A border wall riddled with holes in logic


Oh, where to begin with President Trump’s ballyhooed vision of a towering, impregnable and “beautiful” wall along the nearly 2,000-mile border with Mexico? Rarely has a project promised so much when clear-eyed thinking should tell us that if built, the wall is likely doomed to epic failure.

We all know the phrase, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” But while there is plenty that is broken with America’s immigration system, Trump’s border wall won’t fix it. Why?

First, because a border wall would do nothing to address the reality that the large majority of people now become undocumented by entering the country legally. Yes, you read that correctly. Fully two-thirds of immigrants who joined the undocumented population in 2014 did not sneak across the border. Instead, they entered the country legally with a valid visa but did not return home when the visa expired, according to data from the Center for Migration Studies.

No border wall — not 10 miles long, not 2,000 miles, no matter how high and mighty — will stop people from entering the country legally.

A border wall ignores the lessons of history, too — one that teaches us a barrier won’t stop people from entering the country illegally, particularly when there are jobs for them here.

We are reminded of this again with the 654-mile border fence already in place, sections of it here in Texas. That fence was breached more than 9,000 times — with ladders, air cannons, even cranes — between 2010 and 2015, according to a Government Accountability Office report.

Though the report does not conclude that fencing is ineffectual, it states that U.S. Customs and Border Protection has not found a way to measure the barrier’s effectiveness in slowing illegal immigration. We must ask: Shouldn’t we have this information before committing to build a massive wall at a cost the Department of Homeland Security estimates at $21.6 billion?

The Migration Studies report poses more questions, such as given the availability of other enforcement tools at the federal government’s disposal — including video surveillance, drones, ground sensors, radar and Border Patrol boots on the ground — is a wall necessary? We support the use of those tools where they can be effective. So do some residents of deep South Texas who live in the shadow of the border wall already built there, as American-Statesman reporter Jeremy Schwartz found in his recent reporting on life along the wall.

Trump’s vow to build a “big, beautiful wall” exploited Americans’ visceral frustration with illegal immigration. It became a cornerstone of his campaign, cheered wildly by throngs of supporters who chanted, “Build that wall.” Mexico will pay for it, Trump told them — an assertion that seemed as ridiculous then as it does now.

Trump depicted a border overrun by marauding Mexican criminals coming here in numbers bigger than ever. It is a chilling narrative at odds with reality. For example:

• More non-Mexicans than Mexicans were apprehended at the U.S. border in 2016, and illegal immigration from Asia is growing at a rate faster than that from Mexico and Latin America.

• Illegal entries to the U.S. have plummeted to about one-tenth the level in 2005, according to Homeland Security data, and Border Patrol arrests are down to one-fourth the level of historic highs.

• The number of undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. has declined since 2007, by about 1 million people, according to figures from the Pew Research Center.

• So has the number of Mexican immigrants crossing the border illegally.

An estimated 11.1 million people live in the U.S. illegally. As we have said often, our nation has an obligation to protect its borders and enforce its immigration laws. But the true test is in how we accomplish this. Do we, for example, place equal emphasis on the economic forces that pull immigrants here and provide them jobs? That’s the elephant in the room whenever Americans gripe about illegal immigration.

Nowhere will the wall’s impact be felt more than here in Texas. As surveying and planning work for a wall has begun, the Trump administration is approaching Texas landowners along the border wall’s proposed path with offers for their land — properties that have been in some families for generations. If an owner declines an offer, the government can seize the land through eminent domain. In that and other ways, a border wall can cause as much harm to Americans as it does to the people the government wants to keep out.

As our recent series on the border chronicled, the fences and walls already in place can disrupt Texans’ way of life. In the Rio Grande Valley, for example, the fence cuts off sizable pieces of Texas from the people who live there, some with roots tracing back more than 100 years. Homeowners and landowners, farms, nature trails and wildlife sanctuaries are caught in a No Man’s Land hemmed in by the fence. And in West Texas, a border wall threatens to blemish a jewel — the grandeur of a rugged and awe-inspiring landscape like no other. Recently, administration and elected officials have backpedaled off Trump’s vision of a wall in West Texas, perhaps realizing it would be useless there.

As the border wall moves forward, we urge the administration to maintain the beauty of our parks and public spaces. We recommend, too, that it give urgent and equal attention to shifting sources of illegal immigration and that it address the vexing problem of visa overstays.

Until it finds a way to record when visitors from other countries leave, solutions like a border wall seem out of touch with reality. In describing his vision of a “big, beautiful wall,” President Trump likens it — in jest or not — to a monument to great architecture. Unless the administration can square what it wants to accomplish in responding to illegal immigration with what a border wall can realistically deliver, Trump’s wall could be instead a sad and expensive monument to futility.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: America’s unsustainable empire

Before President Trump trashes the Iran nuclear deal, he might consider: If he could negotiate an identical deal with Kim Jong Un, it would astonish the world and win him the Nobel Peace Prize. For Iran has no nuclear bomb or ICBM and has never tested either. It has cameras inside and inspectors crawling all over its nuclear facilities. And North Korea?...
Opinion: Macron on Trumpism — Non!

WASHINGTON — The early story line about President Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron focused on their “bromance” and Trump’s puerile claim to dominance when he brushed what he said was dandruff off Macron’s suit. But on the last day of his state visit on Wednesday, Macron showed he will not be trifled with. He...
Was Jeff Davis Avenue named after a different Jefferson Davis?
Was Jeff Davis Avenue named after a different Jefferson Davis?

Pop quiz: Jeff Davis was ________________________. (a) A populist governor and U.S. Senator from Arkansas in the early 1900s. (b) A comedian on the TV show “Whose line is it anyway?” (c) The first and only president of the Confederacy. (d) An artist who creates mementos out of old vinyl records. OK, technically all four of those men were...
Letters to the editor: April 26, 2018
Letters to the editor: April 26, 2018

Re: April 23 letter to the editor, “Mafia? Comey flatters Trump.” I’ve stood blithely by while insults are hurled back and forth between opposing political and social factions without ever saying or writing a word of protest. But now one of your readers has gone too far. As co-captain of the Hooligan golf group in Georgetown, I must...
Commentary: Help pre-K kids manage feelings instead of suspending them
Commentary: Help pre-K kids manage feelings instead of suspending them

What about the four-year-old who tears posters off the classroom wall? Or the pre-K student who threw his shoes? Those are two of the responses we’ve received to our report about the 101,000 times Texas school districts suspended students in pre-K through second grade in a single year. We can imagine how frustrating and disruptive it was for...
More Stories