Commentary: Bills would allow nurses to fill doctor shortages


In the shadow of Congress failing to improve health care, Texas lawmakers have a golden opportunity to sharply increase access to care: They could substantially increase the number of primary-care providers — and it wouldn’t cost a dime.

We’ve got a real problem here. According to a report by the Commonwealth Fund, a private foundation, in 2015 Texas ranked dead last regarding access to and affordability of health care. The cause: a shortage of providers. Thirty-five counties have no physician — and of Texas’ 254 counties, 220 are considered medically underserved, according to federal data. That leaves 20 percent of Texans — 4.6 million people — without access to a primary-care provider.

Bills introduced this session by state Sen. Kelly Hancock (R-North Richland Hills) and state Rep. Stephanie Klick (R-Fort Worth) could very well pull us out of the ditch. Senate Bill 681 and House Bill 1415 would deploy thousands more advanced practice registered nurses by removing the physician-supervision requirement.

First, some context: Advanced practice registered nurses have been around since the 1960s, which include nurse practitioners, who provide primary care; certified registered nurse anesthetists; certified nurse midwives; and clinical nurse specialists. In the 20th century, when doctors were usually men and nurses usually women, doctors staked out ownership of providing primary care — and legislatures inexplicably enabled them.

But nurse practitioners are exquisitely educated, trained and prepared to provide primary care. Dozens of studies throughout the decades demonstrate nurse practitioners provide primary care on par with physicians, having as good or better patient outcomes. They also score higher in communication.

While almost all states have evolved past physicians’ irrational oppression of nurses, Texas remains among a handful of states that restrict their practice.

As part of a legislative compromise for independent practice in 2013, advanced practice nurses were required to obtain a doctor to sign a document agreeing to supervise their work. Under these agreements, physicians don’t see nurses’ patients, can audit 10 percent of their charts and don’t even have to live in the same city. The contract agreements are extremely costly — from $20,000 to more than $100,000 a year, according to a Dallas Morning News article — and effectively price the practitioners out of Texas.

Four years out from the pay-to-play requirement, we see advanced practice nurses — who are educated in Texas at taxpayer expense and want to stay in Texas — flocking to 21 other states that don’t restrict practice, including all that border Texas. Heck, the New Mexico Legislature recently appropriated money for an advertising campaign to recruit them!

SB 681 and HB 1415 would end the brain drain. We’ve got around 15,500 nurse practitioners practicing here — but we could have thousands more. The bills would also end the Texas Board of Medicine having any regulatory authority over nurses.

The notion of physicians supervising and regulating advanced practice nurses in any way is — in a word — outrageous. Advanced practice nurses are educated and trained by nurses, regulated by nursing, licensed by nursing and governed by nursing. Nursing and medicine are separate professions — and no other health profession is partially regulated by medicine.

Who opposes the bills? Despite the appearance of conflict of interest, the Texas Medical Association cites patient safety as the concern — though not a scintilla of evidence exists from states where nurses practice independently that shows patients are at risk. This is the same organization that produced a workforce report saying that by the year 2025, Texas would be short 10,000 doctors. You’d think they would want the help.

A broad coalition of 20 organizations has formed to support the legislation including AARP, the Texas Association of Business and think tanks that normally oppose each other — the Center for Public Policy Priorities and the Texas Public Policy Foundation.

If every single nurse practitioner and family doctor were deployed, Texas still could not meet the need for primary care; the growing demand far outstrips the supply. If SB 681 and HB 1415 become law, Texas could keep the advanced practice nurses it educates and could recruit advanced practice nurses from other states.

Inglis, a lifelong Austin resident, is a retired neonatal nurse and editor. You may reach her on her website, inglisopinion.com.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Trump calls off Cold War II

Beginning his joint press conference with Vladimir Putin, President Trump declared that U.S. relations with Russia have “never been worse.” He then added pointedly, that just changed “about four hours ago.” It certainly did. With his remarks in Helsinki and at the NATO summit in Brussels, Trump has signaled a historic shift...
Opinion: Two cheers for democratic socialists

WASHINGTON — “Socialism has known increments of success, basic failure and massive betrayal. Yet it is more relevant to the humane construction of the twenty-first century than any other idea.” With those words, the late Michael Harrington began his book “Socialism,” published in 1972. In his day, Harrington was often...
Young: It’s so much like Watergate, and so much worse
Young: It’s so much like Watergate, and so much worse

“During the past year the wildest accusations have been given banner headlines and ready credence as well.” — Richard Nixon, 1974. “The Fake News is working overtime.” — Donald Trump, 2018. Mr. President, we now have indictments that would link the Russian government — not the fat person you imagined on a bed...
Editorial: Mr. President, you failed to stand up for America
Editorial: Mr. President, you failed to stand up for America

No, it wasn’t a slip of the tongue. The problem wasn’t that President Donald Trump said “would” instead of “wouldn’t” during his Monday news conference alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin, as he weighed the U.S. intelligence agencies’ evidence of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election...
ANALYSIS: Can we impeach Trump? 5 things to know about the process
ANALYSIS: Can we impeach Trump? 5 things to know about the process

Removing a president from office is a two-step process. The first step is impeachment. That’s when members of the House indict, or charge, an official with an impeachable offense. Impeachment does not remove the president from office. That only happens if a second step is taken and the president is convicted of the alleged crimes. Jacob Neiheisel...
More Stories