You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myStatesman.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myStatesman.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myStatesman.com.

Martin: Justice suffers while Cruz delays judicial nominations


The understanding that justice should be swift and everyone deserves their day in court is a fundamental American value.

But when that day in court takes over three years to complete, justice is no longer swift, and the delays can become a serious problem. After all, justice delayed is justice denied.

In Texas, those delays have become far more common since Sen. Ted Cruz took office. And with nine vacancies in Texas’ federal courts — and no nominees recommended from Sens. Cruz or Cornyn to fill any of those empty judge chairs — the delays are only going to get worse.

It creates a real challenge for Cruz. How will his dreadful history with judicial nominations impact his run for president?

Our courts matter. The most critical issues of the day — racial discrimination, equal pay, immigration, abortion, voting rights, same-sex marriage and death benefits, etc. — often end up in court. And while some don’t make the headlines and few ever reach the Supreme Court, each one of those cases matters a lot to someone.

Here are the facts: Texas has more empty seats in our federal courts than any state in the country. Added together, the nine federal bench seats have been vacant for more than 14 years.

Without enough judges to hear cases, the delays have stacked up. And it’s only gotten worse under Cruz.

Since Cruz took office in January 2013, the number of civil cases in Texas’ federal courts lasting three years or longer has more than doubled. During that same time, the number of overall cases left pending has gone up by 3,395 — an approximate 10 percent increase in inefficiency.

The reason is simple: There aren’t enough judges to do all the work.

As U.S. District Judge Ron Clark, the chief judge for Texas’ Eastern District Court, recently told Texas Lawyer: “For the last several years, we’ve had a couple of judgeships vacant. Our caseload went way, way up.”

Cruz has another inglorious fact to face: Since he took office, there’s been no women recommended to our federal courts. On the other hand, 12 of the 16 female judges currently seated in Texas’ federal courts were appointed while Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison was in office — and the remaining four were there before she was senator in 1993.

Despite nine current vacancies in Texas’ federal courts, Cruz has put forward no nominees — female or male — in 2015. Now that he’s spending more and more time on the campaign trail, it’s fair to question whether or not he ever intends to fix the problem.

As Cruz travels the country asking people to give him the power to nominate judges, those of us who are his constituents here at home should ask him why he’s done nothing to fix the judicial crisis in his own backyard.

After all, it’s only fair that Cruz does the job he already has before he asks us for a new one.

Martin is deputy director of Progress Texas.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Commentary: How colleges lost control by promoting activism over study
Commentary: How colleges lost control by promoting activism over study

This year will go down as the year of the Great Academic Meltdown. Campus after campus — from Yale to Middlebury — violence has shut down the free exchange of ideas and the very possibility of rational discussion and debate. How is this possible — and what can be done about it? In just 50 years, how did we go from institutions of...
Jack Hunter: Trump Derangement Syndrome vs. Obama Derangement Syndrome
Jack Hunter: Trump Derangement Syndrome vs. Obama Derangement Syndrome

Media Matters’ Eric Boehlert wrote in 2016, “It’s classic Obama Derangement Syndrome: the inability of adults to rationally deal with the actions of the Democratic president.” He was describing conservatives’ sometimes irrational hatred of all things Obama. And he had a good point: From 2008 through 2016, conservatives...
Letters to the editor: June 27, 2017
Letters to the editor: June 27, 2017

Re: June 20 article, “High court to weigh partisan gerrymandering.” I’m pleased that the Supreme Court has agreed to consider the legality of political gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the biggest thing that contributes to the hyperpartisanship that we are currently experiencing. It encourages conflict rather than compromise &mdash...
Kathleen Parker: President Jujitsu and the art of the bluff
Kathleen Parker: President Jujitsu and the art of the bluff

WASHINGTON — Five months into Donald Trump’s administration, only the unwise doubt the president’s intelligence. Just ask former FBI Director James Comey, who, in addition to being fired by Trump, has been redefined by the president as a dishonest leaker who might have lied were it not for nonexistent tapes of their conversations...
Maureen Dowd: Donald skunks the Democrats
Maureen Dowd: Donald skunks the Democrats

WASHINGTON — You know who is really sick and tired of Donald Trump winning, to the point where they beg, “Please, Mr. President, sir, it’s too much”? Democrats. The Democrats just got skunked four to nothing in races they excitedly thought they could win because everyone they hang with hates Trump. If Trump is the Antichrist...
More Stories