be dead, but litigation regarding the controversial land-use rewrite is alive and well. On Friday, a petitioner sued the city of Austin in the Texas Supreme Court concerning ballot language tied to the now-abandoned comprehensive rewrite of the city’s land-use rules. The suit marked the second time this week that a petitioner represented...
More Stories