Commentary: Whether Syrian strike deters violence depends on Russia

The United States launching several dozen cruise missiles at a Syrian airbase is a significant about-face for President Donald Trump after years of warning against the wisdom of intervening against Bashar Assad’s government and praising Russia for supporting it. In the wake of the missile strike, there has also been more confident talk in Washington against the Syrian president and calls for intervening to topple the Syrian government. But two things should give us pause in expecting too much too quickly: Syria’s Russian patron and the nature of civil war.

To the extent that Assad wants to avoid future punitive strikes, this limited action might make him and his generals hesitate in using chemical weapons in the future. But this depends on a belief that this strike isn’t just a one-off. The Syrian government won’t be deterred from similar atrocities in the future if it believes that American attention will wander — or if it expects additional support from its Russian backer.

It has been reported that Russian forces were notified about the strike ahead of time — and they declined to stop it, though one has to wonder if Russia knew the strike was coming, it would be surprising if Syria didn’t know as well. There’s no guarantee that Russia won’t make such strikes harder for the U.S to carry out in the future, whether by interposing its forces between American forces and potential targets, patrolling key parts of Syrian airspace, or causing problems for American forces elsewhere. Russia has proved that it doesn’t want to see Assad toppled. Therefore, whether this strike really does deter future chemical attacks, as Trump seems to hope it will, depends on whether the Russians allow it.

So what happens next? Russia can exercise a veto over the deterrent value of the attack if it remains a one-off — and undermining that veto may require a willingness to risk open conflict with Russia. There seems to be little stomach for that in Washington. If the U.S. effectively joins the war against Assad, it risks turning a rhetorical war into a shooting war with Russia. Russia has a strong hand to play simply by being present; it’s already shut down the back channel that facilitated coordination with American assets, raising the risk of a collision with American forces and putting the onus for avoiding that risk squarely on Washington.

It isn’t to say there is no leverage to be gained over Russia with the threat of further American involvement, but deeper intervention — abandoning the strategy of trying to contain the war and relying on proxies — will force us to confront a final, ominous reality: the grim nature of civil war.

Civil wars tend to last a long time because peace settlements are difficult to reach, especially when at least one side must return to civilian life or share power. Rebels don’t lay down their weapons when they know the government can then renege on any promises made to a now-powerless opposition.

The stakes are so high — control of the government or death at its hands — that civil wars are all-or-nothing affairs. Political solutions, and any limits foreign powers might like to place on the fighting, are generally nonstarters. And when battlefield progress is the difference between life and death for the government, the threat of punitive strikes for using any weapon — whether it’s poison gas, nerve agents or barrel bombs — might ring hollow. It’s difficult to deter someone whose back is against the wall. With civil wars such as the one in Syria, that’s the case for nearly everyone involved.

Scott Wolford is an associate professor of government at the University of Texas.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: March 25, 2018
Letters to the editor: March 25, 2018

Truly we all feel the Austin Police Department did an outstanding job of apprehending the bomber that terrified the city. As many other law enforcement agencies assisted in this process, the Austin police served as the base to create the successful outcome. The mayor and City Council can now come to terms to provide a mutually agreed upon contract...
Herman: Napkin folding, hand kissing and other diplomatic intricacies
Herman: Napkin folding, hand kissing and other diplomatic intricacies

Our president recently tweeted this at us: “Mike Pompeo, Director of the CIA, will become our new Secretary of State. He will do a fantastic job!” Exciting. The guy in charge of getting dirt on other countries will become the guy in charge of getting along with other countries. What could possibly go wrong? The change means Secretary of...
Facebook comments: March 25, 2018

As reported by the American-Statesman’s Sean Collins Walsh, Claire Osborn, Tony Plohetski, Jeremy Schwartz and Mary Huber relatives of Mark A. Conditt issued a statement Wednesday afternoon saying they are shocked and devastated by the revelation that he was behind the string of bombings that have terrorized Austin this month. The statement was...

There’s a conversation in Austin that’s as predictable as starting the day with breakfast tacos and it revolves around the question that’s on a lot of people’s minds: Is our Austin dying? From Pinballz to Luis’ Corner Barber Shop and Yoga Vida to the patio over at LaLa’s, we love talking about what Austin is evolving...
Jonathan Evison’s latest, ‘Lawn Boy,’ brings humor to life’s misfortunes
Jonathan Evison’s latest, ‘Lawn Boy,’ brings humor to life’s misfortunes

An aimless young man decides to get his life together, but life has other plans in Jonathan Evison’s “Lawn Boy.” Mike Muñoz doesn’t quite know what he wants out of life, but he knows he deserves better than what he’s got now: a terrible job cutting lawns, a truck that barely runs, and a tiny house packed with a...
More Stories