Commentary: Use CodeNext to make Austin affordable for millennials


From the first time I started attending information sessions about CodeNext — the rewrite of Austin’s land development code last year — it seemed that every fellow resident of City Council District 7 had a story to tell me. Usually, it went something like, “When I moved to Brentwood in 1976, houses were going for less than $75,000. But my son and his wife just moved to Cedar Park because they can’t afford anything in Austin.”

To Austin newcomers, it probably seems crazy to think that a generation ago, Brentwood was a neighborhood where a young person just out of college could buy their first home. Today, Brentwood’s original single-family homes can sell for upwards of $500,000.

VIEWPOINTS: Push pause button on CodeNext until concerns are addressed.

Many of the baby boomers I spoke to expressed anxiety and frustration at the rising costs of living in Austin. It is ironic, then, that the restrictive land development policies pursued by baby boomer homeowners during the 1980s have denied their children and their generational compatriots a foothold in the very neighborhoods where they grew up.

Then as now, homeowners were concerned about protecting “the character” of their neighborhood — a character defined by their preference for single-family houses even in older central city neighborhoods, where other types of housing like small apartment buildings, duplexes and fourplexes have long provided more affordable housing options.

As Austin’s population increased in the ensuing decades, new housing did not keep up, resulting in expensive bidding wars for the limited number of single-family homes for sale and skyrocketing rents even for older apartments — especially in the urban core.

Already burdened by far more student debt than their parents and far less job security, young Austinites also face home prices and rental rates their parents couldn’t have imagined at their age.

VIEWPOINTS Q&A: What Austin City Council members say about CodeNext.

My generation shares many of the same dreams our parents had at our age; we too want families and homes to raise them in — but our housing priorities are different. Even as we start families, millennials are far more likely to prefer small homes in a central location than more square footage and expansive yards in the suburbs. We are also less attached to car ownership and free parking.

That’s why there’s greater demand for duplexes, row homes and small apartment buildings that could allow my generation more affordable opportunities closer to their jobs and to raise our children in the city. We must update our land development code to once again allow these more affordable homes.

Though change can be scary — and people have an innate desire to preserve the familiar — the status quo isn’t working for anyone. Rising home prices aren’t just pricing out my generation; they are also fueling displacement of long-time East Austin residents and threatening the ability of many middle-class homeowners throughout the city to stay in their homes. Declining school enrollment is just one way the character of many neighborhoods is already changing under our current code.

Austin is growing — and our housing must do the same. But homeowner privileges shouldn’t come at the expense of affordability and inclusion for renters and young people.

COMMENTARY: Why it’s urgent to stabilize central Austin neighborhoods.

I believe that Austin should welcome all who want to live here, but even if you prioritize the people “living here now,” does that not include young people who grew up here? What about those who have already been forced to leave because of home prices and rental rates?

Our existing land-use policies are what’s driving millennials and their young families out of Austin to Buda, Cedar Park, and Leander. Through CodeNext, we can welcome them in Allandale, Brentwood and Bouldin as well.

We can fix this. It just takes political will.

Rinaldi serves on the board of the urbanist organization AURA: An Austin for Everyone.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: June 23, 2018
Letters to the editor: June 23, 2018

Greater Austin’s population will double, whether we like it or not. If we don’t densify the city’s core, we “sprawlify” the countryside: the Blackland Prairie, the Hill Country and the aquifer contributing zone. Take your choice. It is so much cheaper to add population where we already have the infrastructure — streets...
She’s a TV star, but she’s still grappling with her parents’ deportation
She’s a TV star, but she’s still grappling with her parents’ deportation

The stories of migrant children — separated from their parents at the border, detained in makeshift facilities — has stirred something in all of us, but for Diane Guerrero, the feeling has been especially agonizing. When she was 14, Guerrero, the actress best known for her roles in “Orange Is the New Black” and “Jane the...
Grumet: Who’d want part-time MLS stadium jobs? You’d be surprised
Grumet: Who’d want part-time MLS stadium jobs? You’d be surprised

You may have noticed Austin’s economy is pretty awesome. “You’re rock stars in the world of employment,” David Schein, a business school professor at the University of St. Thomas in Houston told me, referring to our 2.8 percent unemployment rate. “Chicago, Columbus, Cleveland, the rest of the center of the country would...
Alberta Phillips: America the beautiful turns ugly under Trump
Alberta Phillips: America the beautiful turns ugly under Trump

So, this is our America. We’re now a country that gives cover and comfort to white supremacists who publicly slur Jews, African-Americans and Latinos. We’re a nation that defends extremes in gun regulation, even as our children and families are gunned down in our classrooms and churches by persons armed with weapons of war. We’re...
Opinion: But her emails? You’re dang right her emails.

When the Justice Department inspector general’s report revealed that former FBI director James B. Comey had used a personal email account to conduct official business, Hillary Clinton claimed vindication. “But my emails,” she tweeted. Yes, Madam Secretary, your emails. In fact, the overlooked bombshell of the report is the inspector...
More Stories