You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.


  • ePAPER

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks


Welcome to

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on

Simmons: Texas, it’s time to end straight-ticket voting

Much has been made of the personalities and deficiencies of the candidates at the top of the ticket this November. However, far less attention was paid to the actual issues each candidate believed in — much less the issues that separated candidates toward the bottom of the ballot.

Straight-party-ticket voting allows voters to check one box and have the entire ballot completed for them. As a result, the voter casts a ballot for a party’s entire slate of candidates. This election was a textbook lesson in why “convenience” voting does not always produce the best results up and down the ballot.

For this reason, I believe Texas should join 41 other states in eliminating straight-ticket voting. The Founding Fathers’ concept of the self-governance of our nation relied on entrusting voting rights to an educated (not just informed) electorate. When the campaign becomes about personalities and parties, the need to research and be educated on the platforms, records and issues of each candidate is obscured or overlooked entirely.

For example, I wonder how many straight-party-ticket voters on the Democratic side knew that not only were they casting a ballot for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, but also for my opponent, who has run for office four times under three different party banners, including as a write-in candidate for vice president under the Socialist Party in 2012? I seriously doubt that the vast majority of Democrats in Texas House District 65 are socialist. I am sure examples on the other side of the political aisle could be sighted as well.

The fact of the matter is, too often voters focus on top-of-the-ballot races with little regard for the policies of local candidates, who almost always have a much bigger impact on their day-to-day lives. Removing “one box” voting will also require all candidates to get out their message and their goals if elected. It prevents them from hiding behind a party banner that may or may not reflect their personal views or policies.

Voters would still be free to vote only for the candidates of a single party, but it would require them to make each choice individually, and hopefully lead them to become more educated about the process, the candidates and the issues affecting them.

Isn’t our way of life and system of government important enough to merit reflection on each candidate for elected office? With the onslaught of new voters this cycle and the vitriol at the top of the ticket, I am confident that many votes were cast down ballot with little or no education by the voter.

I introduced HB 1288 in the 84th Legislature to remedy this, but it died in committee. I just filed a similar bill for the upcoming 85th Legislature, and I ask you to call your senators and representatives asking for their support of this important legislation — and, even more importantly, civics lesson — for our fellow Texans.

Rep. Ron Simmons, R-Carrollton, represents House District 65, which includes parts of Carrollton, Lewisville, Highland Village, Dallas and Coppell.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Herman: The Texas Railroad Commission and bathroom attendance
Herman: The Texas Railroad Commission and bathroom attendance

It was a Tuesday that careened between low rhetoric and high drama as the Texas House churned toward the unlikely intersection of energy industry regulation and who should go to which bathroom. The day’s highlight was the bill needed to keep the Texas Railroad Commission in business. Lurking in the background were amendments that would have set...
Freedom Caucus conservatives are today’s abolitionists

The House Freedom Caucusis taking flak, with many saying they are responsible for the failure to pass the American Health Care Act. With all other Republicans on board, the votes of the 29 Freedom Caucus members could have led to passing the legislation. But they refused to support it. Should they be chastised as obstructionists? Are they childish...
Letters to the editor: March 29, 2017
Letters to the editor: March 29, 2017

Re: March 20 commentary, “Wear: Uber and Lyft ride hail into the Legislature — again.” Regarding Uber and Lyft: Ben Wear may want to look up “overconfidence effect” — that is, the tendency for people to think they know more about a subject than they actually do. I don’t think you’ll find many who think...
Commentary: The creative working class are bringing American jobs back
Commentary: The creative working class are bringing American jobs back

Even though tech progress tends to grab more headlines, there’s another “Made in America” story to be told. There’s a harkening back to the days of craftsmanship — and there is a groundswell of interest and entrepreneurship surrounding skills and trades. Legions of people seek work that calls for the use of their hands...
Commentary: We can honor today’s women through common-sense policies
Commentary: We can honor today’s women through common-sense policies

My mother was smart, compassionate and unfailingly giving. Though I don’t believe I will ever be able to equal her in spirit, I am forever grateful for the lessons she gave me and my sisters, which I am now passing on to my daughter. She taught us the vital role we all play in improving the lives of the people we love and the communities we live...
More Stories