Austin will keep city manager search a secret


Highlights

City Council members agreed not to release applicants, even finalists, until they’ve picked a favorite.

In the past Austin, and other peer cities, have allowed the public to weigh in on finalists.

Austin City Council members will not allow the public to know whom they are considering for a new city manager — even the finalists — until a final pick is named.

Under a process the council unanimously approved Thursday, search firm Russell Reynolds Associates will solicit public input early on what criteria it should look for in a successor to Marc Ott, who left the city in October.

The search firm will then recruit applicants and whittle down the list to five or 10 finalists. Council members will pick finalists and hold interviews behind closed doors.

The process is expected to take three to six months. Only when there is a single finalist will his or her name become public, as Russell Reynolds representative Stephen Newton recommended.

“On balance, what is absolutely critical for our city is to obtain the best, most innovative, forward-thinking city manager,” Council Member Ann Kitchen said. “The process for doing that would be best served by the recommendation.”

STAY ON TOP OF THE NEWS: Click here to sign up for our Breaking News emails

City manager is Austin’s most powerful position: This person oversees daily operations of all city departments and fulfills roles often designated to mayors in cities without a manager form of government. Elaine Hart, the city’s chief financial officer, is serving as interim city manager until Ott’s replacement is hired.

It’s common for cities searching for a new city manager to outsource the job to a search firm that keeps confidential information that would otherwise be public.

But it’s less common for cities to keep the entire process a secret. Dallas announced five finalists for its city manager job in November, before bringing them to the city individually to meet with council members and citizens. Fort Worth, likewise, named several finalists when it selected a new city manager in 2014. Other large Texas cities have done the same.

Before Austin hired Ott as city manager in 2008, city leaders released a list of eight semifinalists and held public forums with two finalists. Even then, the council faced criticism for the process being too secretive.

A couple of recent police chief and superintendent searches — including the Houston search that nabbed Police Chief Art Acevedo from Austin — have remained totally confidential. But Newton wasn’t aware of cities that have done the same thing for a manager.

Still, he defended the secrecy recommendation, saying it would draw a wider range of candidates because some people might not want their current employers to know they’re looking elsewhere.

Council members “don’t want us to be narrow in our focus,” he said. “It could be public servants from other types of organizations, be it city, state, county, federal. It could be any number of different backgrounds who have the qualifications.”

RELATED: Should city manager search seek government or corporate types?

Terrell Blodgett, a former University of Texas government professor, said he is concerned Austin isn’t being more open. Dallas and Amarillo both recently allowed public input on manager finalists with no indication it affected the quality of the candidates, he said.

“The council has taken months and years soliciting public input on CodeNext. They take weeks to decide a zoning case,” he told the Statesman. “I don’t know why they wouldn’t take public input on a manager.”

He noted that a city manager is likely to outlast most of the council members doing the hiring.

“It may be a council decision, but it ought to be a community consensus,” Blodgett said. “I wouldn’t call it a consensus if it’s a 21-day gun to the (public’s) head with a single candidate,” he said, referring to the time period between the announcement of the finalist and the official hiring offer.

Other local activists advocated for the secrecy provisions, arguing that the city should be trying to attract high-level business executives rather than career public servants.

“Let’s say you’re a $250,000 executive, and you’re happy where you are,” said Mike Levy, Texas Monthly’s former publisher, who advocates on city issues. “You’re not going to want anyone to know you’re looking.”

He argued public input on finalists adds nothing to the process.

“Ultimately, the council is going to go into executive session and hire who they think is best,” he said.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

Review of peer cities finds Austin’s legal structure has different look
Review of peer cities finds Austin’s legal structure has different look

Most of Austin’s peer cities have city attorneys who report directly to the City Council as opposed to the city manager, which is how Austin has framed its legal structure. The finding, through a staff review completed last week, has added context to lingering debate about whether Austin should adopt the same setup. Earlier this year, a Charter...
PolitiFact: Cruz didn’t say what viral image alleges
PolitiFact: Cruz didn’t say what viral image alleges

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz has been openly opposed to same-sex marriage, but he didn’t blame gay people for mass shootings and public nudity during a 2014 speech. A 2015 viral image that falsely quotes Cruz is gaining traction again on social media as the Republican incumbent looks to keep his seat against Democratic nominee U.S. Rep. Beto O’Rourke...
Austin gentrification study touted as tool to fix affordability crisis
Austin gentrification study touted as tool to fix affordability crisis

When Delwin Goss moved to the Montopolis neighborhood in Southeast Austin in 1992, it wasn’t safe to walk down the street at night because it had so much crime, he said. Over time, the fabric of the neighborhood has started to change: People jog at night at dusk, and many of the drug houses have closed. But home prices are rapidly increasing...
Echoes of Anita Hill in charge against Brett Kavanaugh
Echoes of Anita Hill in charge against Brett Kavanaugh

In a prologue to their 1994 book, “Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas,” journalists Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson wrote of how “unresolved the conflict” remained between Thomas, the conservative justice, and Anita Hill, the law professor who testified that he had sexually harassed her a decade earlier...
Did backers of city audit proposition skirt ‘dark money’ restrictions?
Did backers of city audit proposition skirt ‘dark money’ restrictions?

The political action committee behind a ballot proposition that calls for an independent efficiency audit of Austin City Hall might have broken local campaign finance laws by shielding the identities of its donors, according to city officials. In the sole campaign finance report it filed with the city, Citizens for an Accountable Austin showed only...
More Stories