You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myStatesman.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myStatesman.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myStatesman.com.

Texas clerks look to derail web-based public access to court records


Highlights

The re:SearchTX service is currently available to judges; it’ll be rolled out to everyone else by this summer.

Travis County plans to have an online service independent of re:SearchTX within the next year.

Texas court clerks are resisting a state proposal they say would strip them of their constitutional authority by making court documents available online for easy public access.

The statewide database, re:SearchTX, holds records from all 254 counties and is backed by the state’s Supreme Court. It currently is used by judges and soon will be available to attorneys and the public — who could search for civil court records and review them, all from the comfort of home.

Clerks say surrendering these records to a privately operated database would violate their role as custodians; the other side says this is an overstatement, and that taxpayers, not clerks, own the records. Clerks also say their departments will lose money with the public no longer having to head to a courthouse and pay printing fees of up to $1 a page. However, their opponents point out that the new system is set up so clerks would benefit from online users.

The clerks hope the Legislature will stop the new system through a bill introduced recently by state Rep. Travis Clardy, R-Nacogdoches, who contends that clerks and commissioners courts should decide whether their counties participate in the service. Clardy said the plan is fraught with problems, including maintaining privacy for documents that contain sensitive material such as Social Security numbers and record expungements.

“Clerks want assurance if those records are used by a private enterprise they are handled appropriately,” Clardy said.

Blake Hawthorne, clerk of court of the Texas Supreme Court, said Clardy’s bill “would kill the system.”

That would be fine with clerks, or at least the nearly half who objected to the database among 129 who responded to a survey administered by the state Office of Court Administration in 2015. In that same survey, 98 percent of attorneys said they would use the database, which, if approved, would bring uniformity to how court records are kept across all 254 counties.

“I don’t see how it violates their rights as custodians,” said Joseph Larsen, a Houston-based First Amendment attorney who is on the board of the Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas. “They are made the custodians, but I don’t know that they have a right so much as they have a duty. The records are public. They’re not the clerks’ records; they’re the public’s records.”

Only civil court documents are accessible through re:SearchTX, and even those are limited to exclude family cases such as divorce and child custody. At some point, criminal court documents could be added, according to David Slayton, the administrative director of the Office of Court Administration.

Slayton said the database offers convenience because people now can get their hands on documents from their personal computer rather than going to the courthouse during business hours and printing copies.

“They are the most public records that government has,” Slayton said. “They are open for public inspection.”

The service will not cost the state additional money; it will be covered by an $18 million e-filing fee the state pays a third-party vendor.

Travis County has independent plans in the next year to launch an online database similar to re:Search TX. And it will have a wider variety of court records than re:SearchTX because it will also house documents filed pro se, meaning by people who represent themselves without an attorney. Viewing documents in Travis County’s system will be free; re:SearchTX charges 10 cents a page up to $6, with the money going to the county where the document originated.

Travis County will lose an estimated $300,000 a year from not collecting printing costs, according to District Clerk Velva Price. There will still be a charge for official copies.

Price said she’s concerned that lawmakers are moving too fast to launch re:SearchTX.

“They have not worked out technicalities,” she said.

A total of 95 Texas counties, including Bastrop, have passed resolutions opposing the new system.

Clerks voiced concerns at a Jan. 20 meeting in Austin and were given 45 days to suggest tweaks. There will be a final vote March 3, but Parker County District Clerk Sharena Gilliland, who chairs the re:SearchTX committee, said, “I’m afraid the decision has been made.

“I would love for us to be able to visit with the Supreme Court and the Office of Court Administration and stop where we’re at with this research database and go back to the drawing board,” Gilliland said. “If they have real concerns about making things easier in the internet age, of course, we would be willing to talk. But there’s easier ways to go about that goal other than violating the Constitution.”



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Texas News & Politics

Judge says Houston-area bail system unfair to poor offenders

A judge rebuked Houston-area authorities for imposing a bail system that’s unfair to people arrested for lesser offenses who are detained for long periods because they’re unable to pay for their release. The ruling Friday by Chief U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal was part of a lawsuit from a single mother who was held for two days on a...
One killed in rollover crash in Southeast Austin
One killed in rollover crash in Southeast Austin

SOUTHEAST AUSTIN EMS: 1 dead in rollover crash A man believed to be in his 20s was killed Saturday in a single-vehicle rollover crash in Southeast Austin, Austin-Travis County EMS reported. Medics responded to the crash near the 4400 block of East William Cannon Drive just west of the intersection with South Pleasant Valley Road at 3:52 p.m. The man...
Nonprofit serves up plates of would-be food waste to raise awareness
Nonprofit serves up plates of would-be food waste to raise awareness

As a live band played groovy music, Anna Santucci welcomed shoppers eyeing the spread of food at her booth in the Sustainable Food Center Farmers’ Market with the same greeting: “Hi, can I make you a plate?” she’d say, as she began filling a plate with greens, fruit salad, beans, guacamole, bread and crackers. The free meals...
Even 20 years on, everyone’s still a wiener at Buda’s dachshund races
Even 20 years on, everyone’s still a wiener at Buda’s dachshund races

“On your mark, get set … go!” As the gates on a grassy field in Buda City Park opened, seven tiny wiener dogs ran as fast as their little legs would take them into the open arms of their owners. This weekend marks the 20th year that the dashing dachshunds are competing against one another for a good cause at the Buda Lions Club Country...
EMS: One person killed in rollover crash in Southeast Austin
EMS: One person killed in rollover crash in Southeast Austin

A man believed to be in his 20s was killed Saturday in a single-vehicle rollover crash in Southeast Austin, Austin-Travis County EMS reported. Medics responded to the crash near the 4400 block of East William Cannon Drive at 3:52 p.m. The man was pronounced dead at the scene of the crash. Three others were involved in the crash but refused care or...
More Stories