Commentary: Texans’ tax dollars pay for health care — outside our state


Turning down a $10 billion investment in Texas in 2017 is high-grade nonsense. Doing it for the last five years is unconscionable.

That is serious money. It is a mistake with long-lasting consequences when you consider what we could have achieved had that money been invested in our state every one of those years, with continued investment for the years ahead. Think of the jobs that would have been created and the businesses that could have expanded. That infusion of dollars would have had a really big impact on the Texas economy. Every dollar spent on jobs and services generates more jobs and more business. People would have been lifted into well-paying jobs. Furthermore, that money was available virtually without cost to Texans.

Our state government says “no” to billions of dollars out of shear political stubbornness. That money is part of the Obama’s health care law. His name is connected to it, which is all the GOP needs as a reason to turn it down. That is indefensible. The expanded Medicaid money offered to Texans comes from federal taxes that we’ve already paid.

POLITICS: Key Texas lawmaker supports Medicaid policy change.

However, Govs. Rick Perry and Greg Abbott — along with Republican legislators — refuse to take our share back. Instead, the money is going to Oklahoma, Arizona, Ohio and other Republican states, where they recognize a good deal when it lands on their desk. Meanwhile, governors from Democratic states laugh all the way to the bank.

So, how do we take care of our working poor who do not have health insurance? GOP office holders raise your property taxes to make up for the $ 10 billion turned away every year. Did anybody ever explain to you a reason for raising taxes to pay for what your county calls “uncompensated care”? Why not use those available big bucks from the federal government? These are your property taxes. You have a right to know what kind of cockamamie reason justifies robbing you when Uncle Sam was — and still is — willing and able to pay.

In one decade, Texas Republicans will have dropped $ 100 billion or more down the drain for purely political reasons. This money would have gone to hospitals and doctors; to nurses and medics; to fund ambulance services and EMS rooms and specialists; employ pharmacists; provide wheelchairs and rehab to those who need it. It would have paid for vaccinations for babies and mammograms for women. It would have helped to keep our rural clinics and hospitals open, so more Texans would have access to health care.

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: Viewpoints delivers the latest perspectives on current events.

It would have made Texas a better place to live. One in four people in America without health care insurance lives in Texas. Texas ranks 41st among the 50 states at providing health care for its residents when evaluated on standard health care measurements that include: people without health insurance, hospital re-admissions, premature deaths for lack of care; breast cancer deaths per 100,000 female population; colorectal cancer deaths per 100,000 population; and infant mortality deaths per 1,000 live births.

Texas’s miserable record on health care makes us a loser when companies consider relocating here. Companies like Amazon expect facilities and services that will enable their highly paid workers to stay healthy.

It’s still possible to get that federal aid money flowing into Texas jobs and economy — but we need a remake of the Texas Legislature — and a governor who puts the well-being of Texans first. That means we need Democrats in control of governance. State Sen. Charles Schwertner, chair of the committee in charge of health care, recently expressed his objection to expanded Medicaid insurance for Texans to the media. It was because recipients, he said, will use it too much.

Reaney is a retired St. John’s University professor who lives in Georgetown.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: May 21, 2018

Breakthrough! Refreshing news: President Trump’s lead lawyer says he wanted to have “the Hillary Clinton treatment” for the president. What a breakthrough for transparency. Clinton was treated to 11-plus hours of testimony to Congress, her files and servers turned over to the FBI, and Republican leaders asked the Justice Department...
Opinion: Trump breaks bread, glasses and party at lunch

POTUS coming to Tuesday lunch. Translated, the president of the United States is joining 50 Republican senators in the Capitol to crash their private Tuesday lunch. Nobody is glad to hear this on the Senate side. We love the constitutional separation of powers. The Senate is the last citadel of democracy, they say. We in the press are free as birds...
Opinion: Just saying yes to drug companies

Last week we learned that Novartis, the Swiss drug company, had paid Michael Cohen — Donald Trump’s personal lawyer — $1.2 million for what ended up being a single meeting. Then, on Friday, Trump announced a “plan” to reduce drug prices. Why the scare quotes? Because the “plan” was mostly free of substance...
Facebook comments: May 20, 2018
Facebook comments: May 20, 2018

In recent commentary the American-Statesman’s Bridget Grumet wrote about the uncertainty that those who receive federal housing aid are facing after Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson unveiled a proposal to raise the rents on millions of households who receive the assistance. “Be grateful for your good fortune if you don&rsquo...
Herman: Gubernatorial win for Valdez or White would be history-making
Herman: Gubernatorial win for Valdez or White would be history-making

Sometime Tuesday night the relatively few ballots will be tallied and we’ll bid a political farewell, possibly for all time, to one of the two contenders for the gubernatorial nomination of the once-great Democratic Party of Texas. The winner will advance to an upmountain (which is even steeper than uphill) battle with GOP Gov. Greg Abbott in...
More Stories