You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myStatesman.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myStatesman.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myStatesman.com.

Stanford: Campus carry unlikely to have a happy ending


As romantic fantasies go, it’s a pretty good one. You’re strolling across campus and suddenly you hear the “pop-pop-pop” of gunfire. This is what you’ve been training for those four hours it took to get a concealed carry permit. You can hit a target if both you and the target are standing still, not panting too hard, and reasonably close. You whip out your handgun from your backpack and race toward the sound of gunfire.

Except the police get there first. Like most big college campuses — including Virginia Tech — yours has its own police force. Sure, they aren’t going to get mistaken for SEAL Team Six, but they’re on site, and they get to race toward the sound of gunfire in patrol cars. And then there are the SWAT teams in armored personnel carriers and helicopters with guys holding sniper rifles and any cop within shouting distance who will be there in less than five minutes.

All of these people are looking for the same thing you are: a young male with a gun. Come to think of it, the suspect probably fits your description. With all the cops with guns flying to the scene, you’d consider yourself lucky if they gave you a chance to get on the ground instead of just shooting you. Like most romantic notions, this fantasy breaks down after you start asking practical questions.

That’s why veteran John Parker did nothing when he heard gunshots at Umpqua Community College. He had a handgun. He had the training. And he was not under fire. But he stayed put because he knew the police wouldn’t know by looking at him that he was a good guy.

“Luckily we made the choice not to get involved,” he told MSNBC. “We were quite a distance away from the building where this was happening. And we could have opened ourselves up to be potential targets ourselves, and not knowing where SWAT was (and) their response time, they wouldn’t know who we were. And if we had our guns ready to shoot, they could think that we were bad guys.”

But that’s no fun. Keep running toward that bad guy with a gun. Let’s assume you’re a minute ahead of law enforcement and you have a better-than-average fitness level. And let’s say you are no Barney Fife and know your way around your weapon. You know where the safety is, for example.

But let’s also assume that you’re not a veteran and lack combat training. You have four hours of handgun training under your belt, which, in the words of a friend of mine who is a career infantryman who has served in both Afghanistan and Iraq, “is barely enough to keep from accidentally shooting yourself in a quiet, empty room, in my opinion.”

The military trains for these situations because when you run at full speed and then point your gun at a target, you can’t control your breathing, your eyes aren’t getting all the blood they normally would, and your muscles are tired and shaking. “Being able to hit the same spots on the same target in quick succession — that can only be achieved after firing several hundred to thousands of rounds on the same weapon, preferably under physical stress,” he said, requesting anonymity because he works at the Pentagon and isn’t allowed within seven miles of the press.

But let’s assume that you’re a world-class athlete. You’re calm and controlled even after a sprint across campus. Now what?

Chaos.

“If you happen upon a crowded hallway or cafeteria, people are running at you — away from the source of gunfire — screaming, crying, bleeding, pushing past you or climbing over you. Maybe you’re shot yourself, and suddenly you start catching glimpses of somebody just shooting — is your first instinct to shoot? How do you know it’s not a plainclothes officer or another Good Samaritan shooting at a gunman you can’t see?” asked my friend.

Stopping a bad guy with a gun requires more than a good guy with a gun. It requires a lot of well-trained good guys coordinating with each other. This is why UT System Chancellor William McRaven told Texas lawmakers that legalizing campus carry would make us “less safe.” Of course, what does McRaven know? Sure, he is the former head of our nation’s Special Operations Command, but that was a desk job.

Our thoughts and prayers are not enough. Apparently we also need romantic fantasies of heroism.

Stanford is a Democratic consultant, author and nationally syndicated columnist. He blogs at jasonstanford.org and tweets @JasStanford.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Commentary: How UT can lead change for sustainability in Texas
Commentary: How UT can lead change for sustainability in Texas

Last month, 177 faculty and staff from across the University of Texas system wrote Chancellor William McRaven urging him to reduce the climate-damaging methane pollution leaking from oil and gas facilities on land managed by the UT System. The letter was followed by a student government resolution making the same request. While many of us have seen...
Commentary: Remembering JFK in the era of Trump
Commentary: Remembering JFK in the era of Trump

I learned recently that it was my father, the economist John Kenneth Galbraith, who in 1957 introduced the young Massachusetts Sen. John F. Kennedy to the Washington representatives of Algeria’s National Liberation Front, a meeting that led to Kennedy’s July 2, 1957, speech endorsing Algerian independence – and by extension, the cause...
Commentary: How to vote on health care if you’re a Christian lawmaker
Commentary: How to vote on health care if you’re a Christian lawmaker

Many political leaders who support the U.S. House or Senate version of a new health care bill proudly identify themselves as Christian — “pro-life” and “pro-family.” What puzzles me is how these leaders reconcile their personal values and commitments with embracing a plan that limits or excludes poor people as well as...
Opinion: Stroke awareness month shows need for lifesaving health care

May is National Stroke Awareness Month. It was elevated for recognition by former President George H.W. Bush for a significant reason. A stroke occurs in the United States approximately once every forty seconds and remains the leading cause of long-term disability that Americans face. Consequently, almost everyone has a connection to someone who has...
Commentary: How TxDOT continues the wrong approach to Texas 45 SW
Commentary: How TxDOT continues the wrong approach to Texas 45 SW

For over 35 years, Save Barton Creek Association has worked to protect Barton Creek and Austin’s crown jewel, Barton Springs. One of the gravest threats we see to this iconic natural resource is the construction of Texas 45 Southwest. Part of Texas 45 SW is to be built through land critical to the springs’ flow. Over the years, the Texas...
More Stories