Do Austin development fees outpace Dallas fees nearly 10 times over?


Highlights

Paul Workman, a Texas House member, made an Austin-Dallas comparison reviewed by PolitiFact Texas.

Workman, R-Austin, said that Austin’s apartment development fees outpace Dallas’s fees by nearly 10 times.

City officials in the cities confirmed some of Workman’s cited figures, finding others flawed.

Still, it looks like Austin’s fees outrun Dallas’s fees by about 8 times.

PolitiFact Texas found this claim to be Mostly True.

An Austin Republican applauding Gov. Greg Abbott for trying to rein in regulations imposed by cities says municipal fees for building an apartment complex in Austin run nearly 10 times ahead of what’s charged in Dallas.

Readers asked us to check that.

State Rep. Paul Workman said in a June commentary in the Austin American-Statesman: “I have received a document from an apartment builder that demonstrates the difference in total development fees for building a project in Dallas versus building the same project in Austin. Total fees in Dallas: $120,081. Total fees in Austin: $1,026,852 — nearly 10-times higher for the same project! There is no way to argue that these fees are not contributing to the affordability crisis in Austin.”

To our inquiry, Brian Mitchell in Workman’s office emailed us an undated document showing fees attributed to the cities of Dallas and Austin, respectively, in each case toward construction of a four-story, 243,000-square-foot, 322-unit apartment project.

Next, John Burnham of Argyle Residential, which develops multifamily projects, told us he created the document in June 2016 or so. Burnham said by phone the Austin figures on the document relate to a 322-unit project, anticipated at Gonzales and Tillery streets in East Austin, and the Dallas figures were based on adjusting up city fees associated with plans to build a 260-unit project on the east side of Dallas.

Burnham said by email: “I was not attempting to display a summary of actual fees paid on a specific project. The fees that I outlined are accurate fees based on adopted ordinances and city codes.”

We ran the document past city officials in Austin and Dallas, hearing back that the comparison missed some fees while overstating and understating a few. Still, Austin’s fees far outpaced what Dallas confirmed as its charges.

By email, a Dallas city spokesman, Richard Hill, provided a document indicating total fee costs of $124,792.02, some $4,711 or 4 percent greater than the total fee costs estimated by Burnham.

A big added cost, according to the city, would come from at least $23,000 for a base permit for the complex’s garage, compared with $16,645 in Burnham’s document. The Dallas document also specifies $1,500 in fees for up to three engineering reviews of paving, grading and drainage, as well as $2,690.66 for a fire sprinkler review for the garage. The document cited by Workman did not specify those fees.

The Dallas document also suggests some lower costs than estimated by Burnham, such as $8,250 related to the city’s express review of the development plan compared with $12,000 estimated by Burnham.

A city of Austin spokeswoman, Sylvia Arzola, confirmed most of the fees listed in the Workman-cited document. But she said the garage fees would be about $6,000 lower if that facility didn’t have plumbing and wasn’t heated or air-conditioned.

Also, Arzola said, the Workman-cited document missed the city’s Commercial Building Plan Review fee, which is calculated based on a builder’s valuation of labor and materials. Working from the city’s web post of commercial review and permit fees, it looked to us like the fee on the project would start at $655.20 plus $1.30 for every $1,000 in labor-materials.

Arzola noted that a major cost shown for Austin and not Dallas — the parkland dedication fee — increased as of October 2016. So the up-to-date charge would be $346,230, nearly $43,000 greater than what Workman cited.

Another wide contrast: Both cities, the Workman-cited document says, charge a fee for domestic water and wastewater meters, but Austin’s fee of $380,000 greatly outpaces the listed Dallas fee of $7,380. (Hill’s document suggests the Dallas costs would be lower yet.)

By phone, Joseph Gonzales, a finance administrator for the Austin Water Utility, said the document’s Austin figures for the meter fees looked accurate. Asked to speak to Austin charging considerably more than Dallas for such fees, Gonzales said: “We’re trying to balance the impact of development between the development community and our ratepayers.”

