Letters to the editor: July 13, 2018


From early New England colonies’ town hall meetings, where most citizens attended to decide what was best for their community, now we locals know what is best for our locality.

If our City Council votes support for sanctuary, a Texas Legislature that votes otherwise for our city is just wrong. If a community through its City Council votes to ban plastic bags, that ordinance counts for more than any state-level action, because a City Council knows what that city wants, but the state cannot.

Attorney General Ken Paxton and state government have been captured by an anti-woman, anti-abortion, anti-care-for-the-earth religion. The closer-to-home lawmaking best reflects the will of the people, while the more distant legislating least reflects the will of a local community. The Texas Legislature must stop trying to tell communities what they want.

JOHN F. YEAMAN, AUSTIN

Re: July 5 letter to the editor, “We have the right to reject abusers, racists.”

It is certainly the right of any individual to reject the thoughts and beliefs of those with whom he or she disagrees with, just as it is to reject the person as a whole from one’s personal sphere.

Rejecting an entire group — or groups — of people from the public domain by ostracizing them in those places is no one’s right, whether their beliefs are anathema or not. Practicing and promoting exclusion will not change people’s thinking, no matter on what side of the fence they sit. Listening with curiosity to their thinking is the better course to that end. We will never heal this rift by mimicking one another’s separatist, judgmental behaviors.

We do not have to associate on a personal level with those whose beliefs are reprehensible to us, and we do not have to exhibit reprehensible behavior to prove to them that we disagree. Being intolerant of intolerance produces a predictable outcome.

CAROLINE CHASE, AUSTIN

Presidents normally get to ride their predecessor’s momentum, good or bad, for their first year in office. After that, their new policies will determine at least the next three or four years.

Trumponomics are starting to take effect. In 2017 the U.S. national debt exceeded our gross domestic product for the first time since World War II, according to the Pew Research Center. Eight years of slow-but-steady recovery yielded record corporate profits with full employment. America was doing great economically — until Trump moved into the White House.

Trump’s latest brainstorm is a trade war, again against the advice of his staff, advisors and basically everyone with the guts to disagree with him. His attacks on our closest trading partners hurt U.S. companies and consumers. Our self-described economic genius has recorded six bankruptcies. His lenders, suppliers and employees all lost out; American taxpayers, consumers and U.S. manufacturers will be his next victims.

RALPH LAKE, AUSTIN

Justice nominees must declare their relationship with the staunch Federalist Society.

The group promotes the separation of powers emphasizing an independent judiciary. This is contrary to the goals of our Constitution, which states, “We the People … must promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”

Justice nominees must be unbiased and care about the welfare of present and future generations. Confirming biased, Republican judges makes the U.S. a one-party state.

Regarding abortions, justice nominees must acknowledge that 19th-century laws prohibiting them were wrong. Indeed, the billions of illegal abortions women endured in recent decades were necessary to avert devastating overpopulation, chaotic conditions and violence. Abortion restrictions are based on extremist religious doctrines, like laws in Saudi Arabia and Iran, and thus illegal in our secular country. In addition, government interference with abortions constitutes illegally practicing medicine, an exclusive duty and right of licensed medical professionals.

HEINZ AESCHBACH, PRESIDENT OF HUMANE CIVILIZATION WORLDWIDE, AUSTIN

Re: July 8 letter to the editor, “Migrant advocates: Put up or shut up.”

The letter offers a solution to another issue that seems to stir equal passions among the population: abortion.

To repurpose the writer’s statements, opponents of abortion — including politicians — should volunteer to raise unwanted babies, providing their shelter, food, clothing, medical care, education and any additional expenses and needs required until the child reaches adulthood. Anyone unwilling to do this has no right to protest or to restrict the choice of a woman who makes the difficult decision to have an abortion.

DEBRA BERLINER, AUSTIN

On the July Fourth, we watched as talented singers sang their hearts out with such beloved classics as Irving Berlin’s “God Bless America” and many others imploring someone named God to bless us, protect us and watch over us.

I also watched something recently that made my jaw drop. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a well-known liberal from California, criticized potential Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett for being far too religious. What? Berlin’s lyrics of a century ago — they’ve become sort of a catchy national jingle, right? Liberals can sing along to them, too, because their meaning have become empty and vague — just as we, their countrymen, have become.

GIL ROEBUCK, AUSTIN



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: The late hit on Judge Kavanaugh

Upon the memory and truthfulness of Christine Blasey Ford hangs the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, his reputation, and possibly his career on the nation’s second highest court. And much more. If Kavanaugh is voted down or forced to withdraw, the Republican Party and conservative movement could lose their last best hope for...
Opinion: Why the haste with Kavanaugh?

WASHINGTON — For those insisting that Republican senators take Christine Blasey Ford’s allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh seriously, one aspect of the conversation is particularly infuriating: the notion that the timeline established by the GOP for completing this process is quasi-sacred. Virtually everyone commenting on Kavanaugh&rsquo...
Letters to the editor: Sept. 20, 2018
Letters to the editor: Sept. 20, 2018

Re: Sept. 16 commentary, “Both-sideism presents more than journalistic problem.” Leonard Pitts raises an important structural issue in journalism related to fairness. Some would have us believe that ethical and moral considerations exist as mathematical equations. This inevitably leads to false equivalencies in which cultural values are...
Editorial: Hard liquor ban is first step in safer Greek life culture
Editorial: Hard liquor ban is first step in safer Greek life culture

Removing hard liquor from University of Texas fraternity houses and events is an important first step. But, the Greek organizations, university leaders and lawmakers looking to prevent drinking-related deaths and other tragedies, as well as dangerous hazing incidents, also need to add some things to the equation: Greater public transparency on whether...
Editorial: Hard liquor ban is first step in safer Greek life culture
Editorial: Hard liquor ban is first step in safer Greek life culture

Removing hard liquor from University of Texas fraternity houses and events is an important first step. But, the Greek organizations, university leaders and lawmakers looking to prevent drinking-related deaths and other tragedies, as well as dangerous hazing incidents, also need to add some things to the equation: Greater public transparency on whether...
More Stories