Letters to the editor: Sept. 22, 2017

Re: Sept. 16 article, “Round Rock boy selling soap to help Hurricane Harvey survivors.”

What an inspirational young man Ezekiel is!

In the midst of hurricane tragedy, I hope that survivors will hear the story about Ezekiel’s compassion for them and how it led him to selfless action on their behalf. They aren’t just getting soap; they’re also getting love. Now, where can I get a bar of that “monkey fart” soap?


Re: Sept. 14 commentary, “11 reasons Austin will lose the affordable housing battle.”

In his editorial on affordable housing, Dick Brown states: “Neighborhood associations may undermine CodeNext, whose main purpose is to increase central city density.”

You’re darn right we oppose CodeNext. Density has never lowered housing prices. In fact, in every instance, housing prices increased with density. Don’t take my word for it. Spend two minutes online and see for yourself. Simply Google “effects of density on affordability.”

The only people to benefit from increased density and reduced parking restrictions would be real estate developers. They’re not bad people — but they’re driven by profit, not a desire to maintain family-friendly neighborhoods. If you love Austin, email Mayor Steve Adler and tell him you don’t want Austin to be ruined by unchecked development. Remember: We don’t get to vote on CodeNext — and once our neighborhoods are ruined, there’s no going back.


Re: Sept. 14 commentary, “Before Austin offers tax incentives, let’s see if they work.”

Kudos to Bill Aleshire for his column regarding local tax incentives to big companies. His article should be framed and hung in City Chambers.

He asks: “How have tax incentives and the resulting growth benefited common folks who lived here already?” Can our city leaders answer that question?

Then, he notes that the cost of living for current residents is driven up when corporations are given tax breaks. It is so true that inflated real estate values and the associated tax increases are creating hardships for us. We are not benefiting from the vaunted “livability” index, but instead bravely endure the ever-increasing traffic, persistent homelessness, mediocre public schools, increasing property crimes and then, of course, fear of the annual property tax bill.

I join Aleshire in rejecting the pro-growth-at-any-cost position of many of our leaders.


Re: Sept. 17 commentary, “Sanders’ drug plan puts Texas patients, companies in peril.”

Russell Withers’ editorial is biased, full of half-truths and outright lies. Most importantly it turns a blind eye to how much of big pharma’s research is funded by the American taxpayers — and yet they overcharge the same public for the medications that the taxpayers have paid for already.

Withers condemns Bernie Sanders’ complaints, but totally ignores Sander’s truth of how big pharma’s research is funded. “Under this insane system, Americans pay twice. First we pay to create these lifesaving drugs, then we pay high prices to buy those drugs,” wrote Sanders in a New York Times op-ed. “Our government must stop being pushovers for the pharmaceutical industry and its 1,400 lobbyists.”


Re: Sept. 14 letter to the editor, “DACA foes’ rule of law claims are laughable.”

What’s laughable is the author’s knowledge of what constitutes a law. She mistakenly believes that an executive order is a law, which is not true. It is just a proclamation by a “dictator in chief,” which the next president can change on his or her first day in office, which President Obama did for almost all of President Bush’s executive orders.

Only Congress can enact a law that’s designed to stop the possibility of a runaway president, like Obama, from making laws that are not for all the people.


The first question to ask any politician regarding climate change is: “Sir. Define aeolian processes.” The answer you will most likely get is: “Say, what?”

Aeolian processes were hard at work in the midsection of the U.S. during the Dust Bowl of the 1930s when, after the farmers raped the land by not using any soil conservation techniques, the land raped the farmers. Sounds like a perfect example of man-made “climate change.”


Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Commentary: Boeing ruling stretched to keep government records secret
Commentary: Boeing ruling stretched to keep government records secret

Every week, government officials across Texas and private companies receiving taxpayer dollars get increasingly creative in hiding public records. Their new tool is the Boeing ruling, a decision from the Texas Supreme Court that lowered the threshold for arguing competitive bidding as an exemption from disclosure under the Texas Public Information...
Commentary: As Austin’s many faiths gather, a common humanity emerges
Commentary: As Austin’s many faiths gather, a common humanity emerges

Every year, I work with diverse faith leaders to plan Interfaith Action of Central Texas’ (iACT) annual Interfaith Thanksgiving Service. It involves weeks of meetings with new groups. Each year is completely unique. It is one of the greatest experiences of growth I have each year — and it always brings out new talents and skills in myself...
This Thanksgiving, here are 5 myths about American Indians
This Thanksgiving, here are 5 myths about American Indians

Thanksgiving recalls for many people a meal between European colonists and indigenous Americans that we have invested with all the symbolism we can muster. But the new arrivals who sat down to share venison with some of America's original inhabitants relied on a raft of misconceptions that began as early as the 1500s, when Europeans produced fanciful...
Letters to the editor: Nov. 23, 2017

There is a well-worn real estate mantra: “location, location, location.” But poor design can ruin a great location. The city of Austin and the University of Texas have overlooked the need for a level of architectural control for years. UT is completing such a master stroke at Guadalupe Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard with the...
Opinion: Billionaires desperately need our help

It is so hard to be a billionaire these days! A new yacht can cost $300 million. And you wouldn’t believe what a pastry chef earns — and if you hire just one, to work weekdays, how can you possibly survive on weekends? The investment income on, say, a $4 billion fortune is a mere $1 million a day, which makes it tough to scrounge by with...
More Stories