You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.


  • ePAPER

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks


Welcome to

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on

Letters to the editor: March 17, 2017

Re: Feb. 26 commentary, “Healing won’t begin until LASA represents all of Austin ISD.”

The Statesman has published yet another misguided screed about the racial makeup of the Liberal Arts and Science Academy. LASA is a nationally recognized school with a race-blind admissions policy. If blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented at LASA, it is because too many Austin Independent School District students fail to obtain the primary school education needed to prepare for an academically advanced magnet high school.

As the parent of three LASA graduates, I know the work required to succeed there. Austin ISD’s focus should be on preparing students in elementary and middle schools, and not relaxing LASA’s educational standards. Smaller classes and the active support of parents and the larger community are needed to improve outcomes at the elementary level, resulting in more diversity at the end of the pipeline. Focus on the root of the problem, not the natural consequences of failing to do so.


Re: Feb. 26 commentary, “Healing won’t begin until LASA represents all of Austin ISD.”

Thanks for Yasmiyn Irizarry’s powerful editorial about the Liberal Arts and Science Academy. She used specific data to shed truth on how LASA is “reminiscent of apartheid.”

From the start, the Austin Independent School District separated magnet teachers and students from those in the neighborhood. No wonder LBJ’s population never integrated with LASA students. Now one area has two principals, two graduations and two senior proms. Can we say “separate but equal” here?

If the district bows to the LASA parents, it will continue to push the LBJ students further away. We should connect and integrate, not disconnect and separate.

During the Oscars, Mark Rylance said, “Sometimes, the most supportive thing is to oppose,” but we also should try as he said, “opposing without hatred.” When we mix with others who are different, we have a chance to learn from opposition. I hope that Austin ISD figures out how to reach out to the LBJ community instead of running away.


Re: Feb. 25 article, “Cornyn unveils bill to protect domestic violence housing.”

The article explains that the SafePlace program received about $625,000 in Housing and Urban Development grants last year. It notes a recent HUD rule change that endangers that funding. Sen. John Cornyn’s bill will require HUD to prioritize funding grants for domestic violence survivors over those for all other homeless groups, including veterans, families and others living in the street.

Though I agree domestic violence shelters should receive funding, the senator’s bill will not provide more money. It merely flips the deck and prioritizes domestic violence shelters over all other homeless people and programs. The result will be that a veteran with PTSD will go unserved — or a family whose breadwinner has been laid off will remain on the street. Homeless programs need more money, not more legislation.


Re: March 1 article, “Democrats in speech rebuttal say Trump will ‘rip’ away care.”

The Democratic Party response to President Trump’s congressional address was very telling. First, they selected an out-of-office Democrat who would not need to worry about losing his next election due to his pre-scripted negative harangue that all things Trump are evil. Second … well, there is no second as he never once responded to Trump’s address in this so- called Democratic Party response.

This Kentucky ex-governor lost his last election to his Republican candidate while his state voted by a large margin for Trump. It is clear he and his party still do not know why or do not care why.


Re: March 1 article, “Sessions hints Trump may crack down on pot.”

Regarding Attorney General Pete Sessions’ remarks about potentially cracking down on recreational marijuana use, one question: What problem do you have with weed that you don’t have with alcohol, tobacco and firearms?

Alcohol is sold “at every corner grocery store,” and factors in the loss of many thousands of lives annually. Tobacco is a poison that degrades health and kills people by the tens of thousands annually. Firearms cause tens of thousands of deaths annually. Marijuana? Uh, not a whole lot there. In fact, it’s proving to be medically useful. Who knows what good it might do if shackles were taken off researching it?

So how about some consistency in what threats to public health you pursue? When we see a meaningful limit on gun ownership, then maybe you’ll have license to question smoking weed “recreationally.” Oh, and while we’re talking consistency, about that “this should be left to the states” thing — hypocrite much?


I’m really tired of Trump supporters telling me to “get over it.” I won’t. I don’t need to wait any longer to see how he does. Every action he’s taken goes against all I believe. Ken Herman can say whatever he wants in his column because we still have a free press in spite of Trump. And I can say whatever I believe because of free speech.

We don’t need to make America great “again.” It’s always been great and will continue to be great as long as these two institutions are in place. What are you afraid of? That we might hit on some truth you can’t deny? Are you feeling buyer’s remorse yet? Do you miss Obama now that he’s gone? I do. I’m not going to be quiet. In the words of Sen. John Lewis, I’m going to “get in the way!”


Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Herman: GOP, in charge now, faces perilous future
Herman: GOP, in charge now, faces perilous future

Not long ago I had the eye-opening opportunity to hear a presentation here in Austin from Robert P. Jones, the CEO of the Washington-based Public Religion Research Institute and author of a 2016 book about something about which we’re all familiar. Yes, it’s hard to offer something eye opening about something about which we’re all...
Commentary: The Republicans who took on Richard Nixon
Commentary: The Republicans who took on Richard Nixon

“Well, he better start fighting for me or he’s gonna be out! I want him to do right, but he must not cut the president!” That was Richard Nixon, caught on tape shouting about his attorney general, Elliot Richardson, who had just insisted on his independence during the Watergate investigation. Nixon’s ire was prescient &mdash...
Letters to the Editor: May 24, 2017
Letters to the Editor: May 24, 2017

Re: May 5 commentary, “Why Cinco de Mayo has new meaning in today’s America.” Good commentary from Morán González on Mexican-Americans’ resolve to fight against racial discrimination in Texas. He mentioned the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), and said that the group’s U.S. citizenship requirement...
David Brooks: The alienated mind
David Brooks: The alienated mind

The campaign of 2016 was an education in the deep problems facing the country. Angry voters made a few things abundantly clear: that modern democratic capitalism is not working for them; that basic institutions like the family and communities are falling apart; that we have a college educated elite that has found ingenious ways to make everybody else...
John Young: ‘Deep Throats’ lined up for a city block
John Young: ‘Deep Throats’ lined up for a city block

Newly elevated, helium-inflated, a president for a bare blink of an eye, Donald Trump chose as one of his first presidential acts a declaration of war on the press. So, how’s that going? Trump called reporters “the enemies of the people.” Henchman Steve Bannon called the media “the opposition party.” Interesting claim...
More Stories