Two Views: Liberals eager to pounce on Kavanaugh. Or anyone, really


President Donald Trump recently announced his appointment to fill the vacated United States Supreme Court seat: Brett Kavanaugh, a judge who sits on the U.S. Supreme Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Almost immediately, Outrage, Inc. — left-wing advocates and their allies — fired up their hyperbole machine and argued that Kavanaugh would send us to the end of days. What has been the result of this initial bluster and saber-rattling? Not much. The manufactured character hits have ultimately harmed the left’s credibility and increased support for Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the United States Supreme Court.

What are these disqualifying revelations that Outrage, Inc. discovered? Apparently, there are three: First, his name is Brett; second, he likes beer; and third, he enjoys baseball. Immediately, upon the announcement of Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, NARAL – a pro-choice advocacy organization – tweeted outrage about the Supreme Court being five men, “including some frat-boy named Brett.” Setting aside the hypocrisy of name-shaming from the left, constructive discourse on emotional outbursts is unproductive. Moving on.

In his high-school yearbook, Kavanaugh listed himself — amongst other things, presumably — as the secretary-treasurer of the “Keg City Club – 100 Kegs or Bust.” While the comment shows a lack of maturity, it is not relevant to someone whom, at 53 years of age, wrote it 35 years ago. Next.

TWO VIEWS: Let’s look at the path where Kavanaugh will take America.

The final critique is that Kavanaugh accrued “tens of thousands of dollars of debt” on Nationals baseball tickets “over the last decade.” He then paid off that debt. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell recently summed up this argument perfectly from the Senate floor: “In a breaking news, bombshell report … we learned that Judge Kavanaugh enjoys America’s pastime. Investigative reporters scoured his financial disclosures and learned that he and his friends buy tickets to baseball games and that he pays his bills.” McConnell is not a fan of Trump. This faux-outrage forced McConnell to publicly defend the pick, increasing the probability of Senate confirmation.

In perhaps the most egregious example of credibility-killing outrage, the Women’s March put out a news release condemning President Trump’s appointee, forgetting to remove the placeholder for the nominee’s name. The news release condemned Trump’s nomination of “XX,” not Judge Kavanaugh. By doing so, they exposed the fact that the release had been written prior to his nomination, and would have been the exact same regardless of the nominee. This predisposed outrage undermines any argument on the judicial temperament of Kavanaugh and discredits any notion that the outrage was not manufactured.

SEND A LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Click this link to send us your thoughts.

Now that the dust is beginning to settle following Trump’s announcement, we can look beyond the faux outrage to discover the real Brett Kavanaugh. Yale law professor Akhil Reed Amar, in an editorial in the New York Times titled “A Liberal’s Case for Brett Kavanaugh,” says we have learned a lot. Kavanaugh commands wide and deep respect among scholars, lawyers and jurists. Except for Judge Merrick Garland, no one has sent more of his law clerks to clerk for the justices of the Supreme Court — and his clerks have clerked for justices across the ideological spectrum. Amar also explains why terms like “constitutional originalism” should be not be worrisome in this case.

The public’s growing understanding of the character of Kavanaugh has muted the voice of Outrage, Inc. and increased bipartisan support of his confirmation to the Supreme Court. Despite millions of dollars being spent by left-wing advocacy groups to prevent the confirmation of Trump’s appointee, several swing-vote senators, including moderate Republicans and red-state Democrats, have indicated support for the pick. A handful of Democrats in support of Kavanaugh will be more than enough. Although Republicans hold a thin 51-49 lead in the Senate, they only need 50 votes to confirm Kavanaugh.

When left-wing advocates cry foul over minutia, it pushes voters to see past self-serving fundraising efforts and understand the need for a judge like Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court. Maybe if the left would attempt education prior to saber-rattling, rational discourse could again return to the national political sphere. Until then, Republicans will gladly continue accepting the votes from the disenfranchised Democrat electorate — and their senators.

Brannan, an Austin attorney, is principal of the Brannan Firm.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: Sept. 25, 2018
Letters to the editor: Sept. 25, 2018

Query: What are the Republican senators and Chuck Grassley afraid of? What is President Donald Trump afraid of? They all do not want an FBI investigation into the events leading to the accusation of sexual assault, attempted rape of Dr. Ford, by then-high school student Brett Kavanaugh. Why? Many years ago, during another Supreme Court Justice Senate...
Commentary: Fathers need to remember that their sons are watching

CHICAGO — What’s it like to be a boy these days? It’s a frequent thought for me as I navigate my son’s 17th year of life in a world where the scourge of toxic masculinity shares the public consciousness with admiration of spectacularly muscled sports stars and big-screen superheroes whose worth is predicated on their physical...
Facebook comments: Sept. 25, 2018

Recently the American-Statesman’s Lori Hawkins and Shonda Novak gave an update on development on South Congress Avenue, where a number of construction projects are under way. Some of the projects include The Magdalena, a Liz Lambert hotel under construction at Music Lane and Academy Drive with a projected fall 2019 opening; Saint Vincent, a three-story...
Opinion: The burden of proof for Kavanaugh

Last week, I wrote a column taking the view that conservatives supporting Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court because they hope he will overturn Roe v. Wade should be willing to encourage his withdrawal if his accuser testifies credibly against him and the cloud over his nomination can’t be expeditiously cleared up. Even if...
Opinion: Is Senate committee equipped to grasp Kavanaugh allegations?

For all their well-learned politesse, the Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have scarcely been able to conceal their determination to get Christine Blasey Ford out of their hair. Ford is the last obstacle to confirming conservative Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. And she’s a formidable one. She has alleged...
More Stories