Commentary: Why Texas should reject proposed changes to Title X

Access to contraception is one of the nation’s most important public health achievements over the past 100 years, contributing to better-timed and spaced pregnancies, which tend to be healthier and safer for mothers and babies and improves the economic status of women and their families.

But if newly proposed federal regulations take effect, millions of low-income people — including nearly 200,000 Texans — will find it much harder to obtain affordable contraception. Such a development would be unhealthy for them and for Texas in general.

On May 22, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced dramatic changes to the Title X, the only federal program dedicated to supporting family planning services. Since 1971, Title X has awarded grants to states and community entities to provide low-income, uninsured people — mostly women — access to preventive health care, including contraceptives.

UPDATE: Texas women’s health program makes gains amid declining participation.

Title X has benefited Texas families. Since its inception, Title X grant recipients have had to provide eligible women and men access to high-quality, client-centered care designed to help them plan their families. In 2016 alone, Title X served 183,000 Texans, preventing an estimated 41,090 unintended pregnancies, which means fewer unplanned births and fewer abortions.

Planned pregnancies are healthier for both mother and child, with earlier prenatal care and fewer low-birth-weight and pre-term births. Title X also has saved Texas taxpayers money — more than $7 in medical costs for every dollar spent on family planning.

RELATED: Teen pregnancy rate 5 times higher among Texas foster youth.

The proposed revisions to Title X regulations and funding deeply trouble maternal health advocates. Among major concerns, instead of providing women access to a comprehensive array of family planning options, Title X grantees would emphasize “natural family planning” and abstinence. While both are valid choices, they should not make more effective methods less available. Title X clinics should offer women a wide array of choices, including highly effective methods like implants and intrauterine devices.

Also under these new guidelines, HHS would no longer require clinics to provide “medically approved” forms of contraception. This decision could displace community clinics from the program in favor of “crisis pregnancy centers” — also known as “pregnancy resource centers” — with limited medical services, inaccurate reproductive health information, and limited or no contraception at all.

POLITICS: Could Trump restore money to Texas after Planned Parenthood defunding?

Rather, clinics that specialize in family planning are more likely to ensure patients have access to the full range of contraceptive methods and medical technology — while serving a higher volume of patients, often at lower cost per patient.

In Texas, we already have seen that diverting funds away from clinics that focus on family planning means fewer women are served.

In 2011, the Texas Legislature cut funding for women’s preventive health care services by two-thirds, which had devastating consequences: 82 preventive health clinics closed, and tens of thousands of women lost services. Thankfully, Texas lawmakers substantially restored funding, but the system still has not fully recovered.

We urge HHS to learn from Texas’ earlier mistake and reject the proposed changes to Title X. If enacted, these changes will erode important gains in Texas’ efforts to improve the lives of women and their families. We have come too far to turn back the clock.

Realini is chair of the Texas Women’s Healthcare Coalition.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Herman: In search of peace, quiet at the Texas Democratic Convention
Herman: In search of peace, quiet at the Texas Democratic Convention

Hype, hope and hoopla prevailed Friday at the Texas Democratic Convention, an event that exists for the purpose of hype, hope and hoopla. The energy was palpable, even in the morning caucus sessions of the various interest and demographic groups that make up the party. So where could one go for a brief respite from the masses for a few minutes of rest...
Editorial: Negotiate MLS stadium deal on Austin’s terms, not Precourt’s
Editorial: Negotiate MLS stadium deal on Austin’s terms, not Precourt’s

It’s easy to envision the benefits a Major League Soccer franchise could bring to Austin: a team that is a source of community pride, a stadium that is a gathering place for people from all over the city, matches that entertain thousands of fans and inspire a new generation of players, parklike grounds that provide a respite of green space in...
Letters to the editor: June 23, 2018
Letters to the editor: June 23, 2018

Greater Austin’s population will double, whether we like it or not. If we don’t densify the city’s core, we “sprawlify” the countryside: the Blackland Prairie, the Hill Country and the aquifer contributing zone. Take your choice. It is so much cheaper to add population where we already have the infrastructure — streets...
Grumet: Who’d want part-time MLS stadium jobs? You’d be surprised
Grumet: Who’d want part-time MLS stadium jobs? You’d be surprised

You may have noticed Austin’s economy is pretty awesome. “You’re rock stars in the world of employment,” David Schein, a business school professor at the University of St. Thomas in Houston told me, referring to our 2.8 percent unemployment rate. “Chicago, Columbus, Cleveland, the rest of the center of the country would...
She’s a TV star, but she’s still grappling with her parents’ deportation
She’s a TV star, but she’s still grappling with her parents’ deportation

The stories of migrant children — separated from their parents at the border, detained in makeshift facilities — has stirred something in all of us, but for Diane Guerrero, the feeling has been especially agonizing. When she was 14, Guerrero, the actress best known for her roles in “Orange Is the New Black” and “Jane the...
More Stories