Commentary: MLS stadium deal should score points for the community

Over the past three weeks, since the city was first presented the proposed terms for a stadium deal, there has been a lot of buzz about whether Austin would score a professional soccer team.

As Austinites, each of us understands the real cultural benefits that having a local team could bring, such as enhancing Austin’s sense of identity and hometown pride. We also understand Austin’s connection to soccer: During the first six days of the World Cup’s TV broadcast, Austin ranked second in U.S. viewership.

As elected officials, it is also our job to ensure that we get the best deal for taxpayers, especially when we are considering what is potentially one of the largest incentive packages in the city’s history. The deal we may be voting on in August — to build an MLS stadium at McKalla Place in District 7 — could last for the rest of our lives and impact the city’s revenues for the next 80 years. It is critical that we join this conversation with our eyes open.

Update: Precourt spokesman says McKalla site resolution threatens MLS move to Austin.

Assuming the council on Thursday directs city staff to negotiate with Precourt Sports Ventures on a stadium deal, we will not know the terms of Precourt’s final proposal until city staff present them to the council in August. What we do know is which provisions we would want to see — and what information we would need — to make an informed decision.

That is why we have put together a list of principles that will guide our consideration of any deal negotiated between the city and Precourt. Our principles speak to our belief that public funding for a private stadium should be limited and accompanied by robust and real community benefits – and that it is in the council’s best interest to have complete information when we decide.

In short, we would want a mutually beneficial deal through which Precourt would lay roots in Austin as a contributing member of our community. We believe:

Editorial: Negotiate MLS stadium deal on Austin’s terms, not Precourt’s.

• It is in the best interests of both the city and Precourt for the firm to invest in our community and avoid asking taxpayers to shoulder substantial costs. A significant investment demonstrates that Precourt is committed to Austin’s future. We ask that the city negotiate a deal that minimizes any city subsidies, whether via direct spending or lost potential revenue.

• It is important for the council to have a full and complete understanding of and estimates for all city subsidies and commitments, both through direct spending and lost potential revenue.

• The council is in the best negotiating and decision-making position when we have all our options in front of us. We would also like to see information on other proposals and any opportunity cost analyses presented to the council concurrent with a proposed stadium deal.

Commentary: You can’t put a price on the kinship MLS fans enjoy.

• The terms of a complete proposed deal should be well-defined and not provide for open-ended commitments.

• It is vital for the city to enforce the terms of a deal in a way that ensures that all parties are abiding by the agreement. Enforcement should include strong penalties for relocation discussions intended to extract further city commitments.

• If the city proposes to continue to own the McKalla Place property to exempt Precourt from property taxes, then there should be strong provisions maintaining city control and maximizing commensurate community benefits. Any provisions relinquishing city control over the site — including the ability to program public parkland or use of the public stadium space on nonevent days — should be well-defined.

Related: Why a private soccer stadium is not a good deal for Austin.

A potential stadium deal needs to account for the environmental sensitivity of the area and the mobility impact on the surrounding community. A deal should indicate who is responsible for ensuring the project is designed and implemented in a way that meets the city’s standards for mitigating environmental and mobility impacts – and indicate who is responsible for funding any identified mitigation. City staff should also include Capital Metro in the negotiation.

These principles are reasonable — and our hope is this is an approach the city would take with any other large deal. We are releasing these principles as an invitation for Precourt to put its best foot forward and join the Austin community.

In their initial proposal, Precourt wrote that “Austin does not need soccer, but we hope the city wants soccer.” We believe that our community is invested in soccer. We hope that soccer wants to invest in our community.

Pool, Alter, Houston and Troxclair are Austin City Council members representing Districts 7, 10, 1 and 8, respectively.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Dr. Art Markman and Dr. Bob Duke will talk about your head at Austin Book Arts Center fundraiser
Dr. Art Markman and Dr. Bob Duke will talk about your head at Austin Book Arts Center fundraiser

  Austin Book Arts Center, which lets you, the reader and lover of books, engage in the art of bookmaking, has announced its third annual fall fundraiser. The shindig will feature KOOP’s Greg Ciotti as master of ceremonies,  Dr. Art Markman and Dr. Bob Duke of KUT’s Two Guys on Your Head fame will discuss your brain on books...
Facebook comments: Aug. 21, 2018
Facebook comments: Aug. 21, 2018

As reported by the American-Statesman’s Shonda Novak, the French retailer Chanel is planning to build a manufacturing facility in Austin, according to county deed records and documents filed with the city. Deed records show the company purchased 50 acres east of Austin-Bergstrom International Airport through a real estate holding company it controls...
Letters to the editor: Aug. 21, 2018

I purchased a new 2018 Tesla all-electric vehicle this year. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s Texas Emissions Reduction Plan program offers $2,500 rebates on new electric vehicles. The rebate’s mission is to encourage residents to buy clean energy vehicles ( Teslas are not eligible for this...
Opinion: Kansas governor’s race might be a test for Trumpism

Recent days have me wondering what Kansas’ fifth governor — James Madison Harvey — would say about the pickle the state find itself in now. Harvey, a Republican, is my relative by marriage. He married Charlotte Cutter, whose sister is my great grandmother. To the inevitable reader who will doubt that someone with the last name of...
Opinion: The White Strategy

In the aftermath of the 2012 election, when just about everyone assumed Mitt Romney lost because he didn’t win enough Hispanic votes, election analyst Sean Trende produced a dissenting take. A close look at the results across the Midwest and Appalachia revealed a large population of what Trende called “missing white voters” &mdash...
More Stories