Viewpoints: Federal housing cuts will further hurt Texas’ working poor


It takes a village made up of folks from the nonprofit world and the private and public sectors to address Austin’s lack of low-income affordable housing. In Austin, as in Texas and the U.S., the affordable housing village relies on a variety of funding sources to get the job done.

The sources – from federal vouchers that help subsidize rent, to corporate tax credits for projects to create new housing units for the poor – often work together to help low-income individuals and families.

Austin and other Texas cities help elderly and disabled residents and working families with limited incomes get into homes they otherwise could not afford. Now, President Trump’s tax reform and federal budget proposals — which include steep corporate tax breaks and cuts to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs – threaten local and state efforts to increase and preserve low-income affordable housing stock.

HOW WE GOT HERE: Federal cuts could worsen Austin’s affordability crisis, groups say.

As Congress prepares to take on Trump’s proposals, we urge our Texas leaders – including Sens. John Cornyn and Ted Cruz – to stand up for families in need and reject proposals that hurt most those with less, as the administration’s plans do.

Currently, nonprofit and for-profit low-income affordable housing developers negotiate with investors — typically corporate entities — for funding in exchange for federal low-income housing tax credits. Developers get funding for their projects, and the corporate entities or investors get tax breaks.

Under Trump’s tax reform proposal, which slashes the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 15 percent, incentives for corporate participation in low-income housing projects could decline, experts say.

There’s a potential one-two punch in that the president’s federal budget plan would slash housing funding by 15 percent – or $7 billion. The cuts, the National Low Income Housing Coalition estimates, could affect millions of senior citizens, veterans and low-income families already struggling to make ends meet.

When the lives of Texans improve, so does the health of our state. We know that where a person lives has an impact on that person’s success in life. Studies show that a stable, safe and integrated living environment leads to better health, education and employment outcomes. Continued and increased federal funding for affordable housing can help stabilize families in Texas and the nation.

The need for housing assistance is dramatic in Central Texas. Consider that financial experts suggest that a person reserve about 30 percent of gross monthly income for rent. However, in Travis County, a third of residents spend about half their income on housing expenses alone, according to Austin Homes, Austin Voices, a local affordable housing advocacy group. About half of all Williamson County residents do the same.

VIEWPOINTS: New city panel could yield insight on zoning, gentrification.

In Austin — where the average rent was $1,224 in 2016 — a person making the federal $7.25 minimum wage, for example, would have to work 82 hours a week to afford a market-rate, one-bedroom apartment, according to data by Capitol Market Research.

Federal housing vouchers and other housing assistance programs help low-income families make ends meet. Cuts to programs that help fund affordable housing initiatives threaten the well-being of some our country’s most vulnerable.

Experts say Trump’s tax reform proposal could hurt the federal Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program, the primary method local entities use to direct private funds toward creating and preserving low-income housing developments. Through the program, investors from the private sector can lower their tax liability in exchange for funding affordable housing projects. But, with significantly lower tax rates, investors might be less willing to participate.

Texas and the rest of the country can’t afford to lose corporate investment in affordable housing.

Since 1986, corporate investments through the federal tax credit program have helped create about 3 million affordable homes across the nation. That figure includes more than 46,000 homes in Texas over the past five years alone. Here in Austin, Foundation Communities has used the tax credit program since 2000 to build 10 apartment communities that serve over 1,400 low-income families each year.

Under the federal budget proposal, Texas could lose $494 million in housing funding, affecting more than 55,000 families statewide. Austin faces losing $18.2 million in HUD funding, which means almost 2,000 households could lose vouchers or other types of housing assistance.

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK: Our Viewpoints page brings the latest commentaries to your feed.

Most recipients of housing assistance are unable to work because they are either over 65 years of age, have a disability or are caring for a person with disabilities. Others who can work do, according to several studies.

Statistics are similar for recipients of housing vouchers, which subsidize rent, and those who live in public housing: Up to three-fourths of nonelderly, nondisabled recipients of housing assistance have jobs, according to data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the Urban Institute. In places like Austin, where wages haven’t kept up with the cost of housing, many hard-working families just don’t make enough money to afford rent, food and necessities.

If Trump’s proposals are adopted, they’ll have an even harder time making ends meet. For a better Texas, state lawmakers in Congress should advocate on their behalf.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: Oct. 19, 2017

Re: Oct. 16 article, “CodeNext: Is Austin doing enough to reach out to non-English speakers?” Why translate? If anyone wants to live in the U.S., let them learn the talk of the country. Last I heard, here it was still English. If I moved to Mexico, do you think that they would print everything in English? Of course not. When my ancestors...
Commentary: Let’s build global consensus for reconnecting with nature
Commentary: Let’s build global consensus for reconnecting with nature

During the past few weeks, millions of people around the Gulf of Mexico have experienced the fury of Mother Nature. Four massive hurricanes and two earthquakes have devastated numerous communities. It is humbling to realize that despite enormous technical advancements, we are still as much at the mercy of nature’s wrath as the Teotihuacanos in...
Commentary: Why Hartnett White is dangerous for environmental council
Commentary: Why Hartnett White is dangerous for environmental council

With each new appointee to the Trump administration, it’s like the president is trolling us. Put someone who sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 14 times in charge of the agency? Check. Appoint a man who wanted to eliminate the Department of Energy as its head? Check. But you ain’t seen nothing yet. Trump’s newest choice...
Opinion: Trump’s scary strategy on North Korea

On just the first day of a war between the United States and North Korea, according to a Stanford University assessment, 1 million people could be killed. Yet after my five-day visit to North Korea with three New York Times colleagues, such a nuclear war seems terrifyingly imaginable. In the North Korean capital, Pyongyang, it was clear that President...
Trump’s appeal to evangelicals is timely and welcomed

President Trump addressed this year’s annual Values Voters Summit in Washington, D.C. He is the first sitting U.S. president to do so. The Values Voters Summit is hosted by the Family Research Council, an organization whose mission is addressing public policy and culture from a Christian point of view. Its base is largely evangelical Christians...
More Stories