Commentary: Why I support Travis County’s investment in parks


Recently, the Statesman’s editorial board encouraged voters to support Travis County Proposition A — bonds dedicated to transportation and flood mitigation projects in eastern Travis County. I agree wholeheartedly with that opinion. At the same time, they concluded the parks and open-space projects in Proposition B could wait until some point in the future. On this point, I respectfully but strongly disagree.

I was vice-chair of the 14-member Citizens Bond Advisory Committee created to recommend projects for this election. We spent six months analyzing the needs of Travis County residents and projects specifically designed to address those needs. We started with $1.1 billion of projects and whittled those down by 74 percent to $280 million of projects — the $184.9 million in Props A and B, and the $95 million of certificates of obligation.

EDITORIAL BOARD: Road, drainage fixes needed — but parks can wait.

The issues these projects address include residents’ safety during times of flooding and congestion; pedestrian and cyclist safety; sports parks badly in need of maintenance and upgrades; loss of open space to development; and well-considered plans for future parks needed to serve a growing population.

In arriving at this conservative set of projects for such a fast-growing county, we were driven largely by a consensus to mitigate the tax burden to citizens. Important in that respect was the fact that Travis County has largely held the per capita tax burden constant for years and is projected to do so well into the future. To be clear, the rising taxes the editorial board cited are not a consequence of the Travis County portion of your tax bill; Travis County taxes have fluctuated in a narrow band between $574 and $612 per person, per year, since 2013. In fact, 2017 produced the lowest tax bill in that period.

Importantly, our recommendations were also guided by residents’ input received at each of our weekly meetings, as well as six well-attended public forums held across the county.

I also chaired our Parks and Open Space Subcommittee, so me and the committee members dug deeply into the proposed parks and benefits they offer Travis County residents. Based on our own experiences and testimony from experts and residents, what we learned is that our parks are beloved and heavily used. Sports fields are needed where none exist — and those that do exist need of improvements from years of consistent use. Potential parkland along key waterways is under threat from development. Waiting to acquire that parkland will only render it prohibitively expensive in the future — or worse yet, lost forever to development.

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: Viewpoints delivers the latest perspectives on current events.

At one public meeting, we listened to dozens of young children plead with us to recommend funding for a new sports complex. I was personally moved not only by the passion of this future generation of Travis County voters but also by their strong commitment to the democratic process.

While listening to them speak, I reflected on my forebears’ decisions to set aside parkland and my own pending decisions as a committee member and voter. With respect to the decisions of those that preceded me, I realized how grateful I am they invested in parks like Reimers Ranch, Hippie Hollow, Hamilton Pool, Richard Moya Park and all the other places that account for so many of the reasons I love living here.

With respect to our own decisions, I’m certain the generation that follows us will be equally grateful if we choose to grant them the same great places to grow up. To do so, we need only set aside on average $24 per year and vote “yes” for Proposition B.

Langmore is a former transportation consultant in Austin.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: June 25, 2018
Letters to the editor: June 25, 2018

The Austin City Council voting on CodeNext dishonors the act of voting, the 2012 council vote for Imagine Austin and the individuals who sacrificed for voting rights and our form of government — veterans, first responders and citizens. It’s time to stop the process, otherwise the city’s goals set forth in Imagine Austin will go unfulfilled...
Opinion: Return of the blood libel

The speed of America’s moral descent under Donald Trump is breathtaking. In a matter of months we’ve gone from a nation that stood for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to a nation that tears children from their parents and puts them in cages. What’s almost equally remarkable about this plunge into barbarism is that it&rsquo...
Opinion: On being decent

Not too long ago, I returned to my parked car and found a sheet of paper on the windshield bearing an expletive-laden message. The anonymous poster had obviously gone to some effort to make these flyers on his home computer — complete with color cartoon figures and such. It let me know what an (obscenity) I was. My sin was having parked my car...
Herman: Beto O’Rourke flashes star power at Texas Democratic Convention
Herman: Beto O’Rourke flashes star power at Texas Democratic Convention

Some takeaways taken away from three days with 7,500 or so delegates at the Texas Democratic Convention: In general, the Dems didn’t approve a platform with nearly the volume of nutty stuff the Repubs did at their convention. Oh, there’s plenty in the Dem platform that some folks won’t like, but there’s nothing approaching the...
Facebook comments: June 24, 2018
Facebook comments: June 24, 2018

As reported by the American-Statesman’s Johnathan Silver, Austin-based nonprofit Southwest Key Programs spoke out against family separations at the border after President Donald Trump signed an executive order ending the practice. The organization posted a statement on Facebook that said, “Southwest Key Programs does not support separating...
More Stories