Generally, Carl Wren, assistant director of Austin’s Development Services Department, told us some Austin fees reflect the greater complexity of the city’s municipal code. Dallas, for instance, doesn’t have the Save Our Springs limits put in place in the 1990s to protect waters flowing into Barton Springs.

David Stauch, president of Capital Project Management, an Austin construction company, said he’s helped build projects in both cities. Stauch said Austin’s plan review fees run considerably higher, “likely owing to the greater number of departmental reviews required and the greater level of scrutiny by each.”

Perhaps, Stauch said, it’s a trade-off for the quality of the improvements made compared with the natural environment, “but folks in Dallas like it just fine.”

“Increased fees might also be due to Austin’s low density,” Stauch said. The more spread out a city is, the more infrastructure needed to serve the residents.” A 2015 U.S. Census Bureau report based on 2013 population estimates pegs the density of Dallas at 3,684 residents per square mile, 29 percent greater than Austin’s density of 2,855 residents per square mile.

Brian Rodgers, an Austin civic activist and real estate investor, said it makes good sense for developers to pay for the impact of their development on public infrastructure. Rodgers noted that it’s been state law since 1989 that cities may recoup water, wastewater, roads and drainage costs related to extending city services.

“Austin doesn’t charge” developer fees “for roads or drainage,” Rodgers added.

Our ruling

Workman said it’s documented that city of Austin fees for building an apartment complex are nearly 10 times Dallas’s fees.

We found accurate multiple itemized entries in the document cited by Workman, though it also was missing fees and some figures weren’t right. On balance, it looks like city fees for building the project in Austin could exceed Big D’s fees by eight times or more.

We rate the claim Mostly True.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Texas News & Politics

Boy with 10-pound tumor on face dies after surgery in Florida
Boy with 10-pound tumor on face dies after surgery in Florida

A 14-year-old boy who recently underwent surgery to remove a 10-pound tumor from his face has died, according to news reports. Emanuel Zayas developed the benign tumor while suffering from polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, a genetic disorder in which fibrous tissue begins to replace bone in the body. “Our condolences and prayers for Emanuel's family...
Florida man dead after diving in underwater caves
Florida man dead after diving in underwater caves

A 50-year-old Florida man is dead after cave diving in Weeki Wachee Springs State Park this weekend, officials said. Davin Brannon, 53, of Dover, was diving in the Eagle’s Nest cave around noon Saturday when Hernando County Sheriff officials were called about a diver in distress. By the time crews arrived at the Chassahowitzka Wildlife Management...
Pope Francis jokes with cloistered nuns in Peru
Pope Francis jokes with cloistered nuns in Peru

Pope Francis drew appreciative laughter Sunday when he addressed cloistered nuns in a Peruvian church, Reuters reported. The nuns were given special permission to leave their convents to see the pontiff speak in Lima. Francis spoke to the 500 nuns, known as “contemplatives” because they rarely venture away from their convents, on his...
Toddler at center of Texas Amber Alert found by police, is safe
Toddler at center of Texas Amber Alert found by police, is safe

UPDATE, 1/21/2018, 1:56 P.M.: Texas police said the 18-month-old boy at the center of an Amber Alert was found safe northeast of his San Antonio home, around noon Sunday, KENS reported. The boy's father and suspect was found "in grave condition" due to a self-inflicted gunshot wound, police told KENS. The toddler, Aaron Joseph Concepcion...
UPDATE: San Antonio murder suspect has been shot, toddler unharmed
UPDATE: San Antonio murder suspect has been shot, toddler unharmed

A man suspected of fatally shooting a woman and then driving away with their 18-month-old child on Sunday was found hours later, gravely injured from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, officials said. The child was found unharmed in the backseat of the man’s truck in Guadalupe County. San Antonio police say Richard Concepcion, 37, is suspected in...
More Stories