CodeNext foes are done with compromise. They’re going for the kill.


Talk of compromise is gone in neighborhood preservationists’ fight against CodeNext.

CodeNext could become a major political issue in the November election.

Critics see latest draft as a stealthy way to encourage neighborhood density, despite city reversing course.

Jeff Jack was angry.

It was a recent Wednesday night at Austin Energy’s Barton Springs Road headquarters, and the Austin Neighborhoods Council’s latest meeting on CodeNext was coming to an end.

“The train is running full blast, and there is only one way to stop it,” Jack told the group of about 50. That runaway train, in his view, is CodeNext, the massive rewrite of the city’s rules about what kind of development can go where. And the air brakes, critics hope, is their petition drive to give voters the power to reject CodeNext.

Jack and groups closely affiliated with the Austin Neighborhoods Council, such as Community Not Commodity, have won some major concessions as CodeNext has evolved in the past year. Most recently, in the third draft of CodeNext released last month, staffers removed a broad upzoning of Central City neighborhoods that had been in the second draft, focusing on milder changes to promote more housing units and other growth along major road corridors.

Still, the opposition to CodeNext has grown from compromise to scorched earth.

Derailing the $8.5 million project has emerged as the only acceptable outcome for many critics of the land use code rewrite, which was undertaken as a broad effort to increase housing density in hopes of reducing housing prices, among many other lofty goals.

Opponents are now focused on gathering enough petition signatures to force a November referendum on whether voters should get to approve major zoning plan changes. If voters approve that measure, CodeNext itself would go on the ballot sometime next year.

BACKSTORY: How a petition drive aims to put CodeNext’s fate in voters’ hands

As Jack rallied the group to gather more signatures, talk turned to more drastic measures.

“We all have to flood City Hall,” Daniel Llanes, a performance artist and East Austin activist, said at the same meeting. “It may come down to a moment where we have to resort to civil disobedience.”

Error in code riles critics

The critics’ intensity against CodeNext is fueled, in no small part, by a distrust of City Hall.

When the third draft of CodeNext was released Feb. 12, the latest version appeared to be a victory for neighborhood preservationists. Gone were the provisions from the second draft that would have allowed for three housing units per lot in many Central Austin neighborhoods. Instead, CodeNext 3.0 gave neighborhoods like Bouldin Creek, Travis Heights and Brentwood the closest approximation of the zoning they currently have.

But within hours of the draft’s release to the public, many neighborhood activists pounced on a section they interpreted as a stealthy way to drastically increase density in those neighborhoods.

That classification, known as R2C, limits the capacity on a single lot to two housing units, such as a duplex or a house and a garage apartment. The same limit is already applied to most of these neighborhoods’ current zoning classification, SF-3.

ALSO READ: Austin affordability plan shows incentives to build taller, denser

But a part of the latest draft code indicates that lots of 7,000 square feet or more could be split into two smaller lots, one for each side of a duplex or two attached single-family homes. On those two smaller lots, the property owner could then add another housing unit to each side.

So in theory, a developer could demolish a single-family home on a 7,000-square-foot lot, build a duplex and add two garage apartments. The site would go from one dwelling to four.

Planning and Zoning Director Greg Guernsey was peppered with questions about this issue at the recent Austin Neighborhoods Council meeting on CodeNext. He told the crowd it was an error for that measure to have been included in the code. He said it would be deleted.

Days later, Mike Lavigne, a spokesman for the anti-CodeNext group Community Not Commodity, wasn’t buying it.

“It shows that they don’t know what is in their draft, and if it wasn’t for us, this would go unedited,” Lavigne said.

CodeNext spokeswoman Alina Carnahan said the staff will be releasing corrections to errors as the process moves forward. It was unclear how that particular error got added to the draft, but Carnahan said there was no intention behind it.

Even with that correction, neighborhood preservationists remain up in arms over relaxations to rules regarding parking requirements and the construction of accessory dwelling units on lots with houses that are 10 years or older.

Will voters remember CodeNext?

Delays caused by the creation of the third draft have led the staff to abandon the original timeline for City Council approval of CodeNext in April. Now the required recommendation from the Planning Commission is not expected until at least May, sending the code to the council in late May or June.

