breaking news

Police say Waffle House shooting victim was from Texas, had family in Austin area

Commentary: We must make sacrifices for the health of our democracy

On Veterans Day we honor the men and women who served in our armed forces. Their sacrifices ensured our security and promoted our prosperity. Their sacrifices supported the growth of our democracy.

But yet, sacrifice only works when we serve without guarantee of personal reward. It requires broad participation, across races, classes and regions. It demands some basic faith in our imperfect system of governance and our always-flawed leaders. Sacrifice is about devoting oneself to a higher public cause.

Less than three months after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin Roosevelt advocated national sacrifice as a foundation for hope and a necessary response to fear:

“This generation of Americans has come to realize, with a present and personal realization, that there is something larger and more important than the life of any individual or of any individual group — something for which a man will sacrifice, and gladly sacrifice, not only his pleasures, not only his goods, not only his associations with those he loves, but his life itself. In time of crisis when the future is in the balance, we come to understand, with full recognition and devotion, what this Nation is, and what we owe to it.”

In our current turbulent times just following a stormy election, our society would benefit from less hate and recrimination and more attention to the virtues of sacrifice.

We need not agree on the solutions to our problems if we can agree to commit ourselves to work together in selfless ways. We need not always like one another if we can find shared identity in common struggle. The challenges demanding collective sacrifice are evident today, and a prior generation offers a useful model of citizenship.

At the time of the Pearl Harbor attack, the American economy was still in the midst of the worst recession in the nation’s history. As Roosevelt contended with economic disaster, he had to resist the global trends toward fascist hatred and prepare to fight the strongest militaries in the world on two distant continents. The president knew that meeting these monumental challenges required the full commitment of the American people. Roosevelt spoke directly and honestly, using his radio “fireside chats” to describe the threats, without exaggeration, and call upon Americans for help in collective efforts to produce, prepare, arm and fight.

Roosevelt demanded widespread sacrifices because he had no choice, but also because he understood that collective sacrifice created reservoirs of strength and unity in a country desperately in need of both after a decade of depression. Turning the war against fascism into a war of the people, by the people, and for people improved the citizen body. As Lincoln predicted at Gettysburg, an active and committed population made our nation great, not the reverse.

It worked. More than 6 million men and women voluntarily joined the U.S. armed forces between 1941 and 1945. Americans also stepped forward to contribute to the cost of the war. Eighty-five million people, half the population of the United States, bought war bonds. Private citizens purchased $185.7 billion of those bonds, covering roughly 60 percent of the cost of the war.

Those numbers are staggering, but they do not fully measure the sacrifices of Americans. Parents and children cut back in their homes to “save waste fats for explosives,” reduce meat consumption and lived by the slogan of “grow your own, can your own.” Commuters were told: “When you ride alone you ride with Hitler, join a car sharing club today!” And they did in large numbers.

Farmers donated scrap material in order to “sink a sub from your farm.” Women joined the workforce in record numbers to replace men who were deployed abroad. And Americans learned that spies could be lurking anywhere, so “loose lips might sink ships.”

The effort to win the war and build a better world involved nearly every citizen. Under Roosevelt’s leadership, Americans curtailed their personal desires, risked their lives and invested directly in the war effort. Americans stepped forward to sacrifice.

We face many of the same challenges today, including gathering threats abroad and a loss of faith in our democracy at home. We cannot renew our national strength without a return to public sacrifice by all citizens — including those with the highest incomes and the best connections.

Instead of arguing over personalities and wedge issues, we need leaders who will motivate citizens for sacrifice toward common goals. We will only come together again when we sacrifice together again. That is the fundamental lesson our veterans have taught us. It is a lesson a new generation will embrace, if the bickering politicians will finally step aside and let a new set of citizen-soldiers take the field.

Suri holds the Mack Brown Distinguished Chair for Leadership in Global Affairs, and Eaker is a graduate student in history at the University of Texas.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: April 24, 2018
Letters to the editor: April 24, 2018

Re: April 22 commentary, “Castillo: Why the ‘hyphenated Americanism’ comment triggered outrage.” The creator of the saying “the law is what the judges say it is” might also have agreed that it is what five judges say it is — until five judges change their minds. So it is with history. The struggle to integrate...
Opinion: Remembering Barbara Bush, grieving mother

My mother and Barbara Bush were contemporaries. Despite coming from very different backgrounds — daughter of a Kansas farmer and daughter of a New York City businessman — they had a common experience, a very human link. It’s a sad connection that I suspect also has many a woman feeling fondly toward Bush, who died Tuesday at 92. Both...
Opinion: Paul Ryan is the ultimate party man

The mistake about Paul Ryan, the one that both friends and foes made over the years between his Obama-era ascent and his just-announced departure from the House speakership, was to imagine him as a potential protagonist for our politics, a lead actor in the drama of conservatism, a visionary or a villain poised to put his stamp upon the era. This Ryan-of-the-imagination...
TWO VIEWS: Austin policies are making affordability crisis worse

Paying more for housing? Blame City Hall. In spite of paying regular lip service to affordability, city officials continue to push big government policies that make it more expensive to live in Austin. In fact, officials are exploring a new one now. Earlier this month, Austin’s Code Department began seeking public input on a proposal requiring...
TWO VIEWS: “No more cane on the Brazos” or affordable housing in Austin
TWO VIEWS: “No more cane on the Brazos” or affordable housing in Austin

How hard is it to find affordable housing these days? Let’s start in Sugar Land, where the old bones of more than 30 newly disinterred, turn-of-the-20th-century prison inmates can no longer afford their final resting places. The bodies have to move to make way for the local school district’s “new career center.” Figures. The...
More Stories