Prosecutors’ appeal accepted in Ken Paxton criminal case


State’s highest criminal court will review ruling that drastically cut pay for prosecutors in Ken Paxton case.

Unpaid since January 2016, appointed prosecutors have said they would be forced to quit if money withheld.

Texas Attorney General Paxton is accused of securities fraud and failing to register with state regulators.

In a ruling that keeps alive, at least for now, the criminal prosecution against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, the state’s highest criminal court announced Wednesday that it will determine whether the prosecutors in the case can be paid $300 an hour for their work.

Unpaid since January 2016, the three prosecutors have said they will step aside if denied the payments, potentially putting at risk the case against Paxton, who is accused of securities fraud and failing to register with state regulators in private business deals in 2011 and 2012.

Wednesday’s decision, announced without comment, means the Court of Criminal Appeals will review an August opinion by the Dallas-based 5th Court of Appeals, which said state law and local rules limit payments to a pre-established amount for appointed defense lawyers or prosecutors.

In Paxton’s case, pay would be limited to $1,000 per prosecutor for pretrial work, instead of $300 an hour as negotiated with a Collin County state District Court judge who appointed them.

The 5th Court’s ruling voided an invoice for $205,191 for work done in 2016 by the three prosecutors. A bill for 2017 work has not been submitted.

The ruling did not affect $242,025 that Collin County paid for work done in 2015, although county commissioners have said they might take legal action to force prosecutors to repay most of that money.

Prosecutor Brian Wice said he and other prosecutors were gratified that the court accepted a case that will have an impact on “trial judges, prosecutors and defense attorneys across Texas.”

“We remain convinced the court will reaffirm the fundamental principle that fair trials with reliable results are impossible unless trial judges have the inherent discretion … to fairly and adequately compensate defense attorneys and special prosecutors willing to take on the most complex and high-profile criminal cases,” Wice said in a written statement.

Collin County commissioners had challenged the fees as excessive, and County Judge Keith Self said he was consulting with lawyers on the implications of Wednesday’s court action.

“We continue to be concerned about the cost of the case, and we will continue to pursue some sort of relief from payments that don’t seem to meet state law,” Self said.

The nine-judge, all-Republican Court of Criminal Appeals will not hear oral arguments or accept additional briefs in the case before issuing its ruling. The court does not have a deadline to act.

Paxton’s trial on the failure to register charge, previously set for Dec. 11, was postponed in October, and a new date has not been set.

Extraordinary case?

The criminal case against Paxton, who was indicted by a Collin County grand jury in the summer of 2015, has long been mired in a side issue over payments to prosecutors Kent Schaffer, Nicole DeBorde and Wice.

The three Houston lawyers were appointed to serve as special prosecutors after Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis, a friend and former business partner of Paxton’s, stepped aside from an investigation into Paxton’s business deals in April 2015.

Paxton’s lawyers tried unsuccessfully to drastically cut the $300-an-hour fees during pretrial motions. Also, several unsuccessful lawsuits to cut the prosecutors’ pay were filed by a North Texas developer who has donated to Paxton’s campaigns.

But a complaint by the Commissioners Court in Collin County, where Paxton lives and which he represented during 10 years in the Texas House and two years as a state senator, finally broke through in August when the 5th Court of Appeals stepped in.

Paxton’s prosecutors had argued that Collin County’s indigent defense plan properly divided criminal matters into two categories — ordinary cases that fell under the normal attorney fee schedule and extraordinary cases that allowed judges to set special compensation rates.

The 5th Court of Appeals, however, ruled that the Texas Fair Defense Act does not give judges the power to exceed fee schedules, even for extraordinary cases.

The law created fee schedules to ensure that appointed lawyers and prosecutors are paid fair, but not excessive, rates while allowing county commissioners to more accurately plan for budget needs, the court said.

Potential impact

A state law passed in 2015 also bars judges from appointing special prosecutors in cases involving public officials after a district attorney steps aside.

The bill’s author, Rep. Phil King, R-Weatherford, said the change was made to save money and add accountability.

“Special prosecutors are so incredibly expensive, and these investigations often go on for very long periods of time,” King said Wednesday. “A DA, selected by the people to prosecute crimes, has a great deal of ethical responsibility to the public … that comes with a great deal of accountability.”

Although the law does not apply to Paxton’s case because it involves allegations that occurred before the statute took effect, King said the change applies to future cases, limiting the potential impact of a court decision in Paxton’s case.

The state’s leading criminal defense organization, however, warned the Court of Criminal Appeals that more is at stake than pay for prosecutors.

The Texas Fair Defense Act also applies to appointed defense lawyers, and any ruling limiting the law could endanger the system for ensuring that indigent defendants are represented by competent lawyers, particularly in difficult cases, the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association told the court in a brief.

And, although the association asked to withdraw the brief, saying it was submitted without procedures being followed, the court never acted on that motion and instead told lawyers last week to submit written copies to distribute to the judges.

Paxton is unopposed in the March Republican primary as he seeks a second term to lead a large agency that defends the state in legal cases, ensures child-support obligations are met and enforces consumer-protection and open-government laws, among other responsibilities.

Democrat Justin Nelson, an Austin lawyer, will oppose Paxton in the November 2018 general election.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Local

Longer live music hours on Red River will remain in place
Longer live music hours on Red River will remain in place

Longer live music hours on Red River Street will stay for good, after a yearlong test that drew widespread praise and support. Austin City Council members agreed unanimously Thursday to permanently allow venues in the Red River Cultural District, between Sixth and 12th streets, to play amplified music until midnight on Thursdays and 1 a.m. on weekends...
The wonders of wheatgrass
The wonders of wheatgrass

Texas State University student Tristan Yeoward, right, and San Marcos resident Mark West discuss the health benefits of wheatgrass on Saturday at the weekly Farmer’s Market at the Square downtown. Yeoward is a student volunteer for Enactus, a global nonprofit group that offers opportunities in leadership, teamwork and communication skills through...
Is Austin training police to be too aggressive? 10 ex-cadets say yes.
Is Austin training police to be too aggressive? 10 ex-cadets say yes.

Summer Spisak walked into the Austin police training academy in May for her first day, knowing the next eight months would push her to the brink. The 38-year-old former tech employee was ready for a career change — a job that would test her physical and mental stamina. What happened during the next two months left her defeated and disappointed...
Three candidates running for two San Marcos school board seats
Three candidates running for two San Marcos school board seats

Three candidates are in the running for two open positions on the San Marcos CISD Board of Trustees. Incumbents Anne Halsey and school board vice president John McGlothlin are running for two at-large seats in the May 5 election, as is challenger James McCutcheon. Halsey, who is the mother of three children in the San Marcos district, said the school...
NEW DETAILS: Vehicle crashes into wall at Oracle campus in Southeast Austin, EMS says
NEW DETAILS: Vehicle crashes into wall at Oracle campus in Southeast Austin, EMS says

One person is being evaluated after a vehicle crashed into a wall at the Oracle campus in Southeast Austin on Thursday afternoon, Austin-Travis County EMS said. Medics responded at 1:41 p.m. to a vehicle-building crash in the 2300 block of South Lakeshore Boulevard near East Riverside Drive.  EMS officials say they are evaluating a possible medical...
More Stories