breaking news

Trump intends to declare North Korea a state sponsor of terror

How the felony corruption case against Rep. Dawnna Dukes unraveled


Charges hinge on when Texas House rules allow lawmakers to take travel pay.

Prosecutors have until Oct. 30 to decide whether to proceed with felony charges against Dukes.

On Sept. 6, as they were preparing for their corruption trial against state Rep. Dawnna Dukes, a group of Travis County prosecutors went to the Capitol to meet with witnesses they believed were on their side, an official with knowledge of the case recounted.

The first meeting was with Steve Adrian, the director of the House Business Office who previously had told a state investigator and a prosecutor in separate meetings in 2016 that lawmakers are not allowed to collect travel reimbursement pay between legislative sessions unless they go to their offices in the Capitol. That rule is the basis of a 12-count felony indictment against Dukes that alleges the 12-term Austin Democrat tampered with government records by submitting travel reimbursement forms for days that she did not go to the Capitol in 2013 and 2014.

The second meeting was with Rep. Charlie Geren, a Fort Worth Republican and chairman of the House Administration Committee. The prosecutors assumed Geren would corroborate what Adrian had said about the rules in the past.

After all, the House Policy & Procedure Manual is clear: Lawmakers can claim the reimbursement up to 12 times per month if they travel “to Austin to attend to legislative duties in their office.” State representatives reached by the American-Statesman said they have long understood the rule to mean that they could not collect the pay without going to the Capitol.

READ: House official blamed for crimping felony charges against Dawnna Dukes

But Adrian dropped a bombshell on the prosecutors — saying that, despite the written rule, it is the House’s practice to allow members to take the pay even if they don’t go to their Capitol offices — and Geren backed him up, said the source, who asked not to be identified because the investigation is ongoing. Adrian also revealed to prosecutors for the first time that he had in early 2017 given a statement to Dukes’ attorneys.

The prosecutors were flabbergasted. Dukes, who has pleaded not guilty to the felony charges as well as two misdemeanor corruption charges for unrelated incidents, could now argue in court that she could have collected the $61.50 per day checks even if she didn’t go to the Capitol and that the state consequently didn’t lose any money if she lied on the forms, which is often a successful defense against charges of tampering with government records.

Adrian’s reversal was the latest twist in the two-year saga of the Dukes case that has seen the veteran lawmaker make and break a deal with prosecutors, promise to leave office and then renege on that promise and win re-election with more than 70 percent of the vote as a Texas Rangers investigation loomed over her.

Reeling from the Adrian revelation, prosecutors asked for a delay in the felony case and were instructed by a judge to decide whether they are going to “fish or cut bait” by Oct. 30. If they move forward, the trial will begin in December.

READ: Judge gives prosecutors ultimatum in Dukes corruption case

Shaun Clarke, an attorney for Dukes, said that prosecutors should drop the charges because of the ambiguity.

“You can’t make a criminal case when the rules aren’t clear,” Clarke said. “Criminal cases should be reserved for those situations where there is a clear and intentional violation of the law.”

Although they no longer planned to call him as a witness if there is a trial, prosecutors took Adrian before a grand jury to probe him on his apparent about-face.

Adrian did not return a request for comment. The district attorney’s office declined to comment.

In an interview, Geren said that the House gives lawmakers significant leeway to interpret the rule.

“That’s always been the case,” he said.

READ: Dukes’ $51,000 bill for psychic is exhibit in corruption trial

Geren said that he personally would not collect reimbursement for traveling to a lunch in Fort Worth with constituents but that lawmakers can and do collect the pay if they do legislative work in Austin, even if they’re not at the Capitol. About half of Dukes’ district is in Austin.

Geren declined to comment on whether Dukes ran afoul of the rules, saying he’s not a lawyer. Geren said he did not coordinate with Adrian on their interpretations of the rule.

3 lawmakers have different reading

Lawmakers reached by the American-Statesman gave a different account of when the House allows them to collect the travel pay.

