Letters to the editor: Sept. 3, 2018

Concerning the front-page article about the right to stand or kneel or anything during the National Anthem, the opinions are off-base. This is about the rights of the employer at his workplace.

I believe the employer should have the right to make reasonable rules concerning behavior at their workplace. The workplace is not for the employee to exert their constitutional right to free speech.

If you are on the clock (being paid by me), then company rules are in effect. If you want to sit on the ground during the national anthem out in a public setting when not on my payroll, by all means.

Beto O’Rourke: I cannot vote for Ted Cruz; but unless you clarify your position about it being a workplace issue, I cannot vote for you either.


I, too, would like U.S. Rep. Roger Williams to have town-hall-style meetings.

Williams has touted his experience as a business owner, and the December 2017 tax bill, as a positive for working people.

I would ask the following related questions of Williams:

• Did his employees across the board receive a raise or bonus from Williams’ company this year?

• Does his company, as a benefit, pay all his employees health care? His employees’ spouses? Children?


Re: Aug. 29 commentary, “The Army? Austin? Say hello to the odd couple.

The headline to Ken Herman’s column read, “The Army? Austin? Say hello to the odd couple.” And a local news station interviewed a CEO who said that landing the Army Futures Command center was “bigger” than getting Amazon’s headquarters.

Huh? If we win the Amazon decision, it will be a big deal for Austin, and hosting the Army Futures Command Center will be an even bigger deal?

Amazon answers customer complaints and inquiries, requests feedback and values its relationship with users. Its mission may be capitalistic, but it isn’t dangerous — and its proposal was discussed at public meetings.

In contrast, the U.S. Army is not known for its customer care. There was no public discussion on bringing a military complex here, and we’ll never see a “How are we doing?” survey from them. Its organization and headquarters will be a black box, with a dark output.

Please, let’s all become watchdogs on the Futures Command in Austin.


A recent article in the Statesman reviewed the effort of car manufacturers to provide electric driven cars. The article provided much information about anticipated performance, cost and miles before recharging. One item not mentioned was the all-important carbon footprint.

True, electric cars will reduce the carbon footprint on the roadways. But, where would the energy for recharging come from? Will all of the sun and wind energy providers be enough? Additionally, what about the scenic scars caused by solar panels and wind towers and the transmission lines from these sources?

Some of the carbon footprint will be transferred to the Fayette County power plant. Some in Austin want this plant shut down. Then where will they get the energy to recharge their cars?

Will electric cars really help the environment?


A passage I read today from Nathaniel Philbrick’s book “Valiant Ambition: George Washington, Benedict Arnold, and the fate of the American Revolution” stuck out: “What made Arnold unique was the god-like inviolability he attached to his actions. He had immense respect for a man like Washington, but Arnold was, in the end, the leading personage in the drama that was his life.”

And, so, I was reminded of President Trump.


Concerning the upcoming midterm elections: We who did not vote Donald Trump for president are being warned in his red wave pipe dream, that we are violent, un-Christian, un-American and betting on the wrong horse.

Funny thing about life though is surprise always exceeds expectation. One can still hope with their vote.


Re: Aug. 28 article, “Cruz, O’Rourke haven’t agreed on debate terms, but Abbott, Valdez have.

As the term “liberal” has been co-opted by the right to be a catch-all pejorative for anything that doesn’t have the Republican Seal of Dogmatic Approval, they sometimes forget what the word actually means.

In the article about the Greg Abbott and Lupe Valdez debates, Abbott’s spokesperson accuses Lupe Valdez of “being liberal with the truth.”

In this context, that would mean abundant, generous or lavish with the truth. As this is rare for a politician and unheard of from Abbott, how will she ever live it down?


Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: Sept. 25, 2018
Letters to the editor: Sept. 25, 2018

Query: What are the Republican senators and Chuck Grassley afraid of? What is President Donald Trump afraid of? They all do not want an FBI investigation into the events leading to the accusation of sexual assault, attempted rape of Dr. Ford, by then-high school student Brett Kavanaugh. Why? Many years ago, during another Supreme Court Justice Senate...
Commentary: Fathers need to remember that their sons are watching

CHICAGO — What’s it like to be a boy these days? It’s a frequent thought for me as I navigate my son’s 17th year of life in a world where the scourge of toxic masculinity shares the public consciousness with admiration of spectacularly muscled sports stars and big-screen superheroes whose worth is predicated on their physical...
Facebook comments: Sept. 25, 2018

Recently the American-Statesman’s Lori Hawkins and Shonda Novak gave an update on development on South Congress Avenue, where a number of construction projects are under way. Some of the projects include The Magdalena, a Liz Lambert hotel under construction at Music Lane and Academy Drive with a projected fall 2019 opening; Saint Vincent, a three-story...
Opinion: The burden of proof for Kavanaugh

Last week, I wrote a column taking the view that conservatives supporting Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court because they hope he will overturn Roe v. Wade should be willing to encourage his withdrawal if his accuser testifies credibly against him and the cloud over his nomination can’t be expeditiously cleared up. Even if...
Opinion: Is Senate committee equipped to grasp Kavanaugh allegations?

For all their well-learned politesse, the Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee have scarcely been able to conceal their determination to get Christine Blasey Ford out of their hair. Ford is the last obstacle to confirming conservative Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. And she’s a formidable one. She has alleged...
More Stories