Re: Aug. 7 letter to the editor, “Do we need national search for library head?”
To the writer: Please tell me much you know about running a library in 2017. Tell me how qualified you are to manage a $47.4 million budget, over 400 employees and countless volunteers — and 1.8 million items in the collection. Tell me your knowledge of how to catalog items so they are easily accessible to patrons and how you would go about organizing the nearly 9,000 programs per year offered to the community.
And please share your plan to curate materials, programs and resources that fill the needs of a population diverse in age, culture and language. Tell me your experience providing and implementing technology and innovation in over 20 branches. Blair Parsons may well be qualified, but my most burning question is: Have you even been in a library since that 1991 episode of “Seinfeld”?
LISA LASCH, PFLUGERVILLE
The adage “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander” should apply to our legislators. When proposing legislation, they should be required to experience their legislation since, in my opinion, they often don’t fully understand the implications and consequences. And that often leads to unintended consequences that voters and government organizations, such as the police and education administrators, must then struggle to deal with.
In that regard, Sen. Lois Kolkhorst should dress as and take on a male persona, visit several highly attended venues and enter the ladies’ restroom. She might then change her position about being required to use the restroom consistent with her birth certificate. She should also enter the men’s restroom. She’d likely enter and leave without so much as a second glance.
Male-sponsored legislation should have same requirement.
HARLAN HIVELY, AUSTIN
Re: July 31 commentary, “Tree legislation brings Texas to the edge of anti-localism.”
The accusation that tree legislation would “grant all private property owners … the right to destroy and remove any tree of any age and size growing on their property” is false. The right to dispose of one’s own private property as one wishes is not something for the Legislature to grant; it is an inherent right of the property owner. This right to do as one wishes with their private property is safeguarded by the Texas Constitution, which provides that “no person’s property shall be taken, damaged, or destroyed for or applied to public use without adequate compensation being made.”
Rather than granting anything, the Legislature is acting to restore rights to property owners, which local tyranny has usurped. Restoring these rights secures our Texan values and squashes municipal tyranny like a bug.
J.D. RIMANN, AUSTIN
I see that Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick says what is wrong in Texas is that local voters get to choose their own governments and even elect Democrats. If he really feels that way — and hates the idea that the voters get to choose things of which he does not approve — why doesn’t he stand up and be honest and abolish elected local government? As long as you let those pesky, ignorant voters decide matters, Patrick, you are going to get things you won’t like. So, let the Legislature appoint local prefects to run things, that way he can be certain it will always be done his way.
After all, as Patrick and Gov. Greg Abbott have reminded us, there is nothing in the Texas Constitution that gives residents any “right” to have their own government, as they are all “creatures of the state.”
E. BRIAN GRAHAM, AUSTIN
An editorial published Aug. 8 stated that state Rep. Dawnna Dukes helped author a bill creating the Texas Children’s Health Insurance Program. She was not a co-author or sponsor, according to the Texas Legislature’s website. The editorial also incorrectly stated when CHIP was created. It was authorized in Texas in 1999.