Austin weighs response to injunction against paid sick leave ordinance


The city of Austin on Thursday filed an appellate briefing as part of the ongoing fight over the city’s controversial paid sick leave mandate.

It was unclear Friday whether the city would appeal a temporary injunction against the ordinance to the Texas Supreme Court.

On Thursday evening, the city’s legal team finalized a briefing in response to an Aug. 24 ruling by the Texas 3rd Court of Appeals that blocked the ordinance. The justices made no assessment of the merits of the law, which would require nearly all Austin employers to provide paid sick days to employees, according to city officials.

In February, the Austin City Council passed the paid sick leave ordinance — the first of its kind in Texas — to the cheers of progressive activists. Its passage was followed almost immediately by vows from state lawmakers to undo the ordinance during the 2019 legislative session.

In the interim, a coalition of businesses and business advocacy groups represented by the conservative Texas Public Policy Foundation took the city to court. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton also joined the legal efforts to try to overturn the ordinance, originally set to go into effect Oct. 1.

The group opposing the ordinance lost in a local state district court in June before the appeals court granted an injunction on Aug. 17.

Opponents’ main legal argument against the ordinance is that it violates the Texas Minimum Wage Act, which prohibits cities from setting a local minimum wage at a rate that’s higher than the federal minimum wage.

Under the ordinance, workers would earn one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked, up to a total of 64 hours, or eight days a year. Small businesses with 15 or fewer employees would have a paid sick leave cap of 48 hours a year.

Opponents believe the ordinance will stunt businesses’ growth by increasing costs to their owners. Supporters have said the law will prevent the spread of illness in the workplace, reduce turnover and save employers money by minimizing lost productivity.

“Paxton and the big business lobby are willing to do anything to prevent someone from taking a sick day or caring for a sick child,” said Council Member Greg Casar, the lead sponsor of the ordinance who helped drive its passage.

Correction: This story has been updated to clarify that the city of Austin filed an appellate brief with the Third Court of Appeals on Thursday.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

Review of peer cities finds Austin’s legal structure has different look
Review of peer cities finds Austin’s legal structure has different look

Most of Austin’s peer cities have city attorneys who report directly to the City Council as opposed to the city manager, which is how Austin has framed its legal structure. The finding, through a staff review completed last week, has added context to lingering debate about whether Austin should adopt the same setup. Earlier this year, a Charter...
PolitiFact: Cruz didn’t say what viral image alleges
PolitiFact: Cruz didn’t say what viral image alleges

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz has been openly opposed to same-sex marriage, but he didn’t blame gay people for mass shootings and public nudity during a 2014 speech. A 2015 viral image that falsely quotes Cruz is gaining traction again on social media as the Republican incumbent looks to keep his seat against Democratic nominee U.S. Rep. Beto O’Rourke...
Austin gentrification study touted as tool to fix affordability crisis
Austin gentrification study touted as tool to fix affordability crisis

When Delwin Goss moved to the Montopolis neighborhood in Southeast Austin in 1992, it wasn’t safe to walk down the street at night because it had so much crime, he said. Over time, the fabric of the neighborhood has started to change: People jog at night at dusk, and many of the drug houses have closed. But home prices are rapidly increasing...
Echoes of Anita Hill in charge against Brett Kavanaugh
Echoes of Anita Hill in charge against Brett Kavanaugh

In a prologue to their 1994 book, “Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas,” journalists Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson wrote of how “unresolved the conflict” remained between Thomas, the conservative justice, and Anita Hill, the law professor who testified that he had sexually harassed her a decade earlier...
Did backers of city audit proposition skirt ‘dark money’ restrictions?
Did backers of city audit proposition skirt ‘dark money’ restrictions?

The political action committee behind a ballot proposition that calls for an independent efficiency audit of Austin City Hall might have broken local campaign finance laws by shielding the identities of its donors, according to city officials. In the sole campaign finance report it filed with the city, Citizens for an Accountable Austin showed only...
More Stories