Texas cities should follow San Antonio’s lead on new tobacco law


San Antonio recently took a major step to protect its residents’ health by passing a law that prevents merchants from selling tobacco products to anyone under age 21 within city limits, becoming the first Texas city to do so. Other Texas cities should follow San Antonio’s lead.

First, some facts. Currently, 14 percent of people in Texas smoke and 23 percent used to smoke. According to national data, the average age of smoking initiation is under age 21, regardless of gender, race/ethnicity, or cigarette type. Tobacco is the leading cause of preventable death, contributing to 1,300 deaths in the U.S. every day. In addition, tobacco use is costly — more than $300 billion each year from medical care and lost productivity.

San Antonio’s new law will make it harder for youths to get access to tobacco products. Because most teens who experiment with tobacco become regular smokers, the law is important for curbing the tobacco epidemic and reducing costs. If other cities in Texas, or the state as a whole, passed a similar measure, it would amplify the new law’s impact.

After all, there is not much to prevent San Antonio youths ages 18-20 from purchasing tobacco products from merchants outside the city limits. In short, we need greater geographic coverage.

Prevention of tobacco use among youths is a complex issue and includes pricing, taxation, regulation, advertising, enforcement and access. For example, young people, who are more price-sensitive than their older counterparts, are less likely to buy cigarettes when they are priced higher because of taxation. In addition, tobacco outlets and advertising are limited near schools. And the Food and Drug Administration recently banned many flavored tobacco products that are often appealing to youths.

Despite this multifaceted approach, significant challenges remain to prevent smoking among youths. The powerful tobacco industry with its deep pockets has a well-established history of using coordinated strategies to encourage young people and disadvantaged populations to smoke and use smokeless tobacco. The industry spends more than $24 million every day on advertising and promotion of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. Moreover, there is still much to be learned about the health effects of e-cigarettes and vaping.

Although the law is moving tobacco control in a positive direction from a public health standpoint, limitations exist. In particular, the law does not penalize young adults (ages 18-20) from purchasing, accessing or using tobacco products. Thus, it may seem like the regulation is one-sided. Research has established that tobacco control is best supported when efforts target users as well as suppliers and environmental influences.

In addition, critics of the ordinance indicate that more input is needed from merchants to fully understand the economic impacts, particularly among small merchants. For example, price discounts are often paid to retailers to reduce the price of cigarettes to consumers.

On a societal level, there is a long history of tension between those who see government regulation as critical to public health and those who value individual responsibility and choice above all else. Quarantine laws, fluoridation of water systems, vaccination requirements for schooling, and seat belt, speeding and helmet laws are just a few examples of these regulations.

Though San Antonio’s new law is only one facet of an overall strategy to curb tobacco use among youths, it is a critically important one and moves us one step closer to building research-based policies that support tobacco control.

Additionally, it has the potential to decrease the socioeconomic disparity in tobacco use since individuals with lower education and income use tobacco at higher rates than those with higher education and income. This may be critically important for San Antonio, with its large population of Latinos, many of whom are uninsured and of low socioeconomic status.

It’s time for other Texas cities to follow San Antonio’s lead and score more wins for public health.

Cubbin is a social work professor at the University of Texas. Ford is an assistant professor in the College of Pharmacy at UT.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the editor: Feb. 22, 2018
Letters to the editor: Feb. 22, 2018

We are long overdue for legislation on gun safety. We must require permits to purchase firearms, contingent on 1) completion of firearm training and education, and 2) passing a universal background check through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. We must give private sellers access to this system and require them to use it. And...
Facebook comments: Feb. 20, 2018
Facebook comments: Feb. 20, 2018

As reported by the American-Statesman’s Philip Jankowski, Austin became the first city in Texas to regulate sick leave. The Austin City Council voted early Friday to make paid sick leave a mandatory requirement for all nongovernment employers. It passed 9-2, with Council Members Ora Houston and Ellen Troxclair voting against it. The ordinance...
TWO VIEWS: Let’s use better tools to decide which inmates get bail
TWO VIEWS: Let’s use better tools to decide which inmates get bail

Criminal justice reform is a prominent issue in the public square, capturing the interest of both ends of the ideological spectrum, as well as celebrities, think tanks and even the White House. Propelling this issue forward, both nationally and in the Lone Star State, is a recognition that change is needed. Especially when it comes to jails. One of...
TWO VIEWS: Return to real criminal justice reform, like it’s 1989
TWO VIEWS: Return to real criminal justice reform, like it’s 1989

It will surprise many to learn that once upon a time — and not so very long ago — a bipartisan coalition of Texas legislators approved an innovative plan aimed at reducing crime through progressive health and education strategies. The year was 1989, and the proposals were put together by Lt. Gov. Bill Hobby, a Democrat, with the cooperation...
Letters to the editor: Feb. 19, 2018
Letters to the editor: Feb. 19, 2018

On infrastructure funding, Trump has it right by proposing that states and corporations pay the bulk of maintenance and construction. In our early national history, entrepreneurs cut pikes through forests and built ferries to cross rivers. Users probably complained but paid the tolls nonetheless. It wasn’t until the highway system was established...
More Stories