Two Views: Listen to teachers and scholars this time


The long-running debate over what Texas public schools should teach students about evolution is one of the State Board of Education’s most counterproductive and embarrassing controversies.

It threatens to undermine the education of our kids and makes the state look like an education backwater. But here we go again.

Board members in 2009 added to the state’s science curriculum standards a number of requirements creationists hoped would undermine instruction on evolution in textbooks and classrooms.

At the same time, the board made those standards so detailed and confusing that teachers have voiced frustration with how to cover them all. Late last year it agreed to “streamline” the standards.

This week, board members will consider recommendations from teachers and scholars tasked with that job. For the sake of our kids, they should respect the knowledge and expertise of those professionals.

The board didn’t do that eight years ago. Teachers and scientists practically begged the board not to insert misguided and misleading requirements challenging evolution in the standards.

Don McLeroy, a Bryan dentist who at the time served as the state board’s chair, led the charge to do it anyway.

A self-described biblical creationist, McLeroy insisted that “somebody’s got to stand up to experts.” He even argued that science classrooms should include instruction on “supernatural” explanations for various phenomena.

The board-approved standards echoed a number of discredited creationist arguments – in particular, that the fossil record and other evidence don’t support evolution.

Scientists have repeatedly shown that such arguments are just plain wrong. More than a century of scientific research has revealed overwhelming evidence supporting evolution. Many people of faith accept this evidence and see no conflict between their religious beliefs and the science of evolution.

But the opposition of McLeroy and other deniers of evolution is absolute. Now they are criticizing the science teachers on the streamlining committee for supposedly plotting to defend the teaching of evolution in the 21st century. They have even complained that the committee’s changes would somehow limit the ability of students to ask questions in their science classes. That’s simply not true.

It has been disturbing to hear such attacks on the educators and scholars who volunteered to serve on the committee. Even more appalling is that one of the critics, Board Member Barbara Cargill, the Woodlands Republican who last year pressured Texas Education Agency staff to include a prominent evolution denier on the committee. In an email obtained through an open records request, TEA’s professional staff respectfully told Cargill that the person she wanted was unqualified — but he ended up with a spot on the committee anyway.

The committee’s teachers have pointed out that the problematic standards they want to remove are confusing, duplicative and needlessly time-consuming. Educators responding to a Texas Education Agency survey last fall largely echoed those sentiments.

Frankly, they want politicians to stop forcing them to waste precious classroom time with misleading requirements designed to confuse their students.

State board members have the political authority to accept or reject the committee’s recommendations. But let’s be clear: It makes no sense to appoint teachers and scholars to streamline the curriculum standards if board members will reject their recommendations because they simply don’t like them or have ideological objections.

Rejecting the committee’s recommendations would send a message that this board – just like the board in 2009 – doesn’t really care what teachers and scholars have to say. Board members would be saying they care more about promoting their own personal beliefs than making sure Texas kids get a 21st-century education.

They would, in McLeroy’s careless words, be “standing up to experts.” It would not be a proud moment for Texas.

Our kids deserve far better.

Miller is president of the Texas Freedom Network, a public education and religious liberties watchdog based in Austin.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Commentary: Austin’s plastic bag ban is rubbish. Go check the landfill
Commentary: Austin’s plastic bag ban is rubbish. Go check the landfill

As the Texas Supreme Court will soon make its decision regarding the legality of plastic bag regulations in Texas, this is a good time to revisit the arguments used to promote plastic bag bans. A review of the data shows that plastic bag regulations don’t reduce litter overall — and, in fact, they incentivize products that have far greater...
Opinion: How Trump gets into your bed

It’s not every day we start our discussion of current events with the president’s sex life. Well, actually, it’s gotten to be pretty frequent. But today we’re going to talk less about what Donald Trump does in bed and more about his efforts to interfere with other people’s intimate affairs. “When I ran for office...
Opinion: Trump is proving to be most pro-life president in history

WASHINGTON — President Trump’s critics were apoplectic last week when the president referred to MS-13 gang members as “animals.” Of course, no one should be dehumanized. Yet many of the same people expressing outrage that Trump would dehumanize vicious gang members have no problem dehumanizing innocent, unborn children. Trump...
Commentary: With shootings and small checks, why would anyone teach?
Commentary: With shootings and small checks, why would anyone teach?

The optimism of graduation season was mixed this year with the tragedy of another school shooting, this time in Santa Fe, Texas. Among the 10 victims were two teachers. While we mourn the loss of our nation’s youths to school shootings, we should also wonder how the prevalence of gun violence will impact college graduates’ decision to enter...
Commentary: Don’t leave it to just veterans to honor America’s fallen
Commentary: Don’t leave it to just veterans to honor America’s fallen

What are you planning to do this Memorial Day? What is the day for? Why was it created? Despite a long tradition of public promises that those who give their lives fighting for their families, cities and countries will live on in communal memory, human hearts and minds can stand only so much. Memories fade. When our society does not bear the burdens...
More Stories