breaking news

Sunset Valley FedEx store linked to Schertz bomb; company turns over evidence

Supreme Court reviews another Texas death penalty case


Texas death penalty case will test whether federal courts are meeting obligations on appeals.

Inmate argues that a tightfisted approach is blocking an investigation of potential mitigating evidence.

The U.S. Supreme Court takes on another Texas death penalty case Monday, and, like most reviews, this one focuses on whether the legal system is providing adequate protections before the ultimate punishment is enforced.

Defense lawyers are not challenging the guilt of Carlos Ayestas in the 1995 beating and strangulation death of 67-year-old Santiaga Paneque in her Houston home.

Rather, they’ll use Monday’s oral arguments in Washington to contend that federal courts are withholding money needed to properly investigate Ayestas’ schizophrenia, history of brain injuries and similar issues. Known as mitigating evidence, such information is supposed to be provided to jurors before they decide whether a capital murder defendant deserves to take responsibility for the crime by being put to death.

During a brief presentation in the punishment phase of Ayestas’ trial, the only mitigating evidence presented by defense lawyers came from a Harris County Jail teacher who described the inmate as a serious and attentive student.

RELATED: U.S. Supreme Court takes Ayestas death penalty case

Unless the federal courts reverse their tightfisted policies and provide money for a specialized investigator, defense lawyers say, Ayestas will be executed without any judge or juror hearing evidence that could have resulted in a sentence of life in prison, not death.

The Texas case “will test our commitment to fair trials,” not only for Ayestas but for other death row inmates, said Brandon Garrett, a law professor at the University of Virginia and author of the book “End of its Rope: How Killing the Death Penalty Can Revive Criminal Justice.”

‘Catch-22’ situation

The issue before the Supreme Court revolves around the U.S. Criminal Justice Act, which includes a provision ensuring that indigent death row inmates get court-provided money to hire investigators and experts who are “reasonably necessary” to pursue an appeal.

Ayestas requested a mitigation specialist to collect evidence that he argues should have been compiled by his trial lawyers and presented to his jury. That information could provide the evidence needed to show that his trial lawyers were deficient, requiring that Ayestas be given a new sentencing trial and a chance to ask jurors for a life sentence.

Ayestas’ request was rejected, and the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, saying the inmate did not demonstrate a “substantial need” for the expert.

Defense lawyers argue that the 5th Circuit Court’s “substantial need” requirement is improper — providing a tougher hurdle than the “reasonably necessary” standard in federal law — putting inmates in the “Catch-22” situation of having to show a court why the evidence is important before that evidence can be developed.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s top appellate lawyer, Solicitor General Scott Keller, plans to argue that the 5th Circuit Court has adopted a perfectly acceptable standard that mirrors similar legal requirements for death penalty appeals.

The standard allows judges to weed out weak claims that can drag out death penalty appeals, Texas officials told the Supreme Court in a brief, adding that the standard proposed by Ayestas’ lawyers “provides effectively no limit” on funding requests for appeals.

“Petitioners are not entitled to funding to undertake fishing expeditions to discover claims that may or may not exist,” the Texas brief said.

The brief also said the lower court properly denied Ayestas’ request for a mitigation specialist.

Defense lawyers must show a “substantial likelihood” that the information about Ayestas’ past would have prompted jurors to give him a life sentence instead of the death penalty, it said. But given the brutal nature of Paneque’s murder and other acts of violence by Ayestas, it is highly unlikely that evidence of mental illness, brain injuries or drug and alcohol abuse in his past would have changed the sentence, the Texas brief argued.

Defense lawyers plan to argue that Texas officials have missed the point.

“Courts do not rewrite statutes,” they told the Supreme Court. The law “means what it says: Courts should authorize services when they are reasonably — not substantially — necessary for the representation.”

Texas death penalty cases

A ruling is expected before the court’s term ends next summer, building on other recent decisions in Texas death penalty cases, including:

• In February, the Supreme Court tossed out the death sentence given to Duane Buck, an African-American, because a defense expert testified at his trial that black men were more likely to commit violence. In a deal with prosecutors, Buck was sentenced to life in prison for capital murder in October after pleading guilty to two additional counts of attempted murder.

• In March, the high court sided with death row inmate Bobby James Moore, ruling that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals had ignored scientific advances on how to measure intellectual disabilities, creating “an unacceptable risk” that intellectually disabled Texans will be executed. The Supreme Court ordered the Texas court to re-evaluate Moore’s eligibility for the death penalty using appropriate measures of disability. That review is still underway.

• In June, the Supreme Court ruled against death row inmate Erick Davila, upholding a 5th Circuit Court decision that limited inmates’ ability to challenge the effectiveness of appellate lawyers.

By far the nation’s most prolific death penalty state, Texas has executed six inmates in 2017 — Arkansas is second nationally with four — and there are four Texas executions scheduled through Jan. 30.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Local

PolitiFact: With no action on gun laws, kids are told to duck and yell
PolitiFact: With no action on gun laws, kids are told to duck and yell

Potentially fatal guidance for children has been conveyed to parents at PTA meetings while Congress avoids acting against guns used in school shootings, U.S. Senate candidate Beto O’Rourke told voters. At a Feb. 24 stop in Waco, the El Paso congressman said: “How (expletive) up is it that PTA meetings are now being conducted to help parents...
Police: YMCA Williamson County bookkeeper embezzled $21,000
Police: YMCA Williamson County bookkeeper embezzled $21,000

A former bookkeeper for the YMCA of Greater Williamson County is accused of embezzling more than $21,000 from the organization, according to an arrest affidavit. Cynthia Adams, 52, of Austin, was charged with theft, a state jail felony punishable by up to two years in jail. The chief executive officer of the YMCA of Greater Williamson County contacted...
JUST IN: Police give all clear after reports of suspicious package at Whole Foods in Southwest Austin
JUST IN: Police give all clear after reports of suspicious package at Whole Foods in Southwest Austin

Austin police have given the all-clear after reports of a suspicious package at the Whole Foods at Arbor Trails in Southwest Austin, officials said Tuesday afternoon.  The report at the grocery store at 4301 West William Cannon Dr. was received about 11:09 a.m., police said. KXAN-TV reported that the store was evacuated after the suspicious package...
Former NFL star Ricky Williams launches marijuana brand 
Former NFL star Ricky Williams launches marijuana brand 

Football never took too kindly to Ricky Williams’ affection for marijuana, but in his new business, it’s essential. The former running back, who won the Heisman Trophy in 1998 while at the University of Texas, is launching his own brand of marijuana. Williams, who played for three teams during an 11-year NFL career, now lives in Venice...
Trump says ‘it’s not easy to find’ culprit in first public comment on Austin bombings
Trump says ‘it’s not easy to find’ culprit in first public comment on Austin bombings

President Donald Trump made his first public comments Tuesday on the series of Austin bombings that killed two and left others injured. The first bombing occurred on March 2.  Trump called the bombings “terrible” and said that “working with local governments has been great.” Read the president’s full...
More Stories