Austin City Council gets first look at proposed $851 million bond


Highlights

The Austin City Council on Tuesday peeked under the hood of a task force’s recommended $851 million bond.

The bond could go to voters in November.

Some council members might push for the affordable housing portion to be increased.

The Austin City Council on Tuesday got its first look at a proposed $851 million bond that could be brought before voters in November.

With a proposed price tag that is about the same as the Tampa Bay Rays’ current value, the 2018 bond aims to focus on affordable housing, parks, building maintenance, stormwater and transportation infrastructure.

On Election Day, the bond could take shape in as many as five voter referendums on the ballot. Figuring out whether $851 million is the right figure to sell to voters appeared to be Tuesday’s focus as council members took their first public look under the hood of a bond recommendation made by a panel of 13 Austin residents.

“It doesn’t do us any good to go out with a bond package and have it fail,” Council Member Alison Alter said.

A task force of council appointees and two land-use commissioners have been examining the bond for more than a year. On Tuesday, they presented a $851 million bond that goes beyond the $640 million that staffers gave as an initial recommendation.

If voters approve the package, the average Austin homeowner would see about $60 added to his annual property tax bill.

Transportation bonds approved in 2016 totaled $720 million.

Austin city taxes, fees expected to hit $4,032 for average homeowner

Last week, three council members signaled that they wanted to go big on a proposed affordable housing bond by nearly doubling the task force’s recommended $161 million package to $300 million. The bond, which would be part of the package discussed Tuesday, would be by far the largest housing bond ever presented to Austin voters.

In 2012, residents voted down a $78 million affordable housing bond. A year later, they approved a $65 million housing bond.

Both the bond committee and council members have said they believe Austin residents this year have a greater appetite for financing affordable housing projects through issuing debt. In past bond elections, voters have prioritized spending on transportation and parks more than any other area, Council Member Delia Garza said.

“This is an opportunity to change how we invest in affordable housing,” Garza said. “Instead of making it the least, we can make it the most.”

No earnest discussion has begun on how to cut back on other slices of the bond to increase the affordable housing bond from the suggested $161 million. Council Member Kathie Tovo said that she could be persuaded to increase the housing portion if it makes sense to voters.

“I’m interested in talking more about increasing this amount,” she said. “The last time we had affordable housing bonds, I was a part of a couple of council members that advocated for a larger amount.”

Support gathering to boost affordable housing bonds to $300 million

Tom Nuckols, a member of the bond election advisory task force, told the council Tuesday that the task force voted 11-2 to approve the recommendation. The two members who voted against it would agree only to a bond that would not increase taxes.

Some of those who voted in favor, Nuckols said, approved the $851 million figure believing that the council should scale back the total size of the package.

“There was a sentiment that it ought to be pared down in the interest of affordability,” Nuckols said. “The thinking was that the council needed to be the ones to make that decision.”

Tuesday’s discussion remained broad, but the council did address a few individual projects. One was $25 million for the Dougherty Arts Center.

Staffers and the bond task force suggested moving the facility because the center — built in 1947 just east of West Bouldin Creek on Barton Springs Road — is subject to repeated flooding.

The only area floated as a possible new location is Butler Shores Metropolitan Park. That suggestion irked Council Member Ann Kitchen, who alluded to the recent outcry that arose after the owner of the Crew SC Major League Soccer team — who is looking to move the club from Columbus, Ohio, to Austin — chose the park as the No. 1 choice to build a soccer stadium. The proposal was scratched, and other locations are currently being studied for the project.

“We’ve already talked about that,” Kitchen said. “I would not be in favor in using parkland that we want to preserve.”

Looking ahead, task force members and staffers will go before various city commissions over the next few months to talk about the bond. City staff members are due to present updated tax estimates on the bond next month.

The council then will have a little more than two months to come up with what propositions to place on the ballot.

The council must make that final decision by Aug. 9.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Politics

Austin gentrification study touted as tool to fix affordability crisis
Austin gentrification study touted as tool to fix affordability crisis

When Delwin Goss moved to the Montopolis neighborhood in Southeast Austin in 1992, it wasn’t safe to walk down the street at night because it had so much crime, he said. Over time, the fabric of the neighborhood has started to change: People jog at night at dusk, and many of the drug houses have closed. But home prices are rapidly increasing...
Echoes of Anita Hill in charge against Brett Kavanaugh
Echoes of Anita Hill in charge against Brett Kavanaugh

In a prologue to their 1994 book, “Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas,” journalists Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson wrote of how “unresolved the conflict” remained between Thomas, the conservative justice, and Anita Hill, the law professor who testified that he had sexually harassed her a decade earlier...
Did backers of city audit proposition skirt ‘dark money’ restrictions?
Did backers of city audit proposition skirt ‘dark money’ restrictions?

The political action committee behind a ballot proposition that calls for an independent efficiency audit of Austin City Hall might have broken local campaign finance laws by shielding the identities of its donors, according to city officials. In the sole campaign finance report it filed with the city, Citizens for an Accountable Austin showed only...
Judge refuses to dismiss official oppression charge against Dan Gattis
Judge refuses to dismiss official oppression charge against Dan Gattis

A judge ruled Friday that the Williamson County attorney’s office must amend its complaint about an official oppression charge against County Judge Dan Gattis to include more information about the charge against him. Visiting Judge Sid Harle, however, refused to dismiss the charge. The complaint said the county judge...
Average Hutto homeowner could see $81 increase in property taxes
Average Hutto homeowner could see $81 increase in property taxes

The average homeowner in the city of Hutto could pay about $81 more in property taxes this year. The increase reflects rising property values across Williamson County. The Hutto City Council is proposing to adopt the same tax rate as last year — 51.5 cents per $100 valuation — and would need to adopt a lower rate to keep taxes from increasing...
More Stories