Two Views: The truth about education spending in Texas, by Dan Patrick


The 2017 legislative session recently ended and, as if on cue, education bureaucrats began pushing out misinformation, insisting that the state cut funding for public schools. You may have seen it in the media or maybe even heard it directly from your local school officials. Here are the facts:

Texas spends $60 billion on schools in our two-year budget including both federal and state funds — and $41 billion of that is state funding. That is on top of the estimated $28 to $30 billion annually that is paid by local property taxpayers. When colleges and universities are added, education spending is the biggest item in the state budget – about 52 percent of all state dollars. Health care is second, accounting for most of the remaining dollars. It is disingenuous to suggest that we are, somehow, holding back funding that we could spend on our schools.

TWO VIEWS: School finance is dead. Dan Patrick administered the poison.

Senate Bill 1, the state budget, fully funds the state’s Foundation School Program — the state share of school funding. It also provides funding for the estimated 80,000 new students who are projected over the next two years.

The state’s school funding formula is based in part on property values in each school district. In the Senate, we passed a property tax relief program that would have required local entities to get a vote of the people anytime they increased property tax rates beyond five percent. Had this passed, property tax rates would decrease over time. Unfortunately, the property tax reform proposal was killed in the Texas House.

Misinformation is also being put out about the Additional State Aid for Tax Reduction (ASATR) program that was established in 2006 by the legislature to help off-set low property values in some districts. Most districts no longer qualify for these funds. Currently, only 267 of the 1,246 school districts in Texas are ASATR Districts.

ASATR has long been slated to expire this year and the state budget, which was approved by a vote of 135 to 14 in the Texas House and 30 to 1 in the Texas Senate, did not include additional funds for it. School districts have known for six years that ASATR would expire in 2017.

In the Senate, we passed House Bill 21, which would have included $532 million in additional school funding, including $150 million to help bridge the funding gap for ASATR districts for the next two years. There was also additional facilities funding for charter schools and traditional school districts.

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK: Our Viewpoints page brings the latest commentaries to your Facebook feed.

However, House Bill 21 also included $50 million for a small school choice program for children with disabilities. The Texas House killed that proposal too. The House turned down over a $500 million in additional school funding rather than use a tiny percentage of school funding to allow a disabled child somewhere in Texas to attend a private school.

But the big joke in the school finance debate is that the House version of House Bill 21 put an additional $1.85 billion into education. What they didn’t tell you was their $1.85 billion would have come from current funding for the schools they were trying to help. They were, literally, robbing Peter to pay Paul. The Senate rejected that phony plan.

Before I was elected lieutenant governor, I served as chairman of the Senate Education Committee. Public education has been a priority for me since I began serving in public office. School finance is an issue I know well and these are the facts.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Krauthammer: What the parents of Charlie Gard should do for their baby
Krauthammer: What the parents of Charlie Gard should do for their baby

One cannot imagine a more wrenching moral dilemma than the case of little Charlie Gard. He is a beautiful 11-month-old boy with an incurable genetic disease. It depletes his cells’ energy-producing structures — the mitochondria — thereby progressively ravaging his organs. He cannot hear, he cannot see, he can barely open his eyes...
Opinion: Mainstream media and the real crimes of Russiagate

For a year, the big question of Russiagate has boiled down to this: Did Donald Trump’s campaign collude with the Russians in hacking the DNC? And until last week, the answer was “no.” As ex-CIA director Mike Morell said in March, “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians … there is smoke, but...
Owen Egerton’s ‘Hollow’ explores suffering, Austin and the hollow Earth
Owen Egerton’s ‘Hollow’ explores suffering, Austin and the hollow Earth

Owen Egerton would like to see the city of Austin decide to end homelessness. “I absolutely think we could do it,” Egerton said. The novelist, volunteer, screenwriter, director, husband, father, event and podcast host and ongoing hardest working man in Austin entertainment and cultural production is discussing “Hollow,” his...
Letters to the editor: July 21, 2017
Letters to the editor: July 21, 2017

Re: July 18 commentary, “Gov. Abbott: Overregulation makes Texas dream a California nightmare.” Gov. Greg Abbott has his nerve. For a state government that has spent a great deal of capital suing the federal government for Texas to follow its own path, it’s the height of hypocrisy for the state to punish local governments for doing...
Herman: The Texas Senate, while you were sleeping
Herman: The Texas Senate, while you were sleeping

Three things for which I don’t want to be in charge of explaining to the space monkeys when they arrive here from the planet Nipzor: 1. How come sometimes the guy who gets the second most votes gets to be president. 2. How Texas managed to lose to Kansas in football last season 3. Why, on the third day of a 30-day special legislative session...
More Stories