Austin follows through on lawsuit to block ‘sanctuary cities’ ban


Highlights

The city of Austin filed suit Friday to join onto a suit filed Thursday against Senate Bill 4.

Multiple lawsuits now challenge the state’s ability to create so-called immigration law.

The suits also allege SB 4 violates numerous other provisions in the Constitution.

The city of Austin followed through on a promise to challenge the state’s controversial “sanctuary cities” ban on Friday with a court filing that now unites it with the city of San Antonio and numerous advocacy groups in their fight to block Senate Bill 4 before it takes effect.

Calling Austin’s public safety a political football state lawmakers kicked around the Capitol that ultimately resulted in a dangerous law, Austin Mayor Steve Adler said it was time to move the fight to a different venue.

“We want our day in court,” Adler said.

SB 4 creates civil and criminal penalties for police and elected officials — including arrest or removal from office — if they block cooperation with federal requests to detain jail inmates suspected of being in the country illegally. It also allows police to inquire about a person’s immigration status during routine police encounters, such as traffic stops.

Gov. Greg Abbott signed the bill last month and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Austin hours later in what many saw as a pre-emptive strike to have a judge declare the law constitutional. Though Austin was destined to defend itself in federal court over SB 4, joining San Antonio’s suit against the law allows the cities to argue it should be blocked.

Austin’s legal challenge, which the City Council voted to pursue last month, takes the form of a “complaint in intervention” that allows the city to join a suit that San Antonio filed in federal court on Thursday. The city and county of El Paso have sued along with the town of El Cenizo, Maverick County and numerous advocacy groups.

As the legal challenges to SB 4 have rolled in, a consensus of arguments against the law is beginning to emerge.

The central challenge in both Austin and San Antonio’s filings has been against the state’s ability to create immigration laws, a power the U.S. Constitution reserves for the federal government in part so foreign governments don’t end up dealing with a patchwork of immigration laws.

That part of the Constitution was cited in a 2012 Supreme Court ruling that blocked several parts of Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070, a law with a section similar to SB 4’s “show me your papers” provision that empowers local law enforcement to inquire about a person’s immigration status during routine interactions.

The lawsuits also say SB 4 violates the Fourth Amendment because it could lead to jail detentions for immigration violations, which are civil infractions, not criminal offenses. The cities also argue that SB 4 might violate elected officials’ First Amendment rights because it bars them from endorsing sanctuary policies, a provision critics believe is overly vague.

Several 14th Amendment violations are alleged along with claims that the law would encourage racial profiling and discrimination.

“The result of the threatened implementation of SB 4 has been a breakdown in public trust, as affected individuals feel they cannot contact municipal and nongovernmental agencies for fear of immigration enforcement,” Austin’s suit said.

The city’s filing on Friday states that Austin would suffer economic harm if the bill is allowed to take effect. The city could see a drop in international tourism for the South by Southwest Festival and Circuit of the Americas events because visitors might fear enhanced immigration enforcement measures, the filing says. The state could also face boycotts like Arizona did after that state passed its controversial law in 2010.

The Austin filing also states that local policing could suffer. It posits that a police officer might be forced under the law to assist federal immigration authorities performing operations in Austin while a more urgent public safety matter might be unfolding because the law prohibits local police from refusing to assist federal authorities in any instance.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Texas News & Politics

Austin school district chooses buyers for high-profile properties
Austin school district chooses buyers for high-profile properties

Austin school leaders are moving forward with the sales of the district’s downtown headquarters, the Baker Center and the Millett Opera House (home of the Austin Club), among other surplus properties. The school board next Monday is scheduled to vote on the sales of these properties: • The Carruth Center, the 2.7-acre district headquarters...
Rally planned tonight at Austin City Hall for Transgender Day of Remembrance
Rally planned tonight at Austin City Hall for Transgender Day of Remembrance

A rally is planned tonight at Austin City Hall as part of the international Transgender Day of Remembrance. The purpose of this event is to raise awareness of hate crimes committed against the transgender community. Austin’s event will begin at 7:30 p.m.   The event is held in November to honor Rita Hester, a transgender woman who was...
Lawsuit prompts UT to lift student’s suspension for sexual misconduct
Lawsuit prompts UT to lift student’s suspension for sexual misconduct

The University of Texas has lifted – at least for now – the suspension of a student it accused of sexual misconduct for having sex with another student who says she was intoxicated when she gave consent after a 2016 sorority formal. In a document filed Monday in U.S. Western District Court, the university asked a federal judge to cancel...
Union leader: Border agent might have been beaten to death with rocks

A U.S. Border Patrol agent who was killed while on patrol in West Texas might have been beaten to death by attackers wielding rocks, according to the president of the National Border Patrol Council. Brandon Judd, president of the labor union, said Agent Rogelio Martínez, 36, died Sunday of blunt force trauma to the head. “I have been told...
Proposed police contract heads for City Council after union approval
Proposed police contract heads for City Council after union approval

After approval from the Austin police union, a proposed five-year police employment contract is now ready to go to the Austin City Council, which will decide whether to implement it or scrap it. The proposed deal, approved by 85 percent of the union members, would raise officers’ base pay 9.5 percent over five years. Patrol officers also...
More Stories