Commentary: Texas has another chance to fix funding for public schools

Educators always try to keep an open mind about new ideas — and we are trying to keep an open mind about the state’s new school finance study. Although previous studies have failed to produce results for Texas’ 5.3 million public school children, we still have hope. But at the outset, we have reasons for concern.

The two main drivers behind this study were Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who during last year’s legislative sessions were more interested in siphoning tax dollars for private school vouchers than providing adequate and equitable state funding for neighborhood public schools.

HOW WE GOT HERE: New panel launching effort to identify Texas school finance fix.

They promoted the creation of the Texas Commission on School Finance during last summer’s special session instead of supporting legislation overwhelmingly approved by the House to appropriate an additional $1.9 billion for public education and take a first step toward improving the school finance system.

The governor and the lieutenant governor weren’t ready to do the right thing for our students and educators then — and it remains to be seen if this new study will be any different. In the time since they were elected in 2014, the state’s share of the Foundation School Program has slipped from 45 percent to a projected 38 percent in 2019, forcing local property taxpayers to foot more of the bill. Meanwhile, per-student funding in Texas is $2,555 a year below the national average.

Patrick also tried to pass a voucher bill for a limited number of special education students. But the House refused, recognizing that Patrick’s proposal, also supported by the governor, would have been a waste of tax money because most private schools aren’t staffed or equipped to give special education students the services they need.

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: Viewpoints delivers the latest perspectives on current events.

The 13-member school finance commission is a mix of legislators, a State Board of Education member and public members, including educators, and is chaired by former Texas Supreme Court Justice Scott Brister. Judging from remarks at its first meeting, the sharp differences over funding between the House and the Senate remain.

House members, including Public Education Chairman Dan Huberty, made it clear they wanted more state funding for public education and changes in law to distribute it more fairly among rich and poor school districts. But Senate Education Chairman Larry Taylor spoke of finding “efficiencies” and getting the “most bang for the buck.”

This kind of political jargon has forced districts to foot more of the bill and, as a result, local taxpayers will pay 62 percent of Texas’ basic public education costs — excluding federal funds — next year, according to the Legislative Budget Board. The only way to relieve that property tax burden is for the Legislature to increase state education funding and pay its fair share for schools, instead of imposing crippling limits on local governments and school boards, as Abbott and Patrick have proposed.

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK: Our Lone Star Politics page brings Texas news to your Facebook feed.

The Texas State Teachers Association hopes the commission’s work doesn’t become a revitalized campaign to promote vouchers, corporate charters and other privatization plans that would undermine the public schools, where the vast majority of Texas children will continue to be educated. We can’t help but be suspicious — and we will continue to fight those efforts.

We challenge the commission and lawmakers to find equitable ways to spend our education dollars and to recognize that more resources are needed when student enrollment is growing by about 80,000 a year. We hope our challenge will be heard — because we work every day to give every child an opportunity to succeed.

Candelaria is president of the Texas State Teachers Association.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: Feb. 26, 2018

Where is your outrage, President Trump? The Mueller investigation uncovered possibly the most concentrated effort at election tampering in our history, yet you seem strangely unfazed. In fact, your overriding emotion appears to be relief that you are personally exonerated. A fair electoral process is the cornerstone of our democracy — and any...
Commentary: How one lawyer proves her faith in criminal rehabilitation
Commentary: How one lawyer proves her faith in criminal rehabilitation

Any criminal justice system has two purposes: The first is to punish those who have broken the law; the second is to bring about rehabilitation in the lawbreaker, so that he or she will turn his back on a life of crime and embrace a law-abiding life in society. The first is accomplished largely within the closed ranks of the legal system, through courts...
Opinion: Is Trump guilty, or does he just look guilty?

When absorbing news about the Mueller investigation, I can’t help thinking of Saddam Hussein. No, I’m not equating our president with the late Iraqi dictator. I’m thinking more about our assumptions regarding Saddam’s guilt. In the run-up to the Iraq War, the whole world was asking whether Saddam had a secret program for weapons...
Opinion: The content of the GOP’s character

Even those who have long since accepted the premise that Donald Trump is corrupt, self-centered and dishonest seem a bit shocked by his tirades over the Presidents Day weekend. Using the Parkland, Florida, massacre as an excuse to attack the FBI for investigating Russian election intervention on his behalf — while lying about his own past denials...
Viewpoints: Listen, America. Our kids have something to say about guns

The national gun debate has a new, youthful face. This time children are the grown-ups driving the discussion, and they have something to say. We should all listen. Who knows whether we will one day look on the students’ activism as a tipping point for seismic change? For now, there’s no denying their movement is extraordinary and is reverberating...
More Stories