Commentary: Boeing ruling stretched to keep government records secret

Every week, government officials across Texas and private companies receiving taxpayer dollars get increasingly creative in hiding public records.

Their new tool is the Boeing ruling, a decision from the Texas Supreme Court that lowered the threshold for arguing competitive bidding as an exemption from disclosure under the Texas Public Information Act.

It gives governments an easier path to claim that competitive bidding concerns should allow them to keep records secret. Businesses can now make the claim, too.

CITY COUNCIL: Reversing on secrecy, Austin announces six city manager finalists.

Those attempting to censor records under Boeing have sought approximately 1,500 rulings from the Attorney General’s Office since the 2015 court decision — and the number keeps growing. The court decision originated over releasing information in a property lease between Boeing and the Port of San Antonio.

Because the court ruled that the withholding test is now whether knowing a competitor’s bid information creates “an advantage” rather than a “decisive advantage,” requests for sealing government records are frequently granted, even after a final contract has been awarded.

“Wait,” you might say. “Shouldn’t taxpayers have a right to see how their money is spent? This is basic in our democracy.”

You would be correct. But in Texas, you could be out of luck.

Everything from school bus finances to power plant construction costs to a university’s beer marketing agreement have been kept off-limits because of the Boeing ruling.

By the way, no one is suggesting that companies give up their trade secrets. That exemption to disclosure is a separate part of the public information law. The essentials of a company’s contract with government aren’t a trade secret.

Meanwhile, public officials are becoming contortion artists in their use of Boeing to close off all sorts of other information.

VIEWPOINTS: Austin should release names of city manager candidates.

The city of Austin recently used the ruling in an effort to keep secret the names of finalists in its city manager search, saying it didn’t want to give competing cities a hiring advantage. After public pressure and a lawsuit by the Austin American-Statesman, the city said it would release the finalists’ names. It did that on Nov. 20.

In the Rio Grande Valley, the Agua Special Utility District attempted to use the Boeing ruling as a reason to keep secret nearly $500,000 in severance payments it made to two former employees.

The continuing poster child case for the Boeing problem is the city of McAllen’s refusal to say how much taxpayer money it paid to entertainer Enrique Iglesias to perform in a holiday festival.

Clearly, there’s deep erosion occurring in the Texas Public Information Act.

Texas needs to re-examine its commitment to the people’s right to know.

One way to jump-start this important work is with a joint interim committee to study open government laws, called for in Senate Concurrent Resolution 56 that the Texas Senate and House passed and that Gov. Greg Abbott signed.

So far, neither Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick nor Speaker Joe Straus has appointed members to this interim committee. But if they are serious about public access to government information – about the taxpayer’s ability to hold its government accountable – they should do it right away.

Public hearings throughout the state in 2018 would ensure all Texans are included in this vital discussion. We need state leaders to listen to the message that comes through loud and clear every day in communities across Texas: People care about what their government is doing — and they want information.

VOTE TRACKER: The Statesman is logging the Austin City Council’s votes on high-interest issues.

The Sharpstown stock fraud scandal in state government in the early 1970s created a climate for passage of the Open Records Act, which eventually became known as the Public Information Act. The law stood strong for four decades, as Texas government operated mostly in the sunshine.

Texas must not sit around in the dark today waiting for another massive scandal before repairing the law. It’s time to get to work.

Shannon is executive director of the Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Our gold-leaf presidency

Let’s talk for a minute about Mar-a-Lago. Donald Trump was there this week, hosting a get-together with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan. Important stuff to be discussed — North Korea, trade. The two men held a brief press conference on Tuesday, at which the president revealed: “Many of the world’s great leaders request to...
Opinion: Trump’s Syria strike was meant to project strength

WASHINGTON — In 2013, after Syrian dictator Bashar Assad crossed President Obama’s red line and used chemical weapons on innocent civilians, a U.S. official told the Los Angeles Times that Obama’s retaliatory strike would likely be “just muscular enough not to get mocked” but not so devastating that it would elicit a response...
Letters to the editor: April 20, 2018

Re: April 18 article, “Fans turn on political Pop.” Don’t let the screen door bang on the way out if you turn your back on your team because of politics. Team owners won’t tell you what this fan will: Good riddance to fair-weather fans. Maybe you leaving will free up a better seat for me. Reality is we are a country politically...
Facebook comments: April 20, 2018
Facebook comments: April 20, 2018

As reported by the American-Statesman’s Jonathan Tilove, Alex Jones and InfoWars have been sued by the parents of children killed in the 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Conn. The lawsuit centers on Jones suggesting the death of their children was a “hoax.” Tilove wrote the case “could be a landmark Austin...
VIEWPOINTS: Ethics panel would benefit Austin, but don’t rush it
VIEWPOINTS: Ethics panel would benefit Austin, but don’t rush it

It’s still a work in progress, but the Charter Review Commission’s proposal to establish an independent ethics panel to investigate – and if necessary prosecute — alleged violations of Austin’s campaign-finance rules and other ethics-related matters is headed in the right direction. We do offer some cautions: Whatever...
More Stories