What’s the tax impact of $1B in Austin school bonds? Hint: It’s not $0


Climbing property values may allow Austin district to take on $1 billion in debt without raising tax rate.

Critics point out that district’s pledge to keep tax rate flat doesn’t mean tax bills won’t continue to rise.

Property values have grown an average of 8 percent in past decade and an average of 12 percent since 2013.

Austin school leaders say they can take on $1.05 billion in bond debt without raising the district’s tax rate, based largely on climbing property values and the district’s ability to pay down more than half of its existing debt in the next decade.

Keeping the tax rate the same is a central feature of the district’s political campaign for the bond proposition going before local voters in November. The money from the bond measure would pay to construct new schools, rebuild deteriorating campuses and modernize a school system for which the average building is 40 years old.

The district points to its last bond election — $392 million approved by voters in 2013 — as an example of how it can tamp down the impact on property tax bills. Those bonds were expected to raise the tax rate by 3 cents, or about $38.40 a year to the property tax bill for a $200,000 home.

But instead, the district, buoyed by increasing property values, lowered the tax rate by 5 cents per $100 of a home’s assessed value. Homeowners are still paying more, of course, because property values in Austin have shot up 12 percent a year, on average, for the past five years.

The district’s exceptional creditworthiness among bond rating agencies and hefty reserves mean it gets very low interest rates on the money it borrows.

The $1 billion in bonds would be issued over a five-year period. The district expects to take on the debt as projects are ready to be built, and school officials said that will allow the district to layer on new debt as the outstanding debt is paid down.

District leaders said the current tax rate is projected to provide enough money to cover the bond repayment, adding that they are not banking on continued rapid inflation in the real estate market to cover the cost of the bond projects. The bond payback plan assumes an annual increase in property values of 7 percent in the first two years and 1.5 percent for all subsequent years.

Property values actually have a 10-year average growth rate of nearly 8 percent in addition to the five-year average growth rate of more than 12 percent since 2013.

“These assumptions about growth (in property values), people are wondering, ‘are these going to hold?’ ” said Nicole Conley Johnson, the district’s financial officer. “It’s fairly likely that we’re going to perform better, but we’re using conservative estimates.”

Critics point out that the district’s pledge to keep the tax rate flat does not mean tax bills won’t continue to rise. And they question the district’s continuing reliance on property value increases.

“It’s misleading to the public to pretend that a tax impact doesn’t exist,” said Roger Falk of the Travis County Taxpayers Association. “You can’t borrow money for free. It’s smoke and mirrors.”

Falk, who saw Austin’s real estate bust in the 1980s, said the district should use only current land values, instead of assuming they will continue to rise.

Falk’s group ran its own numbers using only the 2017 property tax rolls to show the district’s payback plan won’t work without more increases in land values.

“Markets go up and they go down,” Falk said. “They don’t always go up. … They should be using honest numbers.”

What if the Austin market tanks?

After the first couple of years, the district’s payback plan relies on a 1.5 percent per year increase in property tax revenue. But it says that can be accomplished without raising the tax rate.

The finance team for the Austin district says even if the real estate market softens — as it did from 2010 to 2013 — the district can still depend on a gradual increase.

The district also has $46 million in reserves, or savings, which school leaders will rely on if the values don’t grow.

The Greater Austin Chamber of Commerce’s board of directors gathered financial experts to crunch the numbers and concluded there was a very high probability the bond wouldn’t raise the school tax rate.

Ellen Wood, the board chairwoman, who also is a certified public accountant, examined the numbers herself.

“There is a very significant income stream already in place,” Wood said, “which, when coupled with very modest property valuation projected increases, more than accommodates repayment. … While regional economic forecasts rarely go beyond 12 months, we believe Austin ISD’s assumptions to maintain no tax rate increase are conservative and appropriate.”

But critics are quick to point out that with the increase in values, the actual tax bills will grow. And if it weren’t taking on $1 billion in new debt, the Austin district could lower its tax rate further to cancel out the increase in appraisals.

“You can’t borrow a billion dollars without paying more in taxes than you would pay without this new debt,” said Bill Aleshire, a former Travis County judge and a former tax collector.

What about the district’s cash-flow troubles?

Texas school finance is complicated. Districts in areas where land values are high, such as Austin, are required to give some of their tax money to the state to subsidize poorer districts in a so-called recapture payment. The higher the property values, the more the district must hand over in that recapture payment.

Austin pays the most of any district in the state. This year, the district is estimating its recapture payment to be $534 million, an increase of 32 percent, or $127.8 million, over last year. About $1,700 of the average $4,291 in school taxes that the owner of a home within the Austin district pays will go to subsidize other Texas districts.

The school district tax rate is made up of two parts, one that pays for maintenance and operations, and one that goes toward debt repayment. The recapture payment comes from the maintenance and operations portion of the budget, leaving less for for salaries, campus maintenance and school programs. Next year, 50 percent of the Austin district’s maintenance and operations must go to recapture.

The other side of the district’s ledger — its debt repayment fund — is more stable and not affected by those ever-increasing recapture payments.

Is AISD planning to use 20-year bonds for technology upgrades?

No. The district will issue the bonds as needed for the projects, commensurate with the life of the projects. The district will use short term bonds, paid back in about three to five years, to pay for computers while using at least 20-year bonds to pay for new schools.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Local

THE SUSPECT: Mark Conditt driven by personal issues — not hate, cops say
THE SUSPECT: Mark Conditt driven by personal issues — not hate, cops say

An unemployed 23-year-old who was home-schooled growing up and had dropped out of community college, Austin serial bomber suspect Mark Conditt struggled to adjust to adulthood. Interim Austin Police Chief Brian Manley said Wednesday evening that Conditt, a Pflugerville resident, left a “confession” in the form of a 25-minute video message...
Bombing suspect’s neighbors shocked by news of connection, death
Bombing suspect’s neighbors shocked by news of connection, death

The Austin bombing investigation has hit home for Pflugerville Mayor Victor Gonzales in a way he didn’t expect: Gonzales lives only two streets away from suspect Mark Conditt’s home. “It’s very shocking because you never think about these things,” Gonzales said. “We never think about a lot of things in life, and...
LCRA chief joins General Land Office to help situate Harvey survivors
LCRA chief joins General Land Office to help situate Harvey survivors

Lower Colorado River Authority general manager Phil Wilson is joining the Texas General Land Office for an “interim assignment” to help Hurricane Harvey survivors with short-term housing, Gov. Greg Abbott and Land Commissioner George P. Bush announced in a statement Wednesday. Wilson will stay on with the river authority, a job he&rsquo...
55 hours of terror, and a final blast
55 hours of terror, and a final blast

The trip wire that set off the fourth explosion in Austin’s horrifying March, authorities now chillingly say, was tied to a “caution, children at play” sign that the accused bomber had bought at a Home Depot. But the breaching of that wire and the resultant detonation Sunday, which sent two men to the hospital, also set off an increasingly...
Access to Google searches, cell technology helped crack bombing case
Access to Google searches, cell technology helped crack bombing case

Investigators have yet to reveal many of the details that allowed them to home in on Austin bombing suspect Mark Conditt, but one important development came by accessing the man’s Google search history. Authorities obtained a search warrant to view the suspect’s digital history, revealing suspicious searches that included addresses in the...
More Stories