Letters to the editor: Oct. 30, 2017

Former President Carter’s recent statement regarding the media’s treatment of President Trump is right on. Trump is being treated the same way Vietnam veterans were treated when we came back from the war — and by the same kind of people. We were despised, cursed at, lied about — even spit on.

Trump gave up a pleasant billionaire’s lifestyle to help us recover from the mess created by the last four presidents. His reward for being patriotic is to be cursed at and savaged in the media. Being popular doesn’t make you competent, as evidenced by said former presidents. He was handed a world crawling with terrorists, a nut case threatening us with nuclear war, and our best jobs in China.


Sens. Jeff Flake’s and Bob Corker’s denunciation of Trump comes with asterisks, since they have decided not to seek office again. But they are saying what is reported that Republican Congressman are saying privately: Trump is an embarrassment to our country and a danger to the world.

How many times have we watched these same legislators walked down a line to shake hands with men in uniform and thank them for their service and for risking their lives for their country? Yet, these same legislators refuse to follow the lead of Flake and Corker because it would be a risk to their political lives. Profiles in courage? Hardly. Profiles in cowardice? Absolutely.


I was brought up to be thoughtful and intellectually curious — and to be caring, considerate and respectful of others.

When I was young and naïve, I believed that everyone held to these principles. But, as I went out into the world, I soon realized that there were people who instead chose to be mean, bigoted, selfish and willfully ignorant.

I always wondered, “How many people were like this? What percentage of the population had decided to be so cruel and thoughtless? Was it 10 percent? 50 percent?”

It turns out, the answer is 38 percent.


Here we go again. The U.S. Senate voted on Oct. 19 to advance a budget bill that includes revenue from drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Over the past 30 years, Congress has voted nearly 50 times on whether to drill in the Arctic Refuge. Yet, time and time again, Congresses of the past followed the science and public opinion to ensure that our nation’s largest and wildest refuge remains protected today.

Not this Congress.

In addition to its beauty and natural significance, recent polling commissioned by the Center for American Progress tells us that more than two-thirds of the American public want to see this iconic landscape protected.

I am disappointed that Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn voted to advance a budget that sells off our Arctic Refuge to Big Oil. Now, it is time for them both to stand up for our public lands and wild places.


Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Facebook comments: Jan. 23, 2018
Facebook comments: Jan. 23, 2018

As reported by the American-Statesman’s Kevin Lyttle, Precourt Sports Ventures, owners of Columbus Crew SC, has ruled out the Travis County Exposition Center as a possible Major League Soccer stadium site. PSV officials said they toured the site and researched it before determining that it did not fit their needs for an urban-core facility with...
TWO VIEWS: Democracy? Bag it, say the Republicans
TWO VIEWS: Democracy? Bag it, say the Republicans

The urgent love Texas Republicans feel for plastic bags is a mystery. Let’s look, though. Maybe there’s a clue in the trail left by former Texas congressman Tom Loeffler all the way back in the 1980s. The game is afoot — literally. As a candidate for governor back in 1986, Loeffler confessed that he had worn plastic shower caps on...
Letters to the editor: Jan. 22, 2018

Re: Jan. 18 article, “Expo Center trimmed from PSV’s list of Austin MLS stadium sites.” The possibility of Butler Shores being decimated for a soccer stadium worries me. I am absolutely against such a move. These negotiations appear to be similar to the bullying of Austin that Uber and Lyft attempted. Butler Shores, at the confluence...
TWO VIEWS: Why Supreme Court should rule against bag ban
TWO VIEWS: Why Supreme Court should rule against bag ban

Shoppers might soon discover that the grocery store is less expensive and more convenient. Two weeks ago, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case questioning the legitimacy of municipal bans on plastic bags. If justices reaffirm an appellate court ruling, consumers will be unburdened from this clear example of government overreach. At...
Opinion: What is the real message of #MeToo?

The feminist website Babe published an account of a date gone bad. The pushback has been swift and sharp. I share some of the concerns of the critics, but I also think young women are sending a message that is being missed. The account by the anonymous “Grace” about a bad date with comedian Aziz Ansari was, if not “3,000 words of...
More Stories