breaking news

Appeals court halts, for now, abortion for immigrant teen in Texas

Texas appeals judge questions fairness of life without parole


Judge Larry Meyers, the longest-serving member of the state’s highest criminal court, has grown uncomfortable with the way Texas allows for life in prison without parole, calling it a slow-motion death sentence without the same legal protections given to defendants who face the death penalty.

It can be argued, Meyers said, that the prospect of decades of prison — ended only by death from old age, medical problems or even violence — is as harsh or harsher than execution.

Even so, life without parole can be given in some capital murder cases without jurors answering two questions that must be considered before issuing a death sentence — is the defendant a future danger to society, and are there any mitigating factors such as mental disability or childhood abuse that weigh against capital punishment?

“I’m not saying the death penalty is unconstitutional. I think right now it’s about as fair as it could be,” Meyers said. “But there are two variations of the death penalty; one is just longer than the other. People are getting a (life without parole) death sentence without the same safeguards and procedures that you get when there is a death sentence.”

RELATED CONTENT: Texas appeals court judge voices doubts on death penalty

Meyers, the only Democrat on the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, plans to make changing the life-without-parole system an issue of his re-election campaign, an admittedly uphill battle after he switched from the Republican Party in 2013 over disagreements in its direction under the surging tea party movement.

His Republican opponent in the Nov. 8 election, 22-year state District Judge Mary Lou Keel of Houston, believes Meyers has strayed from his principal task as a judge.

“Policy issues like this are best left to the Legislature,” Keel said. “Doesn’t he have enough work to do as a judge?”

Keel and Meyers are vying for one of the nine seats on a court that has the last word on criminal matters in Texas.

Death row down 40%

Life without parole, an option for capital murder cases since 2005, has been credited with helping to sharply reduce the number of death row inmates by allowing prosecutors to reserve capital punishment for the worst cases, yet ensure that other convicted murderers are permanently removed from society.

Since life without parole became an option, the population of Texas’ death row has fallen to 244 inmates, down about 40 percent, as the pace of executions has outstripped the number of new death sentences.

In contrast, 782 inmates were serving life without parole for capital murder as of July 31.

An additional 54 inmates are serving life without parole after repeat convictions for sexually violent offenses, including crimes against children, since the Legislature allowed the punishment for the crime of continuous sexual abuse in 2007.

GET THE DAY’S LATEST NEWS: Click here to sign up for our Afternoon Updates email

In capital murder cases, life without parole is handed down two ways:

• In cases in which the prosecutor seeks death by lethal injection, if jurors convict, a second trial begins over the punishment.

Prosecutors try to prove that the defendant will pose a future danger to society unless put to death, and defense lawyers attempt to convince jurors that execution isn’t the appropriate punishment. Jurors must be unanimous on the future danger question, and they must all reject the defense’s mitigating evidence.

If one juror disagrees on either point, the sentence automatically becomes life without parole.

• In cases in which the prosecutor waives the death penalty, life without parole is the only available option for capital murder.

Seeking life without parole is by far the simpler option. Jurors are easier to seat — death penalty opponents aren’t allowed on juries if execution is an option — and there is no punishment phase trial. The appeals process also is less rigorous, with death row inmates granted two appeals before the state’s highest criminal court, while inmates serving life without parole go through the normal process.

Meyers, a 23-year member of the Court of Criminal Appeals, believes life without parole has been made too simple, providing “an easy, inexpensive way of getting the death penalty.”

It would be fairer, he said, to let jurors consider some variation of the future danger question and to allow defense lawyers to present mitigating evidence. If jurors cannot agree that life without parole is appropriate, the defendant would get a life sentence and be eligible for parole after 40 years or some other suitable time, Meyers said.

The bigger reform — what Meyers called the “smarter fix” — would be for the Legislature to end capital punishment, making life without parole the ultimate punishment and including an option for parole.

