Letters to the editor: Sept. 7, 2017

Re: Aug. 31 commentary, “Herman: President Donald Trump’s ill-chosen words.”

Hard to believe that when Texas is experiencing its worst natural disaster in our history, Ken Herman decides to write an article nit-picking our president’s comments during his visit to our state. What’s wrong with thanking Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn for showing up, then thanking his staff and cabinet for doing a fantastic job?

Shame on you Ken!


Re: Aug. 30 article, “In Austin for Harvey briefing, Trump gets earful on immigration.”

This 86-year old Tejano, whose parents were born in Mexico, will continually pray that one day very soon, our president and lawmakers working on immigration reform legislation deliver positive results.

My main concern revolves around the young people — “dreamers” — who hopefully, after obtaining “registered provisional immigration” status, can apply for legal, permanent residency in five years, perhaps less time, then immediately request citizenship in our beautiful America. The Department of Homeland Security is empowered to streamline that process and citizenship plans.


I am happy that Donald Trump came to Texas to check out the results of Harvey’s visit.

I find it interesting that during his news conference in Austin he was surrounded by a vast array of elected officials. It was a nice photo-op where all these men could show their concern regarding Harvey. But where was our mayor?

Oh, he was preparing Austin to take in refugees from the storm. What a slacker!


Re: Aug. 31 commentary, “Herman: President Donald Trump’s ill-chosen words.”

If God in all his glory came to earth, I would imagine Ken Herman would have some criticism of him. Everyone uses their own words — and no two people are going to react alike. Leave my president alone. He is doing a great job. Get over the fact that Hillary Clinton did not win. I guess you have to write your column and that was the best you could do. I will not be reading anything you write — you can count on that. You lost. Get over it!


President Trump paid his respects to Texas and expressed how well everything was going. A quick visit, to say the least, at a table full of important people — both in Corpus Christi, and Austin.

But it seemed odd that his four-hour visit to Texas did not include a flyover to view the catastrophic damage in Rockport and Houston. I remember past presidents getting real close to the destruction caused by these momentous storms. Not just a video shot.


In the past 30 years of records, no storm west of Florida has intensified in the last 12 hours before landfall. Until now.

Climate change is not a future problem. It’s a current threat.


Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: GOP tax reform used to be unpopular. Not anymore.

WASHINGTON — When the Republican-controlled Congress first approved its tax bill in December, most Democrats believed it would be a political loser for the GOP. Indeed, a New York Times poll found that just 37 percent of Americans approved of the plan. “To pass a bill of tax cuts and have it be so unpopular with the American people is an...
Opinion: Everybody’s better than you-know-who

Perhaps you read this week that Donald Trump has replaced James Buchanan as the worst president in the history of the United States. This was in a survey of experts in presidential politics — people who have an opinion about whether Chester A. Arthur was better than Martin Van Buren. Trump came in last, with a score of 12 out of 100. Perhaps...
Commentary: How the Texas tax pyramid stalls business growth
Commentary: How the Texas tax pyramid stalls business growth

Last month, President Trump traveled to the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland to deliver a message: America is once again open for business. That’s great news for Austin and the rest of the nation. Thanks to tax reform, foreign companies are giddy about expanding their operations in the United States. Ulrich Spiesshofer, CEO of...
Herman: Should doctors play with guns?
Herman: Should doctors play with guns?

It remains a Rorschach test for our times. As I’ve noted after previous incarnations of this ongoing discussion, different people see different things when they see a gun. Some see only a potential murder weapon. Some see good, clean recreational fun. Few have no reaction when they see or talk about guns. So perhaps it was foreseeable that the...
Commentary: Hamilton and Madison never imagined assault weapons
Commentary: Hamilton and Madison never imagined assault weapons

As a frequent lecturer for legal education courses, I found myself in New Orleans last week when the mass shooting in Parkland, Fla., occurred, breaking our collective hearts once again. As we grapple for lawful ways to restrict access to these devastating weapons of death, we are all beholden to the theories, myths and mysteries of what our framers...
More Stories