Letters to the editor: March 17, 2017


Re: Feb. 26 commentary, “Healing won’t begin until LASA represents all of Austin ISD.”

The Statesman has published yet another misguided screed about the racial makeup of the Liberal Arts and Science Academy. LASA is a nationally recognized school with a race-blind admissions policy. If blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented at LASA, it is because too many Austin Independent School District students fail to obtain the primary school education needed to prepare for an academically advanced magnet high school.

As the parent of three LASA graduates, I know the work required to succeed there. Austin ISD’s focus should be on preparing students in elementary and middle schools, and not relaxing LASA’s educational standards. Smaller classes and the active support of parents and the larger community are needed to improve outcomes at the elementary level, resulting in more diversity at the end of the pipeline. Focus on the root of the problem, not the natural consequences of failing to do so.

LINDA MELTZER, AUSTIN

Re: Feb. 26 commentary, “Healing won’t begin until LASA represents all of Austin ISD.”

Thanks for Yasmiyn Irizarry’s powerful editorial about the Liberal Arts and Science Academy. She used specific data to shed truth on how LASA is “reminiscent of apartheid.”

From the start, the Austin Independent School District separated magnet teachers and students from those in the neighborhood. No wonder LBJ’s population never integrated with LASA students. Now one area has two principals, two graduations and two senior proms. Can we say “separate but equal” here?

If the district bows to the LASA parents, it will continue to push the LBJ students further away. We should connect and integrate, not disconnect and separate.

During the Oscars, Mark Rylance said, “Sometimes, the most supportive thing is to oppose,” but we also should try as he said, “opposing without hatred.” When we mix with others who are different, we have a chance to learn from opposition. I hope that Austin ISD figures out how to reach out to the LBJ community instead of running away.

GINGER GANNAWAY, AUSTIN

Re: Feb. 25 article, “Cornyn unveils bill to protect domestic violence housing.”

The article explains that the SafePlace program received about $625,000 in Housing and Urban Development grants last year. It notes a recent HUD rule change that endangers that funding. Sen. John Cornyn’s bill will require HUD to prioritize funding grants for domestic violence survivors over those for all other homeless groups, including veterans, families and others living in the street.

Though I agree domestic violence shelters should receive funding, the senator’s bill will not provide more money. It merely flips the deck and prioritizes domestic violence shelters over all other homeless people and programs. The result will be that a veteran with PTSD will go unserved — or a family whose breadwinner has been laid off will remain on the street. Homeless programs need more money, not more legislation.

MEL HAZLEWOOD, MEADOWLAKES

Re: March 1 article, “Democrats in speech rebuttal say Trump will ‘rip’ away care.”

The Democratic Party response to President Trump’s congressional address was very telling. First, they selected an out-of-office Democrat who would not need to worry about losing his next election due to his pre-scripted negative harangue that all things Trump are evil. Second … well, there is no second as he never once responded to Trump’s address in this so- called Democratic Party response.

This Kentucky ex-governor lost his last election to his Republican candidate while his state voted by a large margin for Trump. It is clear he and his party still do not know why or do not care why.

LARRY VOLKENING, HOUSTON

Re: March 1 article, “Sessions hints Trump may crack down on pot.”

Regarding Attorney General Pete Sessions’ remarks about potentially cracking down on recreational marijuana use, one question: What problem do you have with weed that you don’t have with alcohol, tobacco and firearms?

Alcohol is sold “at every corner grocery store,” and factors in the loss of many thousands of lives annually. Tobacco is a poison that degrades health and kills people by the tens of thousands annually. Firearms cause tens of thousands of deaths annually. Marijuana? Uh, not a whole lot there. In fact, it’s proving to be medically useful. Who knows what good it might do if shackles were taken off researching it?

So how about some consistency in what threats to public health you pursue? When we see a meaningful limit on gun ownership, then maybe you’ll have license to question smoking weed “recreationally.” Oh, and while we’re talking consistency, about that “this should be left to the states” thing — hypocrite much?

DAVID VENHUIZEN, AUSTIN

I’m really tired of Trump supporters telling me to “get over it.” I won’t. I don’t need to wait any longer to see how he does. Every action he’s taken goes against all I believe. Ken Herman can say whatever he wants in his column because we still have a free press in spite of Trump. And I can say whatever I believe because of free speech.

We don’t need to make America great “again.” It’s always been great and will continue to be great as long as these two institutions are in place. What are you afraid of? That we might hit on some truth you can’t deny? Are you feeling buyer’s remorse yet? Do you miss Obama now that he’s gone? I do. I’m not going to be quiet. In the words of Sen. John Lewis, I’m going to “get in the way!”

MARILYN LOVE, AUSTIN



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Herman: New rules would restrict grave decorations at city cemeteries
Herman: New rules would restrict grave decorations at city cemeteries

The Austin Parks and Recreation Department on Thursday released long-awaited proposed new rules for the five city-owned cemeteries. Four years is long, right? Even in the cemetery biz. And Tonja Walls-Davis, the city cemetery manager, expects the proposed rules, including tight restrictions on grave decorations, will draw the same kind of objections...
Herman: Caution, free speech might offend you
Herman: Caution, free speech might offend you

It seems that some of our elected officials du jour (see Trump, Donald J., and Abbott, Gregory W.) sometimes have a problem with the whole free speech thing. So it’s comforting that one of our local appointed officials doesn’t. U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks, himself sometimes accused of courtroom free speechifying in ways that challenge...
Letters to the editor: Oct. 20, 2017

Re: Oct. 17 commentary, “Let’s view science as a powerful tool, not as a threat.” Professors Michael Starbird and Jay Banner encourage universities to engage the public in the appreciation of science. It is dangerous, they rightfully state, to develop energy or public health policies not based on the best scientific information, and...
Commentary: Why I changed my mind on bringing guns at Texas colleges
Commentary: Why I changed my mind on bringing guns at Texas colleges

The recent implementation of Texas’ campus carry law allows people with a concealed handgun license to carry their handguns on college campuses. I once supported this law, but now that I am spending every day on a college campus in Texas, I can no longer say the same thing. My change of heart regarding campus carry was accelerated by the gruesome...
Commentary: Why Trump’s pick for refugee office deserves more scrutiny
Commentary: Why Trump’s pick for refugee office deserves more scrutiny

The federal government’s relentless effort to prevent an unaccompanied minor from getting an abortion, even after a Texas state district judge has waived her need for a guardian’s consent, is shameful. Thankfully, on Wednesday, a federal district judge in Washington, D.C., ruled that federal agencies detaining the 17-year-old unauthorized...
More Stories