The political reality in Texas, by far the nation’s top death penalty state, makes that an extremely unlikely option for legislators, Meyers admits. “But right now, as I see it, there’s just two options — both for death,” he said.

Change of heart

Meyers’ misgivings fall short of concerns raised by another judge on his court, Elsa Alcala, who said this summer that her confidence in the death penalty had been eroded after weighing appeals in cases with mistaken witness testimony, exonerations based on previously unavailable DNA tests and scientific advancements that have called earlier expert testimony into question.

Meyers said his change of heart on life without parole didn’t come about because of appeals. Nobody is going to tell his court that they improperly received a no-parole term when the alternative is a death sentence, he said.

Instead, Meyers said, his qualms arose after coming to see the sentence as a delayed death penalty — one that is particularly harsh on young people — when a typical murder conviction is often enough to lock away killers until they are no longer a danger.

When the Legislature debated life without parole in the mid-2000s, prosecutors were divided on the best course to take, but many opposed adding a “long, drawn-out” sentencing hearing to determine the difference between a no-parole sentence and parole eligibility after 40 years, said Shannon Edmonds, staff attorney with the Texas District and County Attorneys Association.

“You could argue that it’s not much difference. It was a lot of squeeze without much juice,” Edmonds said.

In addition, many capital murder cases are decided by a plea bargain that allows defendants to choose perpetual prison time over execution. Some prosecutors feared losing bargaining leverage to a defense lawyer who threatened, for example, to drag out a sentencing hearing for three weeks unless offered a sentence with parole for a lesser crime like murder, Edmonds said.

Life without parole raises questions about whether Texas is imprisoning people long past the point that they “will ever be dangerous,” said Kathryn Kase, executive director of Texas Defender Service, a nonprofit that provides capital murder legal representation at trial and on appeal.

“We’ve got places in prisons that look like nursing homes. It makes me wonder, as a taxpayer, are these people dangerous? Why are we paying the extra cost of imprisoning them when they are geriatrics?” Kase said.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Local

Killeen police searching for man accused of sexually assaulting 7-year-old
Killeen police searching for man accused of sexually assaulting 7-year-old

Authorities in Bell County are asking for the public’s help in searching for a man suspected of sexually assaulting a 7-year-old. According to Killeen police, authorities obtained an arrest warrant for Antoine Latrell Williams on Wednesday. He is accused of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Police believe he may be driving a black Nissan...
Appeals court halts, for now, abortion for immigrant teen in Texas
Appeals court halts, for now, abortion for immigrant teen in Texas

One day after a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to allow an undocumented teenage immigrant to have an abortion in Texas, an appeals court temporarily blocked the order and set oral arguments for Friday morning on whether to allow the procedure to occur. The order by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia still...
AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL: Here’s what we’re watching today
AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL: Here’s what we’re watching today

The Austin City Council is back today with a busy agenda. The council could move forward on an anti-lobbying ordinance update that has been months in the making that revises the city’s rules on contractor interactions with the city. The rules have revolved around waste contracts; the updated ordinance would shorten the period in which bidders...
AUSTIN POLICE CONTRACT: Thursday is last day for deal before impasse
AUSTIN POLICE CONTRACT: Thursday is last day for deal before impasse

Austin police and city officials are concluding negotiations today for a new employment contract that could either result in a new agreement or a possible impasse that could have serious impacts on officers and the city. The talks have spanned several months for a new contract and have ranged from friendly to contentious at times. Issues that remain...
Texas congresswoman on Weinstein: Sexual assault prevention ‘as much the woman's responsibility’
Texas congresswoman on Weinstein: Sexual assault prevention ‘as much the woman's responsibility’

U.S. Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson, whose district covers part of the Dallas area, has weighed in on the Harvey Weinstein sexual assault scandal. According to reports, Johnson puts some of the onus for preventing sexual assault on female assault victims. According to Fort Worth NBC affiliate KXAS, Johnson said: The TV station reports that Johnson...
More Stories