You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myStatesman.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myStatesman.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myStatesman.com.

Kusler: Don’t defund sanctuaries that welcome those yearning to be free


Fear is among our strongest motivators and is, at its core, a survival instinct millions of years in the making.

And while fear can indeed provide an awareness essential to survival, it can also be reactionary and crippling.

Consequently, fear-mongering is common in political communication. Just take stock in the rhetoric coming out of the numerous debates and campaign advertisements related to the upcoming presidential election.

One of the most disturbing uses of fear is playing out as candidates and elected officials prey on the reactionary fears that many Americans have about immigrants — particularly immigrants in the country illegally.

The potency of these messages lies within arguably our greatest human fear: the fear of the unknown, which unfortunately often turns into hate.

Donald Trump, for example, has called immigrants murderers and rapists, promised to build a wall around the United States, and called on the country to block the entry of all foreign Muslims. These reactionary rants fan the flames of the fear dominant in how many of us think and act.

Trump is not alone in using tough talk on immigrants to purportedly provide the security followers seek. Seemingly every Republican candidate has a hardline immigration policy that plays on fear.

This tactic is not limited to the presidential campaign trail either. In a recent trip to the Southwest, I took note of the many state-level campaign ads using the same ill-informed, fear-mongering, tough talk on immigrants.

Not to be outdone, fear-peddlers in Washington too have introduced legislation in Congress aimed at eliminating funding for, of all things, law enforcement of state and local governments that have been deemed “sanctuaries” for immigrants.

The congressional effort in fact preys on two fears at once: the fear of immigrants and the fears immigrants themselves have — deportation, the splitting up of families, the decimation of livelihoods and more.

Immigrants are humans, too. For many, whether here through official or unofficial channels, their journey to the United States was born out of a desire for survival and a search for security and hope.

Every waking moment, sleepless nights included, immigrants living illegally in the United States are balancing their thoughts between achieving their dreams and avoiding their worst fears.

So-called sanctuary cities or states are not havens of lawlessness, as opponents would have you believe. These jurisdictions simply do not put the time-consuming business of profiling and immigration status checks at the top of their law enforcement priorities, leaving more time for fighting and preventing more critical criminal matters.

Immigrants living in these jurisdictions illegally are thus provided a tiny bit of breathing room and a chance to put more emphasis on their hopes rather than their fears.

For this humane and frankly prudent criminal justice practice, the merchants of fear in Congress want to strip cities or states of money intended to bolster homeland security activities.

We are not even talking about that much money. The funds in question represent less than half of 1 percent of the overall budgets in the largest jurisdictions. Instead, the whole exercise is nothing more than a legislative version of a Trump rant.

Congress should reject this alarmist approach to governance and focus more on creating opportunity and hope for everyone living in the United States, citizenship status aside.

Kusler is the executive director of Americans for Democratic Action, a liberal advocacy organization.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Letters to the Editor: February 25, 2017
Letters to the Editor: February 25, 2017

Re: Feb. 11 article, “One of greatest gifts to give your children, a happy marriage.” Once again I was delighted to see the Statesman celebrate a wonderful couple, Moses and Anna Saldaña. I never met Moses, but as an impoverished law student at the University of Texas back in the 1970s, Anna Saldaña was my angel of mercy....
Commentary: Lessons for America from my own refugee tale
Commentary: Lessons for America from my own refugee tale

In 1970, Cambodia began its civil war with the Khmer Rouge, whose goal was to overthrow the Khmer government and create a communist country, the Democratic Kampuchea. What was once a beautiful and peaceful Cambodia would soon become a war-torn nation, with rockets launching constantly into the city and leveling buildings into rubble. I was 15 and in...
Gail Collins: Trump is bad for water and puppies

And now, things that are Really Happening in the world of Donald Trump. We bring you this list as a public service. It’s easy to be distracted by all the strange/contradictory/awful things the president says. Maybe he keeps talking crazy to divert attention from the fact that he doesn’t have anything else to report. In Washington, outside...
Commentary: Does tax reform crater core services? City waste says ‘no’
Commentary: Does tax reform crater core services? City waste says ‘no’

Will Rogers once famously teased: “I don’t make jokes. I just watch government and report the facts.” It’s a shame that Will isn’t around to chronicle today’s city government shenanigans. It’d be like shooting fish in a barrel. In the Capital City, where the motto is “Keep Austin Weird,” city officials...
Charles Krauthammer: Trump and the ‘Madman Theory’
Charles Krauthammer: Trump and the ‘Madman Theory’

At the heart of Donald Trump’s foreign policy team lies a glaring contradiction. On the one hand, it is composed of men of experience, judgment and traditionalism. Practically every member of the team — the heads of State, Homeland Security, the CIA, and most especially Defense Secretary James Mattis and national security adviser H.R. McMaster...
More Stories