You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.


  • ePAPER

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks


Welcome to

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on

breaking news

US to expand pool of people targeted for deportation

Northwest Austin needs effective, consensus building representation

In the initial debate over whether Austin’s City Council should move to single-member districts, there was a lot of talk about representation.

The old, at-large council over-represented Central Austin interests, leaving the city’s suburban neighborhoods on the sidelines. The complaints included charges that the political leanings of Austin’s central neighborhoods meant that conservatives didn’t have a chance. All true.

The 10-1 system changed that with geographic representation and the election of three fiscally conservative members. However, it remains an open question whether District 6 in Northwest Austin is better off than it was two years ago when it elected Don Zimmerman in a runoff election against businessman Jimmy Flannigan by 191 votes. Now District 6 voters will have a do-over on Nov. 8, which will be as much about leadership style as it is about policy differences.


As the incumbent, Zimmerman has made headlines (and earned Editorial Board members’ ire) for his inflammatory rhetoric, penchant for suing the city (aka taxpayers), displays of contempt for city staff and his refusal to compromise with his colleagues on the council.

In fact, libertarian-leaning Zimmerman is unapologetic about his two years in office, saying that he has an “obligation” to sue the city as part of his oath of office and that he has taken his election as a vote of consensus in the district on his conservative values. He did eke out a half-victory in his lawsuit about the city’s campaign fundraising rules: The court agreed that incumbents should have a wider window of time to raise political contributions but upheld the city’s $350 cap on donations.

To our minds, a 2-point margin in a runoff election hardly constitutes a mandate, and representative democracy means “standing in” for all of one’s constituents, not just the ones you agree with. Voters in Northwest Austin care about budgets, but they also care about transportation, human services and public safety.

READ: Supporters: Despite ‘rough edges,’ Zimmerman voices taxpayers’ angst

Style in politics can be as important as substance, and Zimmerman’s antagonistic style has gotten in the way of accomplishing what he claims to value — tighter fiscal control by the council and a fully funded home owner property tax exemption.

This is not to say that Zimmerman hasn’t scored some conservative victories through his use of the bully pulpit, including helping to kill a referendum on the new Travis County civil courthouse. And for some of his supporters, the fact that he raises unpopular issues is enough, even if measurable results are limited. The question for voters is whether Zimmerman’s passion for limited government is enough to counter his intolerant rhetoric.

Flannigan, who is a Democrat in this nonpartisan race in a district that leans Republican, will have his own challenges with bridging the gap between a liberal-leaning council and his more conservative constituents. He likes to say that his district is “moderate,” but in fiscal terms the area not only votes Republican but has soundly rejected most bond proposals that have been thrown its way. The more moderate voting segments of the district were less likely to turn out in the 2014 general election and runoff and less likely to make it all the way to the end of the ballot. (More than 25 percent of the voters who cast ballots in District 6 did not vote in the City Council race.)

READ: Flannigan offers Northwest Austin progressives a softer anti-Zimmerman

Then again, Flannigan has proven his ability to make progress on other issues through the Northwest Austin Coalition, which he founded. He has remained engaged in transportation and other issues since losing the 2014 election. In fact, Flannigan and Zimmerman have sparred in forums about which man is responsible for the inclusion of Anderson Mill Road on the mobility referendum, which is also on the ballot in November.

Flannigan’s coalition has been working on the corridor since summer 2015, including getting an engineer to donate his time for the study and working with the city to accept the work. Zimmerman’s first mention of the corridor on the City Council bulletin board was June 20, 2016, a few weeks after city staff presented the project to the mobility committee and after the corridor appeared in the mayor’s draft bond proposal.

In addition to his work with NWAC, Flannigan is former president of the Austin Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce and a member of the Austin Chamber of Commerce’s Transportation Committee. One of his best public moments was his impassioned speech immediately after horrific shooting spree at a gay nightclub in Orlando.

Flannigan’s message is consistently one of inclusivity and consensus building, just as it was in the 2014 race.

Although the board is not endorsing candidates in this race, we have consistently been in favor of consensus building as a way to create public policy that works for all corners of the city. The representative for District 6 should be the person best equipped to not only voice the district’s concerns but make sure solutions that benefit the district and the city become reality.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Jack Hunter: Be aware of unelected officials who steer government
Jack Hunter: Be aware of unelected officials who steer government

Long before Donald Trump became president and his top national security adviser Michael Flynn was accused of treason, there was concern about a “deep state” in the U.S. “The phrase ‘deep state’ is popping up ever more in public discussions,” wrote libertarian Jeffrey Tucker in 2014: “What does it mean? It refers...
Herman: Wrestling with gender identity
Herman: Wrestling with gender identity

As we navigate the brave and befuddling new world of gender identity, Mack Beggs was inevitable. And so was Madeline Rocha. Both are accomplished high school athletes to be celebrated for the time and sweat it takes to become such, especially in their grueling sport of choice. Beggs, 17, of Euless Trinity High School, heads to Cypress this week to...
Commentary: Picking fights with Mexico will be at our own peril
Commentary: Picking fights with Mexico will be at our own peril

The relationship between the United States and Mexico is at a historic low. Months of threats and Mexico-bashing by President Donald Trump have left our neighbors to the south with a mixture of anger, resentment and anxiety. The rhetoric has created a breach that threatens to become a profound chasm. We need to remember that while Mexico needs the...
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 21, 2017
Letters to the Editor: Feb. 21, 2017

Re: Jan. 27 article, “Why Trump’s border wall won’t be easy to build in Texas.” Dear Gov. Abbott, I am concerned about the future of some of our iconic landmarks in West Texas. Namely I’m worried about Big Bend National Park, Balmorhea State Park and the McDonald Observatory. These places must remain preserved, pristine...
Mona Charen: Patriotism, not nationalism
Mona Charen: Patriotism, not nationalism

National Review has sparked an important debate about nationalism. As someone who has been accused throughout her life of excessive love of country (can’t count the number of times I’ve been reproached for arguing that despite slavery, Jim Crow and the internment of Japanese-Americans, our country is eminently lovable), I feel a bit awkward...
More Stories