Council to debate fee waiver for vets parade with Confederate groups


If Austin declined to waive fees for city services, parade organizers could face a $21,000 bill in 2018.

Spokesman for Confederate heritage group describes resolution as ‘blackmail from the mayor and council.’

The Austin City Council will vote Thursday on a resolution that aims to prevent Confederate heritage organizations from participating in the coming Veterans Day parade.

Mayor Steve Adler is the lead sponsor of the resolution, which states that fee waivers for Veterans Day events should be reserved for ones that “honor only those who have served in the United States of America’s Armed Forces.”

Those fee waivers likely would amount to at least $20,000 in leverage the City Council could put to bear against the local Veterans of Foreign Wars post that organizes the November parade. For the Veterans Day parade and similar ones, the City Council almost always waives the fees for providing police, emergency medical services, trash collection and other city services.

Last year, waived fees for the veterans parade totaled $21,636, according to the city.

“It is blackmail from the mayor and council if you ask me,” said Terry Ayers, spokesman for Descendants of Confederate Veterans. The descendants group and the Sons of Confederate Veterans are the two Confederate heritage groups that have marched in the parade in recent years, generally dressed in replica uniforms.

“They are saying, ‘We don’t like these two groups. So if you allow these two groups in it, we are going to make you pay for it,’” Ayers added.

Adler’s resolution is co-sponsored by three other council members: Greg Casar, Sabino “Pio” Renteria and Kathie Tovo. It is the latest move by the council to address the historical presence of the Confederacy in Austin.

In recent weeks, the city published a report that identified several streets named for Confederate figures as possible targets for renaming. In April, the city renamed streets that recognized Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis, who was president of the Confederacy.

“I don’t think that the city can have an intent to focus on any viewpoint to which it disagrees,” Adler told the Statesman, “but what the city can do is promote a certain value. In this case, it is honoring those that have served the armed forces of the United States of America and focusing just on those armed forces.”

Manuel Jimenez, an Iraq War veteran and the head of ATXVets, said the presence of Confederate heritage groups in the parade endorses a “symbol of hate.” Jimenez founded ATXVets in the wake of Gov. Greg Abbott’s decision to pull state grant funding from Travis County’s veterans court because the sheriff’s office at the time was refusing to honor federal detention requests placed on jail inmates suspected of breaking immigration laws.

“(The groups’ participation) been controversial for years,” Jimenez said. “It is not something that just popped up.”

In 2015, Adler and Travis County Judge Sarah Eckhardt called for the Confederate battle flag to be pulled from the parade. The county eventually cut ties with the committee that organizes the parade. Eckhardt refused to march in the parade in 2016.

In 2017, the Confederate groups agreed to pull the battle flag, which Ayers and Sons of Confederate Veterans head Marshall Davis said had been co-opted by hate groups. Instead, the marchers waved the national flag of the Confederacy that’s also known as the “stars and bars.” That year, Adler joined Eckhardt in refusing to participate in the parade.

The decision about whether the Confederate heritage groups can participate this November lies with the parade committee for the Austin Veterans Day Parade organization. Members of the committee as well as the head of Oak Hill VFW Post 4443, which is organizing the parade, did not respond to phone calls or emails from the Statesman.

City Council Member Ora Houston, the lone African-American on the council, said Wednesday during a council work session that she was “uncomfortable” with the resolution.

“I think it is exclusionary,” Houston said, directing her comments at Adler. “I think you are trying to say something without saying what you are trying to say because it would probably be against free speech.”

Houston went on to ask whether a future council might be able to prevent people of certain nationalities from applying for fee waivers for special events.

“Everybody should have a right to request (a fee waiver),” Houston said. “The council has a right not to grant it. That process is already in place.”

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Politics

Review of peer cities finds Austin’s legal structure has different look
Review of peer cities finds Austin’s legal structure has different look

Most of Austin’s peer cities have city attorneys who report directly to the City Council as opposed to the city manager, which is how Austin has framed its legal structure. The finding, through a staff review completed last week, has added context to lingering debate about whether Austin should adopt the same setup. Earlier this year, a Charter...
PolitiFact: Cruz didn’t say what viral image alleges
PolitiFact: Cruz didn’t say what viral image alleges

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz has been openly opposed to same-sex marriage, but he didn’t blame gay people for mass shootings and public nudity during a 2014 speech. A 2015 viral image that falsely quotes Cruz is gaining traction again on social media as the Republican incumbent looks to keep his seat against Democratic nominee U.S. Rep. Beto O’Rourke...
Austin gentrification study touted as tool to fix affordability crisis
Austin gentrification study touted as tool to fix affordability crisis

When Delwin Goss moved to the Montopolis neighborhood in Southeast Austin in 1992, it wasn’t safe to walk down the street at night because it had so much crime, he said. Over time, the fabric of the neighborhood has started to change: People jog at night at dusk, and many of the drug houses have closed. But home prices are rapidly increasing...
Echoes of Anita Hill in charge against Brett Kavanaugh
Echoes of Anita Hill in charge against Brett Kavanaugh

In a prologue to their 1994 book, “Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas,” journalists Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson wrote of how “unresolved the conflict” remained between Thomas, the conservative justice, and Anita Hill, the law professor who testified that he had sexually harassed her a decade earlier...
Did backers of city audit proposition skirt ‘dark money’ restrictions?
Did backers of city audit proposition skirt ‘dark money’ restrictions?

The political action committee behind a ballot proposition that calls for an independent efficiency audit of Austin City Hall might have broken local campaign finance laws by shielding the identities of its donors, according to city officials. In the sole campaign finance report it filed with the city, Citizens for an Accountable Austin showed only...
More Stories