You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.


  • ePAPER

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks


Welcome to

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on

How many racing dogs failed drug tests? In Texas, that’s confidential

Why would a state agency voluntarily publish information for years – and then, when directly asked for the same material, suddenly decide it’s confidential? That’s what the Texas Racing Commission did last month, in what open records experts describe as the latest example of the erosion of laws the public depends on to pry essential information from the government.

The Texas Public Information Act is a basic tool of journalists, detailing what government records must be made public and, if necessary, providing a framework for forcing dawdling or obstructionist agencies to cough up the goods. Yet many others use the act, too — for advocacy work, policy research or simply just out of curiosity.

It was advocacy that led Carey Theil to send a public information request to the racing commission, the agency that regulates horse and dog racing in Texas. As executive director of the Massachusetts-based anti-greyhound racing organization GREY2K USA, Theil often submits requests to regulators in search of information useful to his organization’s mission of watchdogging the dog racing industry.

In August, when Theil submitted his request for the number of times dogs had tested positive for a banned drug, he didn’t think it would be a big deal. After all, through 2011, the commission itself had published the data in its annual reports.

An agency spokesman, Robert Elrod, said the commission stopped publishing the drug testing summaries in 2012 not for any legal or public policy reason, but simply in an effort to streamline its documents. Positive drug tests among racing dogs also were uncommon, he added. In 2011, for example, agency inspectors tested 6,195 dog urine samples and found 14 suspicious results.

To Theil, however, the low numbers were immaterial. The test results at the very least prove the regulatory agency is adequately performing one of its most basic jobs, he said. They also could show any doping trends important for the public to know, he said.

So he was surprised to learn that the commission had kicked his request to the Office of the Attorney General to ask if the test result information could be withheld from GREY2K. The state attorney general’s office is the first line of appeal in open records disputes.

Kelley Shannon, executive director of the Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas, said in recent years her organization has observed a steady increase among government agencies seeking such attorney general opinions as a tactic to withhold information or delay its release. “We see a lot seeking attorney general rulings at the drop of a hat,” she said.

Another reason, she suspects, is a flurry of higher court decisions that has had the effect of making confidential records once considered open and available to anyone who asked. As a result, open records laws “are being chipped away at. There seems to be a tendency of closing up information and keeping it off limits to the public,” Shannon said.

In its letter seeking to deny releasing the numbers to GREY2K, the commission argued that the dog drug test results were considered part of its investigations, and that the Texas Racing Act regards any information related to an investigation as confidential. According to the agency’s rules, the records become public only if a suspicious test results in a criminal proceeding, is discussed by the commission in a hearing or if the person being investigated gives his or her permission to release the information.

Yet GREY2K wasn’t looking for test results from a particular dog or owner, but rather aggregate annual industrywide figures for Texas – exactly what the agency had previously published. Other states – notably Florida, which boasts most of the country’s dog tracks — routinely release such information, Theil said.

By refusing to release such information, “If you’re following (the Texas Racing Commission’s) argument, they shouldn’t even be telling us how many drug tests there are,” he said.

Two weeks ago, Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office issued its opinion: The agency could legally withhold the test result numbers from GREY2K – and, now, from anyone else who asked for them in the future.

Elrod said the ruling confirms that the commission’s rules prohibit it from releasing the information. “I don’t know why the information was previously printed in the annual report,” he said. “But its presence there prior to 2012 wouldn’t excuse its improper release now.”

Theil has another view. “When a racing regulator won’t even tell the public how many positive drug tests there were – that’s crazy,” he said. “It is inherently bad public policy for them to be hidden from the public.”

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Texas News & Politics

Slight chance for showers expected on Tuesday morning, severe storms coming overnight
Slight chance for showers expected on Tuesday morning, severe storms coming overnight

Tuesday forecast for Austin: Forecasters are calling for increasing chances for showers throughout the day on Tuesday before some potentially heavy storms arrive overnight. According to the National Weather Service, the Austin metro area will see around a 20 percent chance of showers and thunderstorms on Thursday with highs near 85 degrees. At 6 a...
FROM OVERNIGHT: Why Austin campus closures still remain in the district’s future
FROM OVERNIGHT: Why Austin campus closures still remain in the district’s future

Austin school consolidations and closures are not off the table. While the names of schools recommended for consolidation were removed, the criteria for campus closures remains. A facilities committee charged with creating a comprehensive plan to modernize the district’s schools. And five underenrolled schools now are being identified for...
In Hays County, water fight springs anew
In Hays County, water fight springs anew

Two years after expanding the reach of an Austin-area groundwater district to regulate pumping in Hays County, lawmakers are considering measures that would water down oversight. The measures appear to favor Greg LaMantia — a politically connected South Texas beer distributor and owner of the 5,000-acre Needmore Ranch east of Wimberley &mdash...
LEGISLATIVE DIGEST: Voter ID bill gets initial approval
LEGISLATIVE DIGEST: Voter ID bill gets initial approval

VOTER ID Voter ID bill gets initial approval Over Democratic objections, the Texas Senate gave initial approval Monday to a bill that would loosen several requirements in the state’s voter ID law while creating a harsh penalty for violations. Senate Bill 5 would codify many of the court-ordered changes to the 2011 law after a federal appeals...
Sessions’ threat to pull funds won’t affect Travis County, officials say
Sessions’ threat to pull funds won’t affect Travis County, officials say

After U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday threatened to “claw back” Justice Department grants from so-called sanctuary communities, Travis County officials said they believe the county won’t be affected despite the sheriff’s office’s refusal to turn jail inmates suspected of living in the country illegally over...
More Stories