Austin follows through on lawsuit to block ‘sanctuary cities’ ban


Highlights

The city of Austin filed suit Friday to join onto a suit filed Thursday against Senate Bill 4.

Multiple lawsuits now challenge the state’s ability to create so-called immigration law.

The suits also allege SB 4 violates numerous other provisions in the Constitution.

The city of Austin followed through on a promise to challenge the state’s controversial “sanctuary cities” ban on Friday with a court filing that now unites it with the city of San Antonio and numerous advocacy groups in their fight to block Senate Bill 4 before it takes effect.

Calling Austin’s public safety a political football state lawmakers kicked around the Capitol that ultimately resulted in a dangerous law, Austin Mayor Steve Adler said it was time to move the fight to a different venue.

“We want our day in court,” Adler said.

SB 4 creates civil and criminal penalties for police and elected officials — including arrest or removal from office — if they block cooperation with federal requests to detain jail inmates suspected of being in the country illegally. It also allows police to inquire about a person’s immigration status during routine police encounters, such as traffic stops.

Gov. Greg Abbott signed the bill last month and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Austin hours later in what many saw as a pre-emptive strike to have a judge declare the law constitutional. Though Austin was destined to defend itself in federal court over SB 4, joining San Antonio’s suit against the law allows the cities to argue it should be blocked.

Austin’s legal challenge, which the City Council voted to pursue last month, takes the form of a “complaint in intervention” that allows the city to join a suit that San Antonio filed in federal court on Thursday. The city and county of El Paso have sued along with the town of El Cenizo, Maverick County and numerous advocacy groups.

As the legal challenges to SB 4 have rolled in, a consensus of arguments against the law is beginning to emerge.

The central challenge in both Austin and San Antonio’s filings has been against the state’s ability to create immigration laws, a power the U.S. Constitution reserves for the federal government in part so foreign governments don’t end up dealing with a patchwork of immigration laws.

That part of the Constitution was cited in a 2012 Supreme Court ruling that blocked several parts of Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070, a law with a section similar to SB 4’s “show me your papers” provision that empowers local law enforcement to inquire about a person’s immigration status during routine interactions.

The lawsuits also say SB 4 violates the Fourth Amendment because it could lead to jail detentions for immigration violations, which are civil infractions, not criminal offenses. The cities also argue that SB 4 might violate elected officials’ First Amendment rights because it bars them from endorsing sanctuary policies, a provision critics believe is overly vague.

Several 14th Amendment violations are alleged along with claims that the law would encourage racial profiling and discrimination.

“The result of the threatened implementation of SB 4 has been a breakdown in public trust, as affected individuals feel they cannot contact municipal and nongovernmental agencies for fear of immigration enforcement,” Austin’s suit said.

The city’s filing on Friday states that Austin would suffer economic harm if the bill is allowed to take effect. The city could see a drop in international tourism for the South by Southwest Festival and Circuit of the Americas events because visitors might fear enhanced immigration enforcement measures, the filing says. The state could also face boycotts like Arizona did after that state passed its controversial law in 2010.

The Austin filing also states that local policing could suffer. It posits that a police officer might be forced under the law to assist federal immigration authorities performing operations in Austin while a more urgent public safety matter might be unfolding because the law prohibits local police from refusing to assist federal authorities in any instance.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Texas News & Politics

JUST IN: SWAT team at Pflugerville home Saturday for ‘barricaded subject’
JUST IN: SWAT team at Pflugerville home Saturday for ‘barricaded subject’

A SWAT team has been called to a home in Pflugerville on Saturday morning after receiving reports of a barricaded person inside, Austin police said.  Authorities said U.S. Marshals are at the home, and the person is refusing to come out. Media reports say the home is in the 14500 block of Harris Ridge Boulevard.  Police did not have further...
NYC postal worker arrested after police find 17,000 pieces of undelivered mail
NYC postal worker arrested after police find 17,000 pieces of undelivered mail

A New York City postal worker was arrested Thursday after 17,000 pieces of undelivered mail were found in his car, apartment and locker, authorities said. Aleksey Germash, who has worked for the U.S. Postal Service for more than 16 years, possessed undelivered mail since 2005, WPIX reported. He told investigators he held onto the mail because...
Trump rips New York Times reporter, defends Cohen
Trump rips New York Times reporter, defends Cohen

President Donald Trump came out swinging on Twitter Saturday morning, firing off three tweets attacking The New York Times and reporter Maggie Haberman. A story published Friday in the Times -- written by Haberman, Sharon LaFraniere and Danny Hakim -- suggested that Trump’s personal attorney, Michael Cohen might cooperate with federal...
FORECAST: Showers possible Saturday in Austin, some storms could be severe
FORECAST: Showers possible Saturday in Austin, some storms could be severe

Showers are possible Saturday in Austin and some storms in Central Texas could become severe, producing hail and damaging winds, the National Weather Service said. Meteorologists put rain chances in Austin at 40 percent Saturday in the day and 20 percent at night. Forecasters say some storms stretching from east of Llano to Hallettsville could...
Queen Elizabeth turns 92: 5 fun facts
Queen Elizabeth turns 92: 5 fun facts

Queen Elizabeth II turned 92 on Saturday, and after 65 years on the throne, she holds the distinction of ruling longer than any monarch in the United Kingdom’s history.  The queen actually celebrates two birthdays each year: her actual birthday, which is April 21; and one in June when she hosts a parade -- weather permitting -- called &ldquo...
More Stories