That timing — and the effort to put a voter referendum on the November ballot affecting CodeNext — could result in the issue looming large as Mayor Steve Adler and five City Council members campaign for re-election this fall.

“That is something that our elected officials are ultimately going to have to decide, whether they want to fall on their sword for this one,” Lavigne said. “If they pass this (CodeNext) in its current state, the electoral consequences will be catastrophic.”

ALSO READ: Anti-CodeNext PACs spend thousands to force vote

Adler’s main challenger so far, former City Council Member Laura Morrison, has already announced that she is against CodeNext unless it benefits “all of Austin,” a virtual impossibility given how subjective that measuring stick is. Morrison was at the Austin Neighborhoods Council meeting and flyers for her campaign had been placed under each seat.

Also in attendance was City Council Member Leslie Pool, who is widely seen as a “no” vote on CodeNext.

Council Member Ora Houston also appears a virtual lock for a “no” vote. Last week, in announcing a March 22 proclamation to remember the racial inequity caused by the city’s 1928 master plan, Houston, the council’s only African-American member, compared CodeNext to the infamous master plan that segregated Austin.

“As proposed, CodeNext will accelerate, amplify and increase the displacement of individuals and the transfer of their residences and land,” Houston said. “The major impact of both plans is the same: Minorities and the less affluent lose their property and homes today and their opportunity to build wealth for tomorrow.”

But even with a successful petition appearing more likely — the effort’s chief organizer, Bastrop resident Linda Curtis, said this week she has more than 24,000 signatures and aims to file the petition March 22 — not everyone sees CodeNext as a political issue that could threaten City Council members’ re-election campaigns.

Mark Littlefield, a lobbyist and local political strategist, said that since the release of the third draft, the fervor surrounding CodeNext from those not highly involved in activist groups has been all but silenced.

“This started as a battle between a couple hundred die-hard neighborhood activists and a couple hundred die-hard urban activists,” Littlefield said. “Then it grew to include hundreds, thousands of new people that cared about it one way or the other. Now it seems like it is back to the original hundred neighborhood preservationists and density advocates.”

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Local

Police reports in Illinois paint disturbing profile of Travis Reinking
Police reports in Illinois paint disturbing profile of Travis Reinking

Travis Reinking, the man police are seeking in connection with the killing of four people at a Waffle House in Antioch, Tennessee, was well-known to police in the Illinois county where he lived, the Journal Star of Peoria reported. Police reports present a disturbing picture of the man who allegedly opened fire at the restaurant.  Tazewell...
3 Southwest flights canceled at Austin airport amid maintenance checks
3 Southwest flights canceled at Austin airport amid maintenance checks

At least three Southwest Airlines flights were canceled Monday morning as the airline continues performing maintenance inspections in the wake of an engine failure last week that resulted in the death of a passenger. As of 8 a.m., an arriving flight and a departing flight to Dallas-Love Field and a departing flight to Phoenix had been canceled, ...
OVERNIGHT: Man injured in crash on I-35 at U.S. 183; fuel spill briefly closes road
OVERNIGHT: Man injured in crash on I-35 at U.S. 183; fuel spill briefly closes road

A man in his 30s was critically injured after a collision with a dump truck caused a fuel spill that briefly closed Interstate 35 in Northeast Austin near the U.S. 183 interchange early Monday. Medics responded just after midnight to the 7600 block of I-35 North where a driver was found unconscious before being taken to Dell Seton Medical Center with...
Onyeri to testify again in his trial linked to Judge Kocurek’s shooting
Onyeri to testify again in his trial linked to Judge Kocurek’s shooting

Chimene Onyeri, who is on trial for fraud and racketeering, will return to federal court Monday to continue his testimony about the 2015 shooting of Travis County District Judge Julie Kocurek. From the witness stand last week, Onyeri confessed to shooting Kocurek outside of her West Austin home, but insisted it was a mistake and that he had not targeted...
FORECAST: Sunshine, high near 84; clear at night, low around 58
FORECAST: Sunshine, high near 84; clear at night, low around 58

Monday forecast for Austin: Happy Monday! The work week will kick off with sunshine and seasonable (for Central Texas) springtime temperatures that could reach 84 degrees. At night, the National Weather Service expects clear skies with temperatures bottoming out around 58. Tuesday should be just as sunny as the day before, but with temperatures...
More Stories