VIEWPOINTS: New tax code is harsh on nonprofits. How Texans can help

When local, state and federal programs fail to serve Central Texas families and individuals who are the most in need, local nonprofit organizations help fill the gaps by using the generous contributions of those who find value in giving their neighbors a hand up when they need it. The recent federal tax overhaul, however, has nonprofits bracing for a significant decline in contributions because millions of people are expected to lose incentives to give.

The law, according to estimates from the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy, will decrease charitable giving to nonprofits by at least $13 billion, or 4.5 percent. Smaller local nonprofits and churches could get hit the hardest.

That’s troubling because charitable donations by individuals are vital to the sustainability of a nonprofit organization. Through donations, local groups help feed the hungry, shelter the homeless and open doors of opportunity. They respond to disasters like Hurricane Harvey, which devastated the Gulf Coast and vast swaths of Southeast Texas, and provide services to the sick and the poor.

GIVING CITY: New nonprofit aims to increase nonprofit diversity.

“There will be (taxpayer) confusion. Donations will be down the first quarter of the year because people won’t know the real impact of the overall changes,” said Stacy Ehrlich, founder of Seeds for Change Consulting in Austin. “Confusion quickly becomes doubt — and that doubt becomes inertia.”

Now is not the time to slow down giving — not when government programs and services are being reduced. The role of local nonprofits — there are more than 900,000 in Texas alone — is more important than ever before. They need our continued support.

Traditionally, tax credits have encouraged philanthropists big and small to give. In 2017, American generosity translated to more than $390 billion in donations to U.S. charities, according to the annual Giving USA report.

That’s a lot of money, but a closer look reveals reasons for concern: Itemized charitable tax deductions from donors making $100,000 or more a year increased by 40 percent from 2005 to 2015, according to the Institute for Policy Studies. Yet, deductions during the same 10-year period from middle-income donors making less than $100,000 a year declined by 34 percent.

The trend is reason for concern because wealthy donors – who make up a small fraction of the country’s population — tend to give to larger charities and foundations. Smaller nonprofits rely on contributions from average, working-class citizens to stay afloat.

SEASON FOR CARING: Charity drive breaks record with donations.

Receiving credit for supporting good causes is one reason why charitable contributions are among the most popular deductions that taxpayers report on their returns. The credit motivated many Americans to keep track of donations they made throughout the year to later report, or itemize, when they filed their return.

Though the new tax law simplifies the need for itemization, it could spell trouble for nonprofits.

Consider that the new law nearly doubles standard deductions for 2019 tax filings, from $6,350 to $12,000 for individuals, and from $12,700 to $24,000 for married couples. Taxpayers can only deduct charitable donations if they itemize. But under the new law, millions of people won’t have total deductions exceeding the new standards. For them, itemizing won’t make sense when they file next year.

A new estate tax exemption could also cause problems. Prior to the new tax code, as large portions of their estates were taxed, wealthy individuals were encouraged to make charitable donations in part because donations were not taxed.

Under the new tax reform law, the new estate exemption changes the game for the wealthiest Americans, who could give less to charities — up to $7.8 billion less by 2024, by one study’s account — and instead give much more to their heirs, experts say.

Donations from middle-income earners could also decrease, analysts say, because the new law sets a $10,000 cap on the deductible limit for state and local incomes, and sales and property taxes. In Texas — which has no state income tax but higher property taxes than the national average — the cap could mean a tax increase on high-income taxpayers with pricey homes.

Local philanthropic groups won’t know for some time the impact tax reform will have, but Central Texans should provide reassurance.

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: Viewpoints delivers the latest perspectives on current events.

We encourage you to find a local organization that focuses on the causes that are important to you. Identify groups that make our communities stronger and find out what you can do to help. There are plenty here who fight the good fight.

Thousands of people with disadvantages count on nonprofits — and they are counting on us. Let’s send them the message through our donations that Congress may have given little thought to how our local safety nets will be affected by the tax overhaul – but Texans won’t turn a blind eye.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Facebook comments: March 23, 2018
Facebook comments: March 23, 2018

Austin-based Bumble is being sued by Match Group, Tinder’s parent company, which accuses it of patent infringement and stealing trade secrets, according to a report by 512tech reporter Lori Hawkins. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, alleges that Bumble’s app is virtually identical to Tinder, which...
Opinion: Did Putin order the Salisbury hit?

Britain has yet to identify the assassin who tried to murder the double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter, Yulia, in Salisbury, England. But Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson knows who ordered the hit. “We think it overwhelmingly likely that it was (Russian President Vladimir Putin’s) decision to direct the use of a nerve agent on the...
Opinion: The principle behind anti-Trump pragmatism

WASHINGTON — Former Rep. Barney Frank and the writer William F. Buckley Jr. could hardly have been more at odds in their political views. The Massachusetts Democrat remains a staunch liberal while Buckley was the intellectual founder of modern conservatism. But they had something important in common: Each wanted his side to win elections and...
Bomber is dead, but case not over with many questions that linger
Bomber is dead, but case not over with many questions that linger

Central Texans are exhaling a collective sigh of relief at the news that suspected serial bomber Mark A. Conditt is dead. For much of March, the 23-year-old Pflugerville resident held the city captive as it held its breath awaiting the next explosion. In all, five bombs detonated, not counting the one he turned on himself early Wednesday morning. Add...
Young: This week on: ‘(U.S.) House Makeover’
Young: This week on: ‘(U.S.) House Makeover’

The Republican Party just spent $10 million on one congressional election in Pennsylvania and reaped nothing but agony. What it spent amounted to $100 per vote cast for the loser (Donald Trump). You might claim that the loser in Pennsylvania’s congressional District 18 was Rick Saccone, who lost to Democrat Conor Lamb. That’s true technically...
More Stories