You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.


  • ePAPER

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks


Welcome to

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on

Amid tough session for UT, bill could cut utility easement income, too


The Rio Grande Electric Cooperative’s $220,000 easement fee is projected to exceed $500,000 in 2024.

A House bill would give the cooperative and hundreds of other easement holders new power to contest fees.

It’s been a tough legislative session for the University of Texas System.

Chancellor Bill McRaven scuttled plans for a campus of sorts in Houston under pressure from angry lawmakers. A proposal to transfer the university-owned, city-operated Lions Municipal Golf Course in Austin to the state parks department has won easy Senate approval. And the UT System’s 14 academic and health campuses are virtually certain to see a decline in appropriations when the two-year budget is finalized.

Now the Legislature is considering House Bill 1882, which would dramatically increase the power of hundreds of electric utilities, pipeline companies, oil and natural gas operators, and other companies to challenge and potentially reduce fees that the system charges for easements on its vast West Texas lands. The system estimates that it would lose $60 million in easement fees over the next six years.

Revenues from easements, oil and gas production, ranching and other activities on the system’s 2.1 million acres, an endowment established by the state in the 1800s, benefit 14 UT System campuses and 13 Texas A&M University System campuses and agencies. The two systems collected a total of $25.9 million in easement revenue in their most recent budget year.

In a twist, HB 1882 was filed at the behest of just one easement holder, the Rio Grande Electric Cooperative Inc. The cooperative has seen its fee for a 35-mile transmission line in Hudspeth County, which borders Mexico, rise from $55,000 in 1994 to $220,000. The UT System projects that the price will jump to $531,000 in 2024. Easement holders must pay a fee once every 10 years.

“The way they’ve been increasing prices, I’m scared to death thinking about where this is ultimately going to get to,” said Dan Laws, general manager and chief executive of the Rio Grande cooperative, which has an annual budget of $42 million.

The cooperative provides power to 6,300 residential and commercial customers in a 750-mile stretch of West Texas that includes Big Bend National Park and rural communities such as Presidio and Marfa. Laws said $50,000 would be a reasonable easement charge.

UT System officials say the rates are adjusted periodically as a result of market surveys and are standardized for various types of uses, and, in the case of a transmission line, they are based on the length of the line and its voltage. What’s more, the officials note, the cooperative is the only easement holder out of more 500 that has contested — unsuccessfully, thus far — its fee using an appeal process established in 2011 by the Legislature at the cooperative’s request.

That appeal process gives the UT System Board of Regents the final say on fees.

“It’s an in-house appeal process, and folks are telling me that it’s kind of a wink and a nod kind of appeal process,” state Rep. Tracy O. King, D-Uvalde, the author of HB 1882, said last week during a hearing of the House Land and Resource Management Committee.

King said during an interview later that he wasn’t accusing the UT System of dealing in bad faith.

“I think they’ve done exactly what the law requires them to do,” he said. “It’s just that the law doesn’t require them to do a whole lot.”

His measure would allow an appraiser or an arbitrator to set the price in a dispute using a procedure that focuses mainly on the value of the land along the easement, which would be less than the going rate for using the land for an easement, according to system officials.

King’s measure would also violate the Texas Constitution, according to a system white paper and testimony by its general counsel for university lands.

The system points to a passage in Article 7 of the Constitution that grants the Board of Regents authority to manage the investments and assets of the Permanent University Fund endowment. Although that passage does not specifically mention lands, they are part of the fund’s holdings, the system says.

Moreover, UT officials note, the state Government Code says the regents have “exclusive management and control of the lands.”

“The result of HB 1882, if it passes, is that this would be a direct transfer of money from higher education and these institutions (of the UT and A&M systems) to the companies that have easements that go across university lands,” Carrie Clark, general counsel for the lands, told the House panel.

The cooperative says the Government Code passage is a law that the Legislature is free to amend. It says the passage in the Constitution cited by the UT System applies to investments, such as stocks and bonds, and not to the lands.

The relevant passage in Article 7, the cooperative says, states that any land sales “shall be … on such terms as may be provided by law.” In other words, the cooperative contends, the Legislature can regulate easement transactions because they essentially amount to a temporary sale of a portion of the land.

As things currently stand, the cooperative is essentially being held hostage, Laws said.

“It would cost us over $30 million to relocate the line,” he said. “Most every other easement they have is an investor-owned company. Those folks have a pocketful of money and don’t have time to mess with this kind of stuff. They just pay it and move on.”

HB 1882 remains pending in committee.

“Based on past history, it’s going to be very difficult to pass a piece of legislation that is going to prevent UT from taking in as much money as they possibly can, particularly in this legislative session when the budget is tight,” King said. “But you never know. We might get surprised.”

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Texas News & Politics

Senate moves to bar guns from state psychiatric hospitals
Senate moves to bar guns from state psychiatric hospitals

The Texas Senate amended a bill Wednesday to allow the state psychiatric hospitals to ban guns on their premises, including the Austin State Hospital and nine other facilities. The amendment by Sen. Kirk Watson, D-Austin, was added to House Bill 435, which seeks to allow volunteer emergency workers to carry licensed handguns while on the job. Changes...
Transgender bathroom issue continues to roil Legislature
Transgender bathroom issue continues to roil Legislature

Determining which bathrooms transgender Texans can legally use continues to roil the Legislature as the session enters its crucial final days. Already the subject of two all-night hearings, passionate protests and numerous news conferences, the transgender bathroom issue made a conspicuous appearance at 1:15 a.m. Wednesday, emphatically capping a 13-hour...
House, Senate disagreement on ‘vouchers’ kills school funding bill
House, Senate disagreement on ‘vouchers’ kills school funding bill

The prospect of Texas public schools getting any additional money over the next two years is gone. The Texas House on Wednesday took yet another overwhelming vote against so-called school choice, which would redirect state money to help students pay for private school tuition. Senate Education Chairman Larry Taylor, R-Friendswood, said the move killed...
Texas parks projects on hold after snub by Legislature
Texas parks projects on hold after snub by Legislature

New work to address overdue repairs at Texas state parks and efforts to open new parks to the public appear to be on hold after lawmakers at the Capitol have signaled unwillingness to give more money to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. “We knew this was going to be a very fiscally constrained session going into it,” agency Executive...
Lawsuit: Austin boy, 10, crushed by driveway security gate
Lawsuit: Austin boy, 10, crushed by driveway security gate

A 10-year-old boy was killed when a driveway security gate crushed his body at his friend’s home in Central Austin, according to a lawsuit that assigns blame to various parties, including the gate’s manufacturer and the homeowner. The boy was a guest at a house at 5500 Shoal Creek Blvd on Feb. 18 when he went into a gap between the gate...
More Stories