“It was just the general understanding that it was intended to be for work at the Capitol,” Rep. Tony Dale, R-Cedar Park, said. “I thought it was pretty clear. … I thought you had to go to your office and work there.”

Rep. Donna Howard, D-Austin, said that she does not believe the rule covers work done outside the Capitol.

“I’ve read the rule,” Howard said. “It says business in your office, so my assumption was it means business in your office.”

One instance Geren cited to prosecutors in which lawmakers could collect the pay without going to the Capitol was for those who have large rural districts and need to travel great distances.

Rep. Alfonso “Poncho” Nevárez, an Eagle Pass Democrat whose massive West Texas district is the largest in the state, said that he does not believe that the travel pay, which lawmakers call per diem, could be used for in-district travel. Other forms of reimbursement, like for mileage, cover that, he said.

READ: How Dawnna Dukes is delaying her corruption case

“The per diem is earned the way we earn it in the regular session — by being there,” he said of the travel reimbursement, which lawmakers are paid automatically during legislative sessions under the assumption that they are at the Capitol.

The inquiry into Dukes began when former staffers raised questions about her conduct, prompting an investigation by the State Auditor’s Office that was soon turned over to the Texas Rangers and the Travis County district attorney’s office.

One of the ex-staffers told the Statesman last year that the lawmaker did not travel to the Capitol for all of the days that she claimed but directed her staff to prepare the forms as if she did.

Dukes specified on the reimbursement forms, which the Statesman obtained through an open records request, that she “traveled by personal car to the Capitol” to attend to legislative duties.

Dukes, according to the grand jury indictment, made “a false entry in a government record, and present and use said government record with knowledge of its falsity, by instructing her staff to add a false entry to her State of Texas Travel Voucher Form.”

The felony counts — one of which has been dropped due to a clerical error by investigators — each carry maximum of sentences of up to two years in prison, while the misdemeanors are up to one year.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Texas News & Politics

San Antonio photojournalist facing inauguration charges goes on trial
San Antonio photojournalist facing inauguration charges goes on trial

Opening statements are scheduled Monday in the trial of independent photojournalist Alexei Wood, the first of several people facing riot charges related to the Jan. 20 Trump inauguration to go to trial. Wood, who is based in San Antonio, was livestreaming a protest on Facebook, capturing tense moments as the protesters were corralled by police. The...
Austin police union OKs contract terms; pact needs city council approval
Austin police union OKs contract terms; pact needs city council approval

The votes are in, and the union for Austin’s police officers has decided to approve a proposed five-year employment contract with the city. The proposed deal, approved by 85 percent of the union members, now goes to the Austin City Council, which will decide whether to implement it or scrap it. The proposal would raise officers’ base pay...
Austin City Council to hold special meeting Monday on city manager finalists
Austin City Council to hold special meeting Monday on city manager finalists

Austin City Council will convene a special meeting Monday at 8:45 a.m. to interview finalists to be hired as the city’s permanent city manager. According to a statement from the city, the meeting will start in the Boards and Commissions Room at City Hall, 301 W. Second Street, before moving to executive session for discussions on legal and personnel...
FORECAST: Cool, crisp, sunny Monday in 60s; clear skies all Thanksgiving week
FORECAST: Cool, crisp, sunny Monday in 60s; clear skies all Thanksgiving week

Monday forecast for Austin: With family and loved ones in town and schoolchildren in Austin taking the week off, the week couldn’t be nicer for everyone to enjoy autumn in Central Texas. The National Weather Service outlook for Monday calls for sunshine with temperatures climbing to a mild 68 degrees. Nighttime temperatures will slip to around...
Community news: H-E-B hosts Feast of Sharing on Tuesday

TRAVIS COUNTY SOUTH AUSTIN Feast of Sharing on Tuesday H-E-B will host its 28th annual Feast of Sharing dinner from 4 to 8 p.m. Tuesday at the Palmer Events Center, 900 Barton Springs Road. The free event will include live entertainment and a children’s area. The meal will include turkey, mashed potatoes, a vegetable medley, pies, dinner rolls...
